Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/882,035

FUSE LIFE EXPECTANCY PREDICTION DEVICE FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE BATTERY AND PREDICTION METHOD THEREOF

Final Rejection §DP
Filed
Sep 11, 2024
Priority
Nov 18, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0159436 +1 more
Examiner
HOLLINGTON, JERMELE M
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kia Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
71%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
797 granted / 924 resolved
+18.3% vs TC avg
Minimal -15% lift
Without
With
+-15.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
932
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
§102
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§112
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 924 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see page 3, filed July 23, 2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-14 under 35 U.S.C. 101 as statutory double patenting rejection have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,368. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-14 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim1-14 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,368. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the patent above covers the scope of the claimed invention. The following is the relationship between this application and U.S. Patent No. 12,111,368 [the difference is shown in italic, bold and underline]: Application 18/882,035: 1. A device for predicting a life expectancy of a fuse for a battery comprising a first battery and a second battery of an electric vehicle, the device comprising: a processor; a sensor configured to generate and output current information about current flowing in the fuse to the processor, wherein the fuse is disposed between the first battery and the second battery; and a memory connected to the processor; wherein the memory is configured to store program instructions which are executable by the processor to generate fuse-life expectancy information corresponding to the fuse based on time during which the current information exceeds a preset threshold value. U.S. Patent 12,111,368: 1. A device for predicting a life expectancy of a fuse for a battery comprising a first battery and a second battery of an electric vehicle, the device comprising: a processor; a sensor configured to generate and output current information about current flowing in the fuse to the processor, wherein the fuse is disposed between the first battery and the second battery; and a memory connected to the processor and configured to store a preset lookup table; wherein the memory is configured to store program instructions which are executable by the processor to generate fuse-life expectancy information corresponding to the fuse based on the preset lookup table and time corresponding to an excess when the current information exceeds a preset threshold value. 2. The device according to claim 1, wherein, when the current information is driving current information, the memory is configured to store program instructions for generating the fuse-life expectancy information based on a preset method by measuring a peak current and a peak time corresponding to the driving current information when the driving current information exceeds a preset driving threshold value, and the preset threshold value is the preset driving threshold value. 2. The device according to claim 1, wherein, when the current information is driving current information, the memory is configured to store program instructions for generating the fuse-life expectancy information based on a preset method by measuring a peak current and a peak time corresponding to the driving current information when the driving current information exceeds a preset driving threshold value, and the preset threshold value is the preset driving threshold value. 3. The device according to claim 2, wherein the memory is configured to store program instructions for cumulatively measuring the peak current and the peak time until the driving current information is lower than or equal to the preset driving threshold value, and generating the fuse-life expectancy information. 3. The device according to claim 2, wherein the memory is configured to store program instructions for cumulatively measuring the peak current and the peak time until the driving current information is lower than or equal to the preset driving threshold value, and generating the fuse-life expectancy information by looking up information corresponding to the cumulatively measured peak current and peak time from the preset lookup table. 4. The device according to claim 1, wherein, when the current information is quick-charging current information, the memory is configured to store program instructions for generating a quick-charging absolute current value corresponding to the quick-charging current information, and generating the fuse-life expectancy information based on a preset method by measuring a quick-charging current information and charging time when the quick-charging absolute current value exceeds a preset quick-charging threshold value, and the preset threshold value is an absolute value of the quick-charging current value. 4. The device according to claim 1, wherein, when the current information is quick-charging current information, the memory is configured to store program instructions for generating a quick-charging absolute current value corresponding to the quick-charging current information, and generating the fuse-life expectancy information based on a preset method by measuring a quick-charging current information and charging time when the quick-charging absolute current value exceeds a preset quick-charging threshold value, and the preset threshold value is an absolute value of the quick-charging current value. 5. The device according to claim 4, wherein the memory is configured to store program instructions for cumulatively measuring the quick-charging current information and the charging time until the quick charging is completed, and generating the fuse-life expectancy information. 5. The device according to claim 4, wherein the memory is configured to store program instructions for cumulatively measuring the quick-charging current information and the charging time until the quick charging is completed, and generating the fuse-life expectancy information by looking up information corresponding to the cumulatively measured quick-charging current information and charging time from the preset lookup table. 6. The device according to claim 1, wherein the memory is configured to further store program instructions for outputting a preset warning when the fuse-life expectancy information is lower than or equal to a preset warning reference. 6. The device according to claim 1, wherein the memory is configured to further store program instructions for outputting a preset warning when the fuse-life expectancy information is lower than or equal to a preset warning reference. 