Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/883,316

SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE AND MEMORY SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 12, 2024
Priority
Mar 19, 2024 — JP 2024-044085
Examiner
PHAM, LY D
Art Unit
2827
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
KIOXIA Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allowance Rate
969 granted / 1031 resolved
+26.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1045
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
§103
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
§102
36.7%
-3.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1031 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In the last two lines of both claims 1 and 15, the term “can be” in the limitation “the predetermined time period can be changed according to an instruction from the memory controller” is considered among the impermissible claim languages (e.g. can, could, shall, should, would, may, might, must, etc…) as it is considered as indefinite claim language. The office suggests the limitation be amended as follows: “when instructed, the predetermined time period is changed according to an instruction from the memory controller”. Claims 2 – 14 and 16 – 20 are also rejected for being dependent from their respective independent claims. Appropriate corrections are required in order to overcome this type of rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LY D PHAM whose telephone number is (571)272-1793. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amir Zarabian can be reached at 571-272-1852. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LY D. PHAM Examiner Art Unit 2827 /LY D PHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2827 March 24, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 12, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12670945
APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR TRACKING WORD LINE ACCESSES
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12670954
RESISTIVE RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (RRAM) ARCHITECTURE AND METHOD
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665022
OPTIMIZATION OF SOFT BIT WINDOWS BASED ON SIGNAL AND NOISE CHARACTERISTICS OF MEMORY CELLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658245
RAPID TAG INVALIDATION CIRCUIT
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658247
RAPID POWER READY SIGNALING IN A MEMORY ARRAY
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+3.3%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1031 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month