Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/887,386

PIXEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 17, 2024
Priority
Sep 27, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0131206
Examiner
LAM, NELSON C
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
69%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
417 granted / 691 resolved
-1.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
727
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
58.5%
+18.5% vs TC avg
§102
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
§112
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 691 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1 and 15 are amended. Claims 1-20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2, 10 and 14-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (US 20190371232). As per claim 1, Kim discloses a pixel (Fig. 6; [0099]) comprising: a light emitting element (#200) including a first electrode (i.e., anode electrode), and a second electrode (i.e., cathode electrode) connected to a third power line (i.e., ground voltage line) which transmits a third power voltage (#322; [0102]; [0124]); a pulse width modulator (#330) which controls an emission time duration of the light emitting element (#200) in a frame period based on a data voltage ([0070]; [0131]; [0156]; [0204]), wherein the pulse width modulator (Fig. 7, #330) is connected to a first power line (#VDD line) which transmit a first power voltage (#VDD; [0110]); and a constant current generator (#320) which provides a driving current having a constant level to the light emitting element (#200) based on a constant current generation voltage applied thereto ([0102]; [0125]), wherein the constant current generator (#320) includes a second driving transistor (#325) including a gate electrode connected to a third node, a first electrode connected to a second power line (#VDD line) which transmits a second power voltage (Fig. 8, i.e., 0V at INITIALIZATION DURATION), and a second electrode connected to the first electrode of the light emitting element (#200; [0102]), wherein (Fig. 8 discloses) a voltage level of the third power voltage (i.e., VSS = 0V) in an emission period (#Emission) in which the light emitting element emits light is different from a voltage level of the third power voltage (i.e., VSS = 10V) in at least a portion of a non-emission period (#SENSING DURATION) in which the light emitting element does not emit light ([0156]). However, Kim does not teach the constant current generator includes a second driving transistor including a first electrode connected to a second power line which is separate from the first power line and transmits a second power voltage independent of the first power voltage. Official Notice is taken that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill to have the constant current generator includes a second driving transistor including a first electrode connected to a second power line which is separate from the first power line and transmits a second power voltage independent of the first power voltage since it has been held that making parts separable is common practice requiring only ordinary skill in the art. In re Dulberg, 289 F.2d 522, 523, 129 USPQ 348, 349 (CCPA 1961). As per claims 2 and 16, Kim discloses the pixel (display device) of claim 1 (claim 15), wherein the third power voltage has a low voltage level (i.e. 0V) in the emission period ([0156]), and (Fig. 8 discloses) the third power voltage has a third high voltage level (i.e., VSS = 10V), which is higher than the low voltage level (i.e. 0V), in at least the portion of the non-emission period (#SENSING DURATION). As per claim 10, Kim discloses the pixel of claim 1, wherein the constant current generator (#320) further includes a second capacitor (#312) including a first electrode connected to the third node, and a second electrode connected to the second power line (#321). As per claim 14, Kim discloses the pixel of claim 1, wherein the light emitting element (#200) is a micro-light emitting diode ([0064]). As per claim 15, Kim discloses a display device (Fig. 12, #1200; [0197]) comprising: a display panel (#1000) including a plurality of pixels ([0197]-[0198]); a scan driver (#830) which sequentially provides scan signals to the plurality of pixels ([0074]-[0075]; [0200]); and a data driver (#820) which provides a data voltage and a constant current generation voltage to each of the plurality of pixels ([0204]; [0206]), wherein each of the plurality of pixels includes: a light emitting element (#200) including a first electrode (i.e., anode electrode), and a second electrode (i.e., cathode electrode) connected to a third power line (i.e., ground voltage line) which transmits a third power voltage (#322; [0102]; [0124]); a pulse width modulator (#330) which controls an emission time duration of the light emitting element (#200) in a frame period based on a data voltage ([0070]; [0131]; [0156]; [0204]), wherein the pulse width modulator (Fig. 7, #330) is connected to a first power line (#VDD line) which transmit a first power voltage (#VDD; [0110]); and a constant current generator (#320) which provides a driving current having a constant level to the light emitting element (#200) based on the constant current generation voltage ([0102]; [0125]), wherein the constant current generator (#320) includes a second driving transistor (#325) including a gate electrode connected to a third node, a first electrode connected to a second power line (i.e., VDD line) which transmits a second power voltage (Fig. 8, i.e., 0 V at INITIALIZATION DURATION), and a second electrode connected to the first electrode of the light emitting element (#200; [0102]), wherein (Fig. 8 discloses) a voltage level of the third power voltage (i.e., VSS = 0V) in an emission period (#Emission) in which the light emitting element emits light is different from a voltage level of the third power voltage (i.e., VSS = 10V) in at least a portion of a non-emission period (#SENSING DURATION) in which the light emitting element does not emit light ([0156]). However, Kim does not teach the constant current generator includes a second driving transistor including a first electrode connected to a second power line which is separate from the first power line and transmits a second power voltage independent of the first power voltage. Official Notice is taken that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill to have the constant current generator includes a second driving transistor including a first electrode connected to a second power line which is separate from the first power line and transmits a second power voltage independent of the first power voltage since it has been held that making parts separable is common practice requiring only ordinary skill in the art. In re Dulberg, 289 F.2d 522, 523, 129 USPQ 348, 349 (CCPA 1961). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-9, 11-13 and 17-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of a pixel comprising a light emitting element; a pulse width modulator which controls an emission time duration of the light emitting element in a frame period based on a data voltage; and a constant current generator which provides a driving current having a constant level to the light emitting element does not teach or fairly suggest the second power voltage has a second high voltage level in the emission period, and the second power voltage has a medium voltage level which is higher than the low voltage level and lower than the second high voltage level in at least a portion of the non-emission period, wherein the pulse width modulator includes: a first driving transistor including a gate electrode connected to a first node, a first electrode connected to a fourth node, and a second electrode connected to a fifth node; a first write transistor including a gate electrode which receives a scan signal, a first electrode connected to a data line which transmits the data voltage, and a second electrode connected to the fourth node; a first compensation transistor including a gate electrode which receives the scan signal, a first electrode connected to the fifth node, and a second electrode connected to the first node; and a first capacitor including a first electrode which receives a sweep signal, and a second electrode connected to the first node, wherein the constant current generator further includes: a second write transistor including a gate electrode which receives a write gate signal, a first electrode connected to a data line which transmits the constant current generation voltage, and a second electrode connected to a second node; a second compensation transistor including a gate electrode which receives a compensation gate signal, a first electrode connected to the second electrode of the second driving transistor, and a second electrode connected to the third node; and a third capacitor including a first electrode connected to the second node, and a second electrode connected to the third node. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1 and 15 have been considered but are moot because of the new grounds of rejection as presented above. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Nelson Lam whose telephone number is (571)272-8044. The examiner can normally be reached 1pm-9pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ke Xiao can be reached at 571 272-7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Nelson Lam/Examiner, Art Unit 2627 /KE XIAO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Aug 15, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 07, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 20, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 07, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 01, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743990
DISPLAY CIRCUIT, DISPLAY METHOD, DISPLAY APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12731531
PIXEL DRIVING CIRCUIT AND METHOD, AND DISPLAY PANEL
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12711904
STAGE CIRCUIT OF GATE DRIVER AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12706022
POWER MANAGER CONTROLLING SUPPLY OF DRIVING VOLTAGES PREVENTING DISPLAY PANEL DAMAGE
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706051
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE INCLUDING MULTIPLE CASCADED SHIFT REGISTER UNITS, PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
69%
With Interview (+8.8%)
3y 4m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 691 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month