Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/886,151

SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND MEDIA FOR GENERATING DIGITAL IMAGES USING LOW BIT DEPTH IMAGE SENSOR DATA

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Sep 16, 2024
Priority
Mar 04, 2022 — continuation of 12/094,087
Examiner
DAGNEW, MEKONNEN D
Art Unit
2638
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
610 granted / 734 resolved
+21.1% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
758
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§103
63.7%
+23.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 734 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-20 of prior U.S. Patent No. US 12, 094, 087 B2. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Khemka et al. (US 11,582,431 B1) teaches an image sensor captures an image at a first bit-depth. The image sensor may be, for example, an HDR image sensor that captures images at a high bit-depth (e.g., a bit-depth of 24 bits). The image sensor may be an HDR sensor having a bit depth of, for example, 20 bits, 24 bits, 26 bits, 32 bits, and so on. At operation 204, the image sensor (e.g., a processing device at the image sensor) compresses the image from the first bit depth to a lower second bit depth (e.g., from a bit-depth of 24 bits to a bit-depth of 12 bits) (Col. 8, Paragraph II). Frank et al. (US 2012/0206470 A1) teaches an image signal processor may include a first data path of a relatively high bit depth, front-end image processing logic, and a second data path of a relatively low bit depth. The first data path may receive HDR image data from an image sensor. The front-end image processing logic may convert the HDR image data into lower-bit-depth image data, while preserving highlight details and/or shadow details of the HDR image, by using at least two transfer functions that preserve different subsets of the high dynamic range. The second data path may output this lower-bit-depth image data to other image processing logic for additional image processing (¶0007). Su et al. (US 2016/0021391 A1) teaches prediction operation from low bit depth BL image data to high bit depth VDR image data, contouring artifacts often occur in the high bit depth VDR image data as a result of one-to-many mappings in the prediction operation (¶0004). Contacts Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MEKONNEN D DAGNEW whose telephone number is (571)270-5092. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:00AM-5:00PM M-Th. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lin Ye can be reached on 571-272-7372. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MEKONNEN D DAGNEW/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2638
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 16, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP
Apr 10, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12615447
IMAGING ELEMENT AND IMAGING DEVICE
1y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12593143
SOLID-STATE IMAGING DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586142
IMAGE CAPTURING METHOD AND DISPLAY METHOD FOR RECOGNIZING A RELATIONSHIP AMONG A PLURALITY OF IMAGES DISPLAYED ON A DISPLAY SCREEN
1y 8m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585173
LENS BARREL
1y 6m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581022
DATA CREATION METHOD AND DATA CREATION PROGRAM
4y 1m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.7%)
2y 6m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 734 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month