Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/878,780

METHOD FOR CONTROLLING PULSE WITH MODULATION INVERTERS

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Dec 24, 2024
Priority
Jun 24, 2022 — DK PA202270338 +1 more
Examiner
DE LEON DOMENECH, RAFAEL O
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
442 granted / 502 resolved
+28.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
509
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
44.2%
+4.2% vs TC avg
§102
35.0%
-5.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 502 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
DETAILED ACTION This Office action is in response to the preliminary amendment filed on December 24, 2024. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Inventorship This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on December 24, 2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings were filed on December 24, 2024. These drawings are accepted by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because it claims “computer program comprising instructions which, when the program is executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out an operation [….]”, failing to claim a non-transitory computer readable medium or signals, therefore failing to comply with 35 U.S.C. 101 requirements. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-9 and 13-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by LETAS (U.S. Pub. No. 2019/0097520 A1, reference provided as part of the Information Disclosure Statement “IDS”). In re claim 1, LETAS discloses (Figs. 1-2 and 4-5) a method for controlling at least first and second PWM inverters (Para. 0045-0047), the method comprises: determining first and second periods of the first PWM inverter for operating the first PWM inverter with respective first and second switching patterns wherein the first and second switching patterns have different harmonic spectrums (Para. 0045-0047), and operating the first PWM inverter with the first and second switching patterns applied successively during the respective first and second periods determining first and second periods of the second PWM inverter for operating the second PWM inverter with the respective first and second switching patterns (Para. 0045-0047), and operating the second PWM inverter with the first and second switching patterns applied successively during the respective first and second periods of the second PWM inverter (Para. 0045-0047), wherein the first period of the first PWM inverter and the first period of the second PWM inverter are started at different start times (Para. 0045-0047). In re claim 2, LETAS discloses wherein the start times of the first periods of the first and second PWM inverters are predetermined or determined based on an externally generated trigger signal (Para. 0046). In re claim 3, LETAS discloses wherein the start time of the first period of the second PWM inverter is delayed relative to the start time of the first period of the first PWM inverter by the time length of the first period of the first PWM inverter (Para. 0055). In re claim 4, LETAS discloses wherein the different start times of the first periods of the first and second PWM inverters are determined from a random process (Para. 0045-0047). In re claim 5, LETAS discloses (Fig. 5) wherein at least the first periods of the first and second PWM inverters have equal lengths (Para. 0045). In re claim 6, LETAS discloses wherein in response to a predefined operational condition, such as a grid disturbance event, the method comprises shifting from operating the at least first PWM inverter with the first and second switching patterns, to operating the at least first PWM inverter solely with one of the first and second switching patterns (Para. 0045-0047). In re claim 7, LETAS discloses wherein in response to another predefined operational condition, such as a grid recovery event, the method comprises: shifting from operating the at least first PWM inverter solely with one of the first and second switching patterns, back to operating the at least first PWM inverter with the first and second switching patterns (Para. 0045-0047). In re claim 8, LETAS discloses (Fig. 4) wherein the first and second switching patterns are determined based on respective first and second switching frequencies, wherein the first and second switching frequencies are different (Para. 0043). In re claim 9, LETAS discloses (Figs. 1-2 and 4-5) plurality of PWM controllers configured for controlling at least a first and a second PWM inverter, wherein the PWM controllers comprises a data processor arranged to perform an operation (Para. 0045-0047), comprising: determining first and second periods of the first PWM inverter for operating the first PWM inverter with respective first and second switching patterns wherein the first and second switching patterns have different harmonic spectrums, and operating the first PWM inverter with the first and second switching patterns applied successively during the respective first and second periods. (Para. 0045-0047) determining first and second periods of the second PWM inverter for operating the second PWM inverter with the respective first and second switching patterns (Para. 0045-0047); operating the second PWM inverter with the first and second switching patterns applied successively during the respective first and second periods of the second PWM inverter (Para. 0045-0047); wherein the first period of the first PWM inverter and the first period of the second PWM inverter are started at different start times (Para. 0045-0047). In re claim 13, LETAS discloses (Figs. 1-2 and 3-4) a computer program comprising instructions which, when the program is executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out an operation for controlling at least a first and a second PWM inverter (Para. 0045-0047), comprising: determining first and second periods of the first PWM inverter for operating the first PWM inverter with respective first and second switching patterns wherein the first and second switching patterns have different harmonic spectrums (Para. 0045-0047), and operating the first PWM inverter with the first and second switching patterns applied successively during the respective first and second periods (Para. 0045-0047); determining first and second periods of the second PWM inverter for operating the second PWM inverter with the respective first and second switching patterns (Para. 0045-0047); operating the second PWM inverter with the first and second switching patterns applied successively during the respective first and second periods of the second PWM inverter (Para. 0045-0047); wherein the first period of the first PWM inverter and the first period of the second PWM inverter are started at different start times (Para. 0045-0047). In re claim 14, LETAS discloses a grid filter for smoothening the voltage output from the PWM inverter, wherein the grid filter is configured for operation at an operation frequency located between largest magnitude harmonics of the different harmonics of the different switching patterns (Para. 0045-0047). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAFAEL O. DE LEÓN DOMENECH whose telephone number is (571)270-0517. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 a.m. -5:00 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hammond Crystal can be reached at (571) 270-1682. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAFAEL O DE LEON DOMENECH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 24, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771239
ACTIVE PRE-CHARGE CIRCUIT FOR AVIONICS LRUS
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771244
RESONANT POWER CONVERTER AND CONVERSION CONTROL CIRCUIT AND CONVERSION CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763675
POWER CONVERSION CIRCUIT AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12756193
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CHANGING A TRANSFORMATION RATIO, AN IMPEDANCE, OR A VOLTAGE USED FOR EXCITATION
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12749975
Light-Load Recovery in a Multi-Level Converter
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+10.7%)
2y 1m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 502 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month