Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/869,694

Multiple PLL System with Pairwise Phase Difference Regulation

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 26, 2024
Priority
Jun 02, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTEP2022065085
Examiner
O NEILL, PATRICK
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
481 granted / 577 resolved
+15.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
585
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
28.7%
-11.3% vs TC avg
§102
35.9%
-4.1% vs TC avg
§112
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 577 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
CTNF 18/869,694 CTNF 83209 DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 07-30-02 AIA The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 07-34-01 Claim 46 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. a) regarding claim 46: Claim 46 depends on canceled claim 3 and is therefore indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 07-07-aia AIA 07-07 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – 07-08-aia AIA (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 07-15 AIA Claim s 30-32, 43, 45 and 47-49 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102( a)(1 ) as being anticipated by Lye et al. (US Patent No. 9,225,507) . a) regarding claims 30 and 47-49: Lye et al. discloses User Equipment (UE) or a base station, operative in a wireless communication network (column 1, lines 6-27), the UE or base station including one or more transceiver circuits (Figure 3) including a pairwise phase difference regulation system (Figure 8) and method comprising: first and second Phase Locked Loops (PLL) (851 and 852) each comprising a controlled oscillator (403) configured to generate an output periodic signal that is phase-locked to a reference periodic signal (301), in response to a reference tracking feedback loop (313); a first phase difference detector (803) configured to receive a first periodic signal from the first PLL (851) and a second periodic signal from the second PLL (852), and output one or more error signals (804) representing a deviation from a targeted phase difference between the first and second periodic signals, and identifying which of the first and second periodic signals leads in phase (column 10, lines 53-57); wherein each of the first and second PLLs (851 and 852) is configured to control its oscillator (403) in response to both the one or more error signals representing a phase difference between the first and second periodic signals and its reference tracking feedback loop (column 10, lines 58-column 11, line 2); whereby the first phase difference detector (803) and first and second PLLs (851 and 852) form a pairwise phase difference feedback loop operative to minimize a deviation from a targeted phase difference between the output periodic signals of the first and second PLLs (column 10, lines 47-57 and 62-65). b) regarding claim 31: Lye et al. discloses the pairwise phase difference regulation system of claim 30, wherein the first and second periodic signals are the output periodic signals of the first and second PLLs (851 and 852). c) regarding claim 32: Lye et al. discloses the pairwise phase difference regulation system of claim 30, wherein the first and second periodic signals are divided (via 711) output periodic signals of the first and second PLLs. d) regarding claim 43: Lye et al. discloses the pairwise phase difference regulation system of claim 30, wherein the targeted phase error between the output periodic signals of two PLLs in a pairwise difference feedback loop is zero (column 10, lines 53-57). e) regarding claim 45: Lye et al. discloses the pairwise phase difference regulation system of claim 32, wherein each PLL includes a fractional-N frequency divider (604) in its reference tracking feedback loop (313), and an integer frequency divider (711) to generate the periodic signal in the pairwise phase difference feedback loop . Allowable Subject Matter 12-151-08 AIA 07-43 12-51-08 Claim s 33-42 and 44 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 13-03-01 AIA The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record fails to disclose or make obvious a pairwise phase difference regulation system, wherein the first and second periodic signals are obtained by dividing the output periodic signal of the respective PLL by different numbers, the numbers having an integer ratio no larger than 10, or a rational ratio with the numerator and denominator being integers no larger than 10, along with all the other limitations as required by claim 33. The prior art of record fails to disclose or make obvious a pairwise phase difference regulation system wherein, for each of the first and second PLLs, the pairwise difference feedback loop has a higher bandwidth than the reference tracking feedback loop, along with all the other limitations as required by claim 34. The prior art of record fails to disclose or make obvious a pairwise phase difference regulation system, further characterized by a gain circuit interposed in a path of the one or more error signals output by the first phase difference detector, along with all the other limitations as required by claim 36. The prior art of record fails to disclose or make obvious a pairwise phase difference regulation system, wherein the one or more error signals comprise one error signal, wherein a magnitude of the error signal indicates the phase difference of the first and second periodic signals, and a polarity of the error signal indicates which of the first and second periodic signals leads in phase, along with all the other limitations as required by claim 37. The prior art of record fails to disclose or make obvious a pairwise phase difference regulation system, wherein the one or more error signals comprise first and second error signals, each having the same magnitude indicative of the detected deviation but different polarities, and each routed to a different one of the first and second PLLs; and the error signal polarity indicates whether the respective first or second periodic signal leads in phase, along with all the other limitations as required by claim 40. The prior art of record fails to disclose or make obvious a pairwise phase difference regulation system, further comprising: a third PLL comprising a controlled oscillator configured to generate an output periodic signal that is phase-locked to the reference periodic signal, in response to a reference tracking feedback loop; a second phase difference detector configured to receive the second periodic signal and a third periodic signal from the third PLL, and output one or more error signals representing a deviation from a targeted phase difference between the second and third periodic signals, and identifying which of the second and third periodic signals leads in phase; wherein the second PLL is further configured to control its oscillator also in response to the one or more error signals representing a phase difference between the second and third periodic signals; and wherein the third PLL is configured to control its oscillator in response to both the one or more error signals representing a phase difference between the second and third periodic signals and its reference tracking feedback loop; whereby the second phase difference detector and second and third PLLs form a pairwise difference feedback loop operative to minimize a deviation from a targeted phase error between the output periodic signals of the second and third PLLs, along with all the other limitations as required by claim 42. The prior art of record fails to disclose or make obvious a pairwise phase difference regulation system, wherein weights are applied to the phase difference error signals in response to the number of pairwise difference feedback loops in which a PLL participates, along with all the other limitations as required by claim 44 . Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Patrick O'Neill whose telephone number is (571)270-1677. The examiner can normally be reached Monday- Friday 9AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Taelor Kim can be reached at (571)270-7166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK O NEILL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836 Application/Control Number: 18/869,694 Page 2 Art Unit: 2836 Application/Control Number: 18/869,694 Page 3 Art Unit: 2836 Application/Control Number: 18/869,694 Page 4 Art Unit: 2836 Application/Control Number: 18/869,694 Page 5 Art Unit: 2836 Application/Control Number: 18/869,694 Page 6 Art Unit: 2836 Application/Control Number: 18/869,694 Page 7 Art Unit: 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706612
SEMICONDUCTOR INTEGRATED CIRCUIT AND RECEIVER DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12681524
ADAPTIVE CLOCK GATING FOR IMPROVING WEAR OUT-INDUCED DUTY CYCLE SHIFT IN COMPUTER CLOCK NETWORK
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683611
Semiconductor Device Including a Level Shifter and Method of Mitigating a Delay Between Input and Output Signals
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12665581
Semiconductor devices and multi-bit flip-flop circuits having an asymmetrical row structure
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665599
ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.5%)
2y 0m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 577 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month