7. The device according to claim 6, wherein the memory is configured to store program instructions for detecting a warning level of the fuse-life expectancy information, and outputting a warning corresponding to the warning level. 7. The device according to claim 6, wherein the memory is configured to store program instructions for detecting a warning level of the fuse-life expectancy information, and outputting a warning corresponding to the warning level. 8. A method of predicting a life expectancy of a fuse used for a battery comprising a first battery and a second battery of an electric vehicle, the method comprising: generating information about current flowing in the fuse disposed between the first battery and the second battery; comparing the current information with a preset threshold value; and generating fuse-life expectancy information corresponding to the fuse based on time during which the current information exceeds the threshold value. 8. A method of predicting a life expectancy of a fuse used for a battery comprising a first battery and a second battery of an electric vehicle, the method comprising: generating information about current flowing in the fuse disposed between the first battery and the second battery; comparing the current information with a preset threshold value; and generating fuse-life expectancy information corresponding to the fuse based on a lookup table previously stored in a provided memory and time corresponding to an excess when the current information exceeds the threshold value. 9. The method according to claim 8, wherein, when the current information is driving current information, generating the fuse-life expectancy information comprises: measuring a peak current and a peak time corresponding to the driving current information when the driving current information exceeds a preset driving threshold value; and generating the fuse-life expectancy information based on a preset method using the peak current and the peak time; wherein the threshold value is the driving threshold value. 9. The method according to claim 8, wherein, when the current information is driving current information, generating the fuse-life expectancy information comprises: measuring a peak current and a peak time corresponding to the driving current information when the driving current information exceeds a preset driving threshold value; and generating the fuse-life expectancy information based on a preset method using the peak current and the peak time; wherein the threshold value is the driving threshold value. 10. The method according to claim 9, wherein generating the fuse-life expectancy information comprises: cumulatively measuring the peak current and the peak time until the driving current information is lower than or equal to the driving threshold value; and generating the fuse-life expectancy information. 10. The method according to claim 9, wherein generating the fuse-life expectancy information comprises: cumulatively measuring the peak current and the peak time until the driving current information is lower than or equal to the driving threshold value; and generating the fuse-life expectancy information by looking up information corresponding to the cumulatively measured peak current and peak time from the lookup table. 11. The method according to claim 8, wherein, when the current information is quick-charging current information, generating the fuse-life expectancy information comprises: generating a quick-charging absolute current value corresponding to the quick-charging current information; and generating the fuse-life expectancy information based on a preset method by measuring a quick-charging current information and charging time when the quick-charging absolute current value exceeds a preset quick-charging threshold value; wherein the threshold value is the quick-charging absolute current value. 11. The method according to claim 8, wherein, when the current information is quick-charging current information, generating the fuse-life expectancy information comprises: generating a quick-charging absolute current value corresponding to the quick-charging current information; and generating the fuse-life expectancy information based on a preset method by measuring a quick-charging current information and charging time when the quick-charging absolute current value exceeds a preset quick-charging threshold value; wherein the threshold value is the quick-charging absolute current value. 12. The method according to claim 11, wherein generating the fuse-life expectancy information further comprises: cumulatively measuring the quick-charging current information and the charging time until the quick charging is completed; and generating the fuse-life expectancy information. 12. The method according to claim 11, wherein generating the fuse-life expectancy information further comprises: cumulatively measuring the quick-charging current information and the charging time until the quick charging is completed; and generating the fuse-life expectancy information by looking up information corresponding to the cumulatively measured quick-charging current information and charging time from the lookup table. 13. The method according to claim 8, further comprising outputting a preset warning when the fuse-life expectancy information is lower than or equal to a preset warning reference. 13. The method according to claim 8, further comprising outputting a preset warning when the fuse-life expectancy information is lower than or equal to a preset warning reference. 14. The method according to claim 13, wherein outputting the warning comprises: detecting a warning level of the fuse-life expectancy information; and outputting a warning corresponding to the warning level. 14. The method according to claim 13, wherein outputting the warning comprises: detecting a warning level of the fuse-life expectancy information; and outputting a warning corresponding to the warning level. Conclusion Base on the amendment to the claims the following is being applied. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JERMELE M HOLLINGTON whose telephone number is (571)272-1960. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 7:00am-3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lee E Rodak can be reached at 571-270-5628. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JERMELE M HOLLINGTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 11, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP
Jul 23, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742836
MAGNETOIMPEDANCE SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742380
INTERFERENCE COMPENSATED CROSS-AXIAL MAGNETOMETER MEASUREMENTS
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742720
A MICROFLUIDIC DEVICE FOR DETECTING AND CHARACTERIZING AT LEAST ONE ANALYTE, FOR EXAMPLE A CELL, IN A SAMPLE FLUID
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12732162
A METHOD OF PRECHARGING A SWITCHABLE FILTER
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730160
SYSTEM AND METHOD OF MONITORING FUSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
71%
With Interview (-15.4%)
2y 6m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 924 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month