Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/866,889

DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING OXYGEN STORAGE AMOUNT IN THREE-WAY CATALYST

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 18, 2024
Priority
May 19, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022020843
Examiner
EDWARDS, LOREN C
Art Unit
3746
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
559 granted / 686 resolved
+11.5% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
723
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
43.5%
+3.5% vs TC avg
§102
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§112
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 686 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nakagawa et al. (U.S. 2016/0215717). PNG media_image1.png 870 652 media_image1.png Greyscale Re claim 1: Nakagawa discloses a method (see Figs. 1, and 10-14 (Fig. 11 shows first normal operation control (first normal operation control is also referenced as “basic normal operation control” per Para 150) and second normal operation control per Para 154; also see Para 36 and Para 38)) for controlling a quantity of oxygen (OSAsc, oxygen storage amount - Para 95) stored in a three-way catalytic converter (20, three-way catalyst - Para 55) of an internal combustion engine (1, engine body - Para 45), wherein the three-way catalytic converter (20) is arranged in an exhaust passage (19, exhaust manifold - Para 48; 22, exhaust pipe - Para 48 (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element s 19 and 22 are collectively a type of exhaust passage as shown in Fig. 1 and as described in Para 48)) of the internal combustion engine (1), the method comprising: feedback-controlling an air fuel ratio of the internal combustion engine (1) in accordance with an air fuel ratio setpoint in vicinity of a stoichiometric point (Paras 91-96 - “…The control system of an internal combustion engine is provided with an inflowing air-fuel ratio control means for adjusting the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst. The inflowing air-fuel ratio control means of the present embodiment adjusts the amount of fuel supplied to a combustion chamber to thereby adjust the air fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst… The internal combustion engine of the present embodiment uses the output current Irup of the upstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 40 as the basis for feedback control so that the output current Irup of the upstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 40 (that is, the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst) becomes a value corresponding to the target air-fuel ratio… The weak rich set air-fuel ratio is slightly richer than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, for example, is made 13.5 to 14.58, preferably 14 to 14.57, more preferably 14.3 to 14.55 or so… In this way, in the present embodiment, the target air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the upstream side exhaust purification catalyst 20 is alternately set to the lean set air-fuel ratio and the weak rich set air-fuel ratio.”); controlling the air fuel ratio setpoint so as to conform the quantity of stored oxygen (OSAsc) to a target value (Modified Fig. 11 above - A (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element A as a line depicting individual target values of quantity of stored oxygen at varying point in time))(Paras 91-96 (especially see Para 95)); and setting the target value (Modified Fig. 11 above - A) of the quantity of stored oxygen (OSAsc) in accordance with a flow rate of gas (see Fig. 11 at “INTAKE AIR AMOUNT” and Para 152 - “…if the intake air amount increases, the flow rate of the exhaust gas flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst increases…”) entering the three-way catalytic converter (20) such that the target value (Modified Fig. 11 above - A) decreases as the flow rate of gas increases (see Modified Fig. 11 above at element A between t11 and t14 and Paras 151-157 (especially Paras 153 and 156-157)). Re claim 2: Nakagawa discloses the method (see Figs. 1, and 10-14) as claimed in claim 1 (as described above), wherein the setting of the target value (Modified Fig. 11 above - A) of the quantity of stored oxygen (OSAsc) is implemented by setting the target value such that the target value (Modified Fig. 11 above - A) relatively rapidly decreases with respect to increase in the flow rate of gas in a region where the flow rate of gas is relatively small (see Modified Fig. 11 above at element A between t5-t11), and the target value relatively slowly decreases with respect to increase in the flow rate of gas in a region where the flow rate of gas is relatively large (see Modified Fig. 11 above at element A between t11-t12). Re claim 3: Nakagawa discloses the method (see Figs. 1, and 10-14) as claimed in claim 1 (as described above), comprising substituting a flow rate of intake air of the internal combustion engine for the flow rate of gas (see Fig. 11 at “INTAKE AIR AMOUNT” and Para 152 - “…if the intake air amount increases, the flow rate of the exhaust gas flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst increases…”). Re claim 4: Nakagawa discloses a device (Fig. 1) for controlling a quantity of oxygen (OSAsc, oxygen storage amount - Para 95) stored in a three-way catalytic converter (20, three-way catalyst - Para 55) of an internal combustion engine (1, engine body - Para 45)(see Figs. 1, 10-14 (Fig. 11 shows first normal operation control (first normal operation control is also referenced as “basic normal operation control” per Para 150) and second normal operation control per Para 154; also see Para 36 and Para 38) and Paras 92-96 and 151-160), the device (Fig. 1) comprising: the three-way catalytic converter (20) being arranged in an exhaust passage (19, exhaust manifold - Para 48; 22, exhaust pipe - Para 48 (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element s 19 and 22 are collectively a type of exhaust passage as shown in Fig. 1 and as described in Para 48)) of the internal combustion engine (1)(see Fig. 1); an air fuel ratio sensor (40, upstream side air-fuel ratio sensor - Para 185) disposed on an inlet side of the three-way catalytic converter (20)(see Fig. 1); and a controller (31, electronic control unit - Para 183) configured to control a fuel injection quantity (Paras 91-96); wherein the controller (31) is further configured to: feedback-control an air fuel ratio of the internal combustion engine (1) in accordance with an air fuel ratio setpoint in vicinity of a stoichiometric point (Paras 91-96 - “…The control system of an internal combustion engine is provided with an inflowing air-fuel ratio control means for adjusting the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst. The inflowing air-fuel ratio control means of the present embodiment adjusts the amount of fuel supplied to a combustion chamber to thereby adjust the air fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst… The internal combustion engine of the present embodiment uses the output current Irup of the upstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 40 as the basis for feedback control so that the output current Irup of the upstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 40 (that is, the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst) becomes a value corresponding to the target air-fuel ratio… The weak rich set air-fuel ratio is slightly richer than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, for example, is made 13.5 to 14.58, preferably 14 to 14.57, more preferably 14.3 to 14.55 or so… In this way, in the present embodiment, the target air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the upstream side exhaust purification catalyst 20 is alternately set to the lean set air-fuel ratio and the weak rich set air-fuel ratio.”); control the air fuel ratio setpoint so as to conform the quantity of stored oxygen (OSAsc) to a target value (Modified Fig. 11 above - A (person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize element A as a line depicting individual target values of quantity of stored oxygen at varying point in time))(Paras 91-96 (especially see Para 95)); and set the target value (Modified Fig. 11 above - A) of the quantity of stored oxygen (OSAsc) in accordance with a flow rate of gas (see Fig. 11 at “INTAKE AIR AMOUNT” and Para 152 - “…if the intake air amount increases, the flow rate of the exhaust gas flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst increases…”) entering the three-way catalytic converter (20) such that the target value (Modified Fig. 11 above - A) decreases as the flow rate of gas increases (see Modified Fig. 11 above at element A between t11 and t14 and Paras 151-157 (especially Paras 153 and 156-157)). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kobyashi et al. (U.S. 6,718,754) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Loren C Edwards whose telephone number is (571)272-7133. The examiner can normally be reached M-R 6AM-430PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Laurenzi can be reached at (571) 270-7878. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LOREN C EDWARDS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3746 7/10/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747729
ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR WITH INTEGRATED VAPOR INJECTION CIRCUIT
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744444
MAGNETIC FIELD DEVICE AND METHOD OF DRIVING MOLTEN METAL
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735999
TWO-PHASE THERMAL PUMP
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12716395
ENGINE SYSTEM
1y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12709205
SEAT ACTUATOR CONTROL FOR LUMBAR SUPPORT
2y 12m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.2%)
2y 5m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 686 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month