Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/884,754

ULTRA SHORT THROW PROJECTION LENS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 13, 2024
Examiner
VU, PHU
Art Unit
2871
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sun Yang Optics Development Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
858 granted / 1006 resolved
+17.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1032
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
82.3%
+42.3% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1006 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chen TW 202111379. Regarding claim 1, Chen teaches an ultra short throw projection lens, includes a first lens group 11 (fig. 2 lens group 140)and a second lens group 22 (lens group 150), the image source IMA is first projected into an intermediate image by the second lens group 22, then the intermediate image is projected into a final image on the screen side by the first lens group 11, which complies with 0.23≤TR≤0.45 (.22 page 7 last paragraph before table) and 1.6≤|IMH2|/|IMH1|≤3, (see table [0053] RF/IMH = 2.9) TR is the throw ratio of the ultra-short throw projection lens, IMH1 is the maximum image height of the image source, IMH2 is the maximum image height of the intermediate image, the second lens group includes an aperture A, and the aperture A has an F/# between 1.6˜3.2 (aperture 1.8 see page 7 last paragraph before table 1). Regarding claim 3, Chen teaches the ultra short throw projection lens as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first lens group 11 includes a first aspherical lens (fig. 2 L6 see page 5 2nd last paragraph) with a concave surface facing the image source side, and a second aspherical lens (fig. 2 L4 see page 5 2nd last paragraph) with a concave surface facing the imaging side. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen TW 202111379. Regarding claim 9, Chen teaches the ultra short throw projection lens as claimed in claim 1 but does not teach wherein the ultra short throw projection lens further includes a reflective element located between the first lens group and the second lens group for changing the direction of the optical axis. However placing a reflective element between lens groups to change direction of the optical axis for the purpose of making the device more compact would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art and examiner takes official notice of this. Therefore, it would have been obvious to an ordinarily skilled artisan before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Chen to include reflective element between lens groups to change direction of the optical axis for the purpose of making the device more compact. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHU VU whose telephone number is (571)272-1562. The examiner can normally be reached 11:00 - 7:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Carruth can be reached at 571-272-9791. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHU VU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681313
HEAD-MOUNTABLE DEVICES WITH MODULAR LENS ASSEMBLIES
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12663570
System and Method to Eliminate Incident Light Reflection from Displays in Cameras
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12645111
Method for Producing a Complex Sheet and a Display Panel Comprising the Complex Sheet
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12645013
POLARIZERS AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICES
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12638678
OPTICAL FUNCTIONAL FILM FOR HEAD-UP DISPLAY, OPTICAL LAMINATE, FUNCTIONAL GLASS, AND HEAD-UP DISPLAY SYSTEM
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+9.3%)
2y 2m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1006 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month