6 pending office actions • 4 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 5 (83%) |
| §102 only | 1 (17%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FEREJA, SAMUEL D | 1 | 74.9% | +11.6% |
| MAHMUD, FARHAN | 1 | 55.4% | +10.5% |
| FUJITA, KATRINA R | 1 | 70.2% | +24.0% |
| ANYIKIRE, CHIKAODILI E | 1 | 74.9% | +11.5% |
| WALLACE, JOHN R | 1 | 77.3% | +24.9% |
| WERNER, DAVID N | 1 | 67.7% | +16.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18201941 | VIDEO CODING METHOD AND APPARATUS USING INTRA PREDICTION USING DIRECTION AND POSITION DEPENDENT PREDICTION COMBINATION OR MATRIX BASED PREDICTION | WERNER, DAVID N | 104d overdue |
| 18863252 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VIDEO CODING USING GEOMETRIC MOTION PREDICTION | FEREJA, SAMUEL D | 49d overdue |
| 18375651 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VIDEO CODING USING ADAPTIVE INTRA PREDICTION PRECISION | ANYIKIRE, CHIKAODILI E | 9d overdue |
| 18665041 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR LIDAR POINT CLOUD CODING USING POINTWISE PREDICITON | FUJITA, KATRINA R | 12d |
| 18374510 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DYNAMIC MESH CODING | WALLACE, JOHN R | 13d |
| 18820873 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VIDEO CODING USING CONTEXT MODEL INITIALIZATION | MAHMUD, FARHAN | 40d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2487 | 3 |
| 2483 | 1 |
| 2672 | 1 |
| 2682 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18863252 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VIDEO CODING USING GEOMETRIC MOTION PREDICTION | FEREJA, SAMUEL D | 2487 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 49d overdue | Pending | Nov 05, 2024 |
| 18820873 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VIDEO CODING USING CONTEXT MODEL INITIALIZATION | MAHMUD, FARHAN | 2483 | §102 | Final Rejection | 40d | Pending | Aug 30, 2024 |
| 18665041 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR LIDAR POINT CLOUD CODING USING POINTWISE PREDICITON | FUJITA, KATRINA R | 2672 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 12d | Pending | May 15, 2024 |
| 18375651 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VIDEO CODING USING ADAPTIVE INTRA PREDICTION PRECISION | ANYIKIRE, CHIKAODILI E | 2487 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 9d overdue | Pending | Oct 02, 2023 |
| 18374510 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DYNAMIC MESH CODING | WALLACE, JOHN R | 2682 | §103 | Final Rejection | 13d | Pending | Sep 28, 2023 |
| 18201941 | VIDEO CODING METHOD AND APPARATUS USING INTRA PREDICTION USING DIRECTION AND POSITION DEPENDENT PREDICTION COMBINATION OR MATRIX BASED PREDICTION | WERNER, DAVID N | 2487 | §103 | Final Rejection | 104d overdue | Pending | May 25, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial