Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/884,268

METHODS OF FABRICATING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 13, 2024
Examiner
PERSAUD, DEORAM
Art Unit
2882
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
572 granted / 748 resolved
+8.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
784
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
46.3%
+6.3% vs TC avg
§102
34.5%
-5.5% vs TC avg
§112
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 748 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 13 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Park et al. [US 2022/0326617 A1]. Regarding claim 13, Park et al. discloses a method of fabricating a semiconductor device (paragraph [0002]), the method comprising: forming a photoresist layer on an upper surface of a wafer (Fig. 1 item 300, see also paragraph [0027]); exposing a portion of the photoresist layer to light to form an exposed region of the photoresist layer (LP, see also paragraph [0028]); producing a first developer having a first temperature (paragraph [0042]) by adjusting a temperature of a developer (paragraph [0055]) by using a temperature adjuster (Figs. 4 and 5 item 456) that is connected to a first nozzle through a pipe, wherein the first nozzle is above the upper surface of the wafer (paragraph [0027]); providing the first developer to the photoresist layer from the first nozzle; etching a portion of the exposed region by using the first developer (paragraph [0028]); producing a second developer having a second temperature by adjusting the temperature of the developer (paragraph [0048]) by using the temperature adjuster (455), wherein the second temperature is lower than the first temperature (paragraph [0047] teaches second developer with a second temperature may be lower than the first temperature); providing the second developer to the photoresist layer from the first nozzle; and etching a remaining portion of the exposed region by using the second developer (as shown in Figs. 9 and 10). Regarding claim 19, Park et al. discloses wherein the first temperature is from 20° C. to 40° C., and the second temperature is from 5° C. to 25° C (paragraphs [0054] and [0055]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-12, 14-18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Park et al. in view of Miura et al. [US 2021/0333707 A1]. Regarding claims 1, 14-18 and 20, Park et al. discloses a method of fabricating a semiconductor device (paragraph [0002]), the method comprising: forming a photoresist layer on an upper surface of a wafer (Fig. 1 item 300, see also paragraph [0027]); exposing a portion of the photoresist layer to light to form an exposed region of the photoresist layer and an unexposed region of the photoresist layer (LP, see also paragraph [0028]); etching a first portion of the exposed region by using a first developer (paragraph [0028]) having a first temperature (paragraph [0042]); and etching (as shown in Figs. 9 and 10) a second portion of the exposed region by using a second developer having a second temperature (paragraph [0048]) that is lower than the first temperature (paragraph [0047] teaches second developer with a second temperature may be lower than the first temperature). Park et al. does not teach lowering a temperature of the photoresist layer by using cooling gas. However, Miura et al. discloses a nozzle unit for use in a liquid treatment apparatus (Fig. 1) that performs a liquid treatment on a substrate wherein a cooling gas in supplied to the surface of the substrate such that it is possible to improve the uniformity of the line width (CD) of the resist film (R) in the processed (developed) workpiece (W) (paragraph [0155], see also Fig. 12). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide a cooling gas in supplied to the surface of the substrate, as taught by Miura et al. in the method of Park et al. because such a modification provides improvement of the uniformity of the line width (CD) of the resist film (R) in the processed (developed) workpiece (W) (paragraph [0155] of Miura et al.). Regarding claim 2, Miura et al. discloses further comprising: drying and removing the first developer by using the cooling gas while the lowering the temperature of the photoresist layer by using the cooling gas (as shown in Fig. 12, see also paragraph [0155]). Regarding claim 3, Park et al. discloses wherein the first temperature is from 20° C. to 40° C., and the second temperature is from 5° C. to 25° C (paragraphs [0054] and [0055]). Regarding claim 4, Park et al. in view of Miura et al. discloses further comprising: providing the first developer (paragraph [0042] of Park et al.) to the photoresist layer from a first nozzle that is above the upper surface of the wafer (paragraph [0027] of Park et al.), before the etching the first portion of the exposed region; and providing the cooling gas to the photoresist layer from a second nozzle that is above the upper surface of the wafer, before the lowering the temperature of the photoresist layer (as shown in Fig. 12, see also paragraph [0155] of Miura et al.). Regarding claim 5, Park et al. discloses further comprising: providing the second developer (paragraph [0048]) to the photoresist layer from the first nozzle, before the etching the second portion of the exposed region (as shown in Figs. 9 and 10). Regarding claim 6, Park et al. discloses further comprising: producing the first developer having the first temperature by adjusting a temperature of a developer by using a first temperature adjuster that is connected to the first nozzle through a first pipe, before the providing the first developer to the photoresist layer from the first nozzle; and producing the second developer having the second temperature by adjusting the temperature of the developer by using the first temperature adjuster, before the providing the second developer to the photoresist layer from the first nozzle (as shown in Figs. 4 and 5, see also paragraphs [0047]-[0048]). Regarding claim 7, Park et al. in view of Miura et al. discloses further comprising: providing the second developer to the photoresist layer from a third nozzle that is above the upper surface of the wafer, before the etching the second portion of the exposed region (as shown in Figs. 4 and 5, see also paragraphs [0047]-[0048] of Park et al. and Fig. 1 of Miura et al.). Regarding claim 8, Park et al. discloses further comprising: producing the first developer having the first temperature by adjusting a temperature of a developer by using a first temperature adjuster that is connected to the first nozzle through a first pipe, before the providing the first developer to the photoresist layer from the first nozzle; and producing the second developer having the second temperature by adjusting the temperature of the developer by using a second temperature adjuster connected to the third nozzle through a second pipe, before the providing the second developer to the photoresist layer from the third nozzle (as shown in Figs. 4 and 5, see also paragraphs [0047]-[0048] of Park et al. and Fig. 1 of Miura et al.). Regarding claim 9 and 10, Park et al. discloses further comprising: heating the wafer to increase the temperature of the photoresist layer while the etching the first portion of the exposed region by using the first developer, wherein the heating the wafer includes heating an edge region of the wafer to increase a temperature of an edge region of the photoresist layer. (paragraph [0042]). Regarding claim 11, Miura et al. discloses wherein the cooling gas includes nitrogen (paragraph [007]). Regarding claim 12, Park et al. discloses wherein the etching of the second portion of the exposed region by using the second developer having the second temperature includes maintaining the unexposed region of the photoresist layer without etching (paragraph [0028] and [0047]-[0048]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DEORAM PERSAUD whose telephone number is (571)270-5476. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Minh-Toan Ton can be reached at 571-272-2303. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DEORAM PERSAUD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2882
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596307
IMAGING OPTICAL UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585199
OVERLAY CORRECTION METHOD, AND EXPOSURE METHOD AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE MANUFACTURING METHOD INCLUDING OVERLAY CORRECTION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585204
MEASUREMENT DEVICE, LITHOGRAPHY SYSTEM AND EXPOSURE APPARATUS, AND CONTROL METHOD, OVERLAY MEASUREMENT METHOD AND DEVICE MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585193
OPTICAL SYSTEM FOR A LITHOGRAPHIC PROJECTION EXPOSURE APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12572083
INTENSITY ORDER DIFFERENCE BASED METROLOGY SYSTEM, LITHOGRAPHIC APPARATUS, AND METHODS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 748 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month