Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/874,512

HEAVY DUTY TRANSMISSION ARCHITECTURE DESIGN

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 12, 2024
Priority
Jun 13, 2022 — IN 202211033623 +1 more
Examiner
TO, TOAN C
Art Unit
3614
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Emerson Electric Co.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
918 granted / 1002 resolved
+39.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-3.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1012
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
§102
48.7%
+8.7% vs TC avg
§112
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1002 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 11-12 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by JP-2019210977A as cited by applicant. JP-2019210977 discloses a transmission assembly comprising: an input shaft assembly including an input shaft (11) extending between a first end and a second end; an output shaft assembly (12) including an output shaft; a power train gear assembly (see fig. 1) including at least one mechanism (51-53) for changing a gear ratio between the input shaft assembly (11) and the output shaft assembly (12), wherein the power train gear assembly includes a head set gear (36) connected directly to the input shaft (11) proximate the first end; and a bearing assembly (15, 24) including a first bearing assembly (15) supporting the head set gear (36) and a second bearing assembly (24) supporting the input shaft (11) proximate the second end, wherein the second bearing assembly (24) and the second end of the input shaft (11) are located within an internal cavity of the output shaft (12), wherein the head set gear (36) has a first connection interface and a second connection interface with the input shaft (11); wherein the first bearing assembly (15) is press fit onto the head set gear (36). Claims 21-23 and 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Peterson (U.S. 2021/0162860as cited by applicant. Peterson discloses a transmission assembly comprising: an input shaft assembly (23, 24) including an input shaft (23) extending between a first end and a second end; an output shaft assembly (30) including an output shaft; c) a power train gear assembly (33-38) including at least one mechanism for changing a gear ratio between the input shaft assembly (23) and the output shaft assembly (30), wherein the power train gear assembly (33-38) includes a head set gear (36) connected directly to the input shaft (23) proximate the first end; and a thrust mechanism (600) for neutralizing opposing axial loads generated between the input shaft (23) and a main shaft (24), wherein the thrust mechanism (600) is supported by one the input shaft (23), wherein the thrust mechanism (600) is located axially between a first bearing assembly (78) and a second bearing assembly (98) supporting the input shaft (23), wherein the thrust mechanism (600) includes a bearing (602) located about the input shaft (23). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP-2019210977 in view of Peterson (U.S. 2021/0162860) as cited by applicant. JP-2019210977 discloses every element of the invention as discussed above except that the transmission assembly comprising: a power take-off (PTO) unit. Peterson teaches the transmission assembly comprising: a power take-off (PTO) unit (260). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to modify the transmission of JP-2019210977 by using teaching of Peterson in order to operate the vehicle when it is in mobile operation for any gear ratio. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13, 15-19 and 24-26 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 31-34 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding claim 13, the closest prior art as to JP-2019210977 discloses every element of the invention as discussed above except that the first connection interface is a splined connection and the second connection interface is a press fit interface. Regarding claims 15-19, the closest prior art as to JP-2019210977 discloses every element of the invention as discussed above except that a thrust mechanism for neutralizing opposing axial loads generated between the input shaft and a main shaft. Regarding claim 24, the closest prior art as to Peterson discloses every element of the invention as discussed above except that the thrust mechanism is at least partially disposed in a cavity formed between the head set gear and the input shaft. Regarding claim 26, the closest prior art as to Peterson discloses every element of the invention as discussed above except that the thrust mechanism includes a plurality of cylindrical rollers disposed between a pair of thrust washers. Regarding claims 31-34, the closest prior art as to JP-2019210977 and Peterson fails to disclose, teach or suggest a transmission assembly comprising: an input shaft, an output shaft; and a geartrain assembly including: a head set gear fixed to the input shaft, the head set gear being intermeshed with a first countershaft gear and defining a first internal drive interface; a drive gear intermeshed with a second countershaft gear and defining a second internal drive interface; iii) a main shaft intermeshed with the output shaft, the main shaft defining a first external drive interface; and a clutch assembly including a sleeve member slidably disposed about the main shaft, the sleeve member defining a third internal drive interface engaged with the main shaft first external drive interface, the sleeve member defining a first external gear spline, wherein the first external gear spline has a first diameter and the second external gear spline has a second diameter different from the first diameter. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TOAN C TO whose telephone number is (571)272-6677. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5, Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JASON D SHANSKE can be reached at (571)270-5985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TOAN C TO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3614 July 20, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703454
ADJUSTABLE AXLE RETAINING STRUCTURE
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703217
MOTOR VEHICLE WITH ACTIVE SUSPENSIONS AND CONTROL METHOD OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE
1y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698045
COMPACT UTILITY VEHICLE
1y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12686439
UPPER SUPPORT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING UPPER SUPPORT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686442
UTILITY VEHICLE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (-3.6%)
1y 11m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1002 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month