Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/875,944

VIRTUAL SPACE PROVISION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 17, 2024
Priority
Aug 04, 2022 — JP 2022-124694 +1 more
Examiner
SHANKAR, VIJAY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
1020 granted / 1121 resolved
+31.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1133
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
§103
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
§102
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1121 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. 1)Claim 1, last line; the recitation “the association” is indefinite. The recitation “the association” should be recited as “the association with either the first camera or the second camera”. 2)Claim 2, lines 4-5; the recitation “associates each of the terminals with either the first camera or the second camera based on a result of the comparison.” is indefinite. The recitation should be recited as “associates each of the terminals with either the first camera or the second camera based on a result of the comparison of the detected terminals.”. 3)Claim 6, lines 4-5; the recitation “associates the one second camera with the plurality of terminals included in the detected group” is indefinite. It is not clear what is meant by the one second camera. 4)Claim 7, lines 3-4; the recitation “detects the plurality of terminals corresponding to the communications as the one group.” is indefinite. The recitation should be recited as “detects the plurality of terminals corresponding to the communications as the one group associates with the second camera.” Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-7 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion 7. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Matsuura (US Pub 20160114243 A1 in IDS) teaches an image processing system that comprises a common camera control means that determines the position of a common virtual camera on the basis of the positions of the player objects belonging to the corresponding group such that the player objects belonging to the corresponding group are included in the imaging range and an individual camera control means that arranges individual virtual cameras for each player object that does not belong to the group and determines the position of each individual virtual camera on the basis of the position of the corresponding player object such that the corresponding player object is included in the imaging range. Comprising these means enables the image processing system to reduce the processing load of image generation in 3D virtual space. (Paragraph 0007-0009). Watanabe et al (US 20130124683 A1) teaches a data distribution system in which, because requests are likely to be predominately from RANs with a large number of connected clients that can be distribution destination candidates, distribution to such RANs is performed in multicast mode, whereas because it is not expected that requests will be concentrated from RANs with a small number of connected clients that can be distribution destination candidates, distribution to such RANs is performed in unicast mode, and these modes are thus adaptively switched between as the number of connected clients increases or decreases. (Paragraph 0139). Aizawa et al (US 20200322584 A1) teaches a control device that, when the designation of a viewpoint for a virtual camera does not satisfy a virtual camera constraint of maintaining a certain standard image quality, carries out control so that the virtual camera does not move from a position that satisfies the constraint or returns the virtual camera to a position that satisfies the constraint and thereby reduces the amount of transmission data in accordance with the load on the network. (Paragraph 0113-0116). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VIJAY SHANKAR whose telephone number is (571)272-7682. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9 am- 6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Eason can be reached at 571-270-7230. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. VIJAY SHANKAR Primary Examiner Art Unit 2624 /VIJAY SHANKAR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2624
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 17, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12705814
MOTION PICTURE GENERATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12705845
Providing Augmented Reality View Based on Geographical Data
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700182
ENDOLUMINAL OBJECT CHARACTERIZATION USING 3D-RECONSTRUCTION
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700196
AUGMENTED REALITY-BASED TIME ADJUSTMENT
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12694609
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM FOR PROVIDING VIRTUAL SPACE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+8.5%)
2y 2m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1121 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month