Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/866,963

BIOSENSOR AND METHOD FOR PREPARING BIOSENSOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 18, 2024
Priority
May 18, 2022 — CN 202210547593.8 +1 more
Examiner
KAUR, GURPREET
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Leadway (Hk) Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
507 granted / 780 resolved
+5.0% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+36.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
805
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
79.4%
+39.4% vs TC avg
§102
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§112
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 780 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bhullar et al. (US 2004/0194302). Claim 1. The term “auxiliary region” is very broad term and for examination purpose, examiner is construing auxiliary region to be a region enclosed by engraved line or by an engraved line together with an edge line of substrate (see specification page 12, Fig 2 description). Bhullar et al. teach a biosensor (biosensor 210; Figs 1 and 2 and [0090]), comprising: an insulating substrate (base 212; [0092]), a sample injection port (inlet opening 221; [0090], a sample injection channel for entrance of a test sample (slit 248; [0096]-[0099], and a conductive layer disposed on the insulating substrate (conductive material 216 [0090], engraved lines and electrodes divided by the engraved lines being distributed on the conductive layer (laser-ablated gaps defining electrode system 266,268 [0101]), a reagent layer being disposed on part or all of the electrodes located in the region of the sample injection channel (reagent 264 [0090], wherein an auxiliary region enclosed by an engraved line or by an engraved line and an edge line of the biosensor is disposed on the conductive layer under the other end of the sample injection channel opposite to the sample injection port, the transverse width of the auxiliary region is greater than or equal to the width of the sample injection channel, and the projection of the lower edge of the sample injection channel on the conductive layer falls within the auxiliary region or on the border of the auxiliary region (conductive layer 216 is laser ablated to form engraved lines i.e. electrodes 266 and 268 and contact pads; see Fig 2 and the region enclosed by the engraved lines and base edge reads on auxiliary region that is located under the slit region opposite to sample injection port, the transverse width of conductive region spans the base 212 and thus the transverse width of the auxiliary region is width of conductive region which is greater than the width of the slit and lower edge of the slit falls within the auxiliary region; see Fig 2). Claim 2. Bhullar et al. teach the auxiliary region is located at the most distal end of the sample injection channel (see Fig 2). Claim 3. Bhullar et al. teach the auxiliary region is further away from the sample injection port than the electrodes (see Fig 2). Claim 4. Bhullar et al. teach the electrodes comprise a working electrode and a counter electrode [0101][0103], and the auxiliary region is further away from the sample injection port than the working electrode and the counter electrode (see Figs 2 and 3) Claim 5. Bhullar et al. teach a part of the auxiliary region is located in the sample injection channel (see Fig 2 and rejection of claim 1 above). Claim 6. Bhullar et al. teach the lower edge of the reagent layer in the sample injection channel is located within the auxiliary region (reagent 264 lower edge located within auxiliary region; see Fig 2). Claims 7 and 10. The term “auxiliary region” is very broad term and for examination purpose, examiner is construing auxiliary region to be a region enclosed by engraved line or by an engraved line together with an edge line of substrate (see specification page 12, Fig 2 description). Bhullar et al. teach a method for preparing a biosensor [0089], comprising the following steps: on an original material having an insulating substrate and a conductive layer, etching the conductive layer to for engraved lines and electrodes divided by the engraved lines (base 212; [0092], conductive material 216 [0090], laser-ablated gaps defining electrode system 266,268 [0101]); adding a prepared reagent to corresponding electrodes (reagent 264 disposed on electrodes; [0090] and Fig 2); and sticking an interlayer and an upper cover in sequence on the electrodes (spacer 214 and cover 218 is disposed on the electrodes; [0097]), wherein an auxiliary region enclosed by an engraved line or by an engraved line and an edge line of the biosensor is disposed on the conductive layer under the other end of the sample injection channel opposite to the sample injection port, the transverse width of the auxiliary region is greater than or equal to the width of the sample injection channel, and the projection of the lower edge of the sample injection channel on the conductive layer falls within the auxiliary region or on the border of the auxiliary region (conductive layer 216 is laser ablated to form engraved lines i.e. electrodes 266 and 268 and contact pads; see Fig 2 and the region enclosed by the engraved lines and base edge reads on auxiliary region that is located under the slit region opposite to sample injection port, the transverse width of conductive region spans the base 212 and thus the transverse width of the auxiliary region is width of conductive region which is greater than the width of the slit and lower edge of the slit falls within the auxiliary region; see Fig 2). Claim 8. Bhullar et al. teach the auxiliary region is located at the most distal end of the sample injection channel (see Fig 2). Claim 9. Bhullar et al. teach the auxiliary region is further away from the sample injection port than the electrodes (see Fig 2). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GURPREET KAUR whose telephone number is (571)270-7895. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curtis Mayes can be reached at 571-272-1234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GURPREET KAUR/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12662577
TEMPERATURE-INSENSITIVE MEMBRANE MATERIALS AND ANALYTE SENSORS CONTAINING THE SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653430
INTERFERENCE REJECTION MEMBRANES COMPRISING CROSSLINKED POLY(VINYL ALCOHOL) MATRICES FOR IMPLANTABLE GLUCOSE SENSORS
4y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650400
BIOSENSOR
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12644861
MODULAR MULTI-CHANNEL POTENTIOSTAT
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12644856
REFERENCE ELECTRODES OF ELECTROCHEMICAL SENSORS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+36.4%)
3y 5m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 780 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month