Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/887,628

TERMINAL DEVICE AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 17, 2024
Priority
Sep 18, 2023 — GB 2314217.7
Examiner
AHN, SUNG S
Art Unit
2631
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Nokia Technologies Oy
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
367 granted / 468 resolved
+16.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
7 currently pending
Career history
478
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
79.9%
+39.9% vs TC avg
§102
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
§112
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 468 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. PGPub. No. 20230085960 to Caglayan et al. in further view of U.S. PAT. No. 11734538 to Frankel et al. As to Claim 1, Caglayan discloses a terminal device, comprising (Fig. 3, Fig. 4, paragraph [0008], wireless power transmitter/receiver): a first circuitry coupled to an antenna and configured for modulation based on the dual frequency signal received via the antenna, wherein a first frequency part of the dual frequency signal matches the antenna resonance frequency and is used for charging an energy storage of the termina device, and a second frequency part of the dual frequency is used for performing the modulation at a mismatched frequency of an antenna impedance (Fig. 3, Fig. 4, paragraph [0029, 0038, 0039, 0043, 0044, 0045], where the dual band (different frequency band) is used for the power transfer and harvesting/charging the power from one band (matched with specific frequency) through the power harvesting circuit (first circuit - diode and capacitor to resonant at specific frequency) and modulating backscatter signal through the switch for other band (unmatched frequency to the antenna resonance/impedance for power harvesting)). a second circuitry coupled to the first circuitry and configure to control a state of the first circuitry for performing modulation (Fig. 3, Fig. 4, paragraph [0029, 0038, 0039, 0043, 0044, 0045], where the control circuit/MCU (second circuit) controls the modulation connected through the power harvesting circuit (first circuit - diode and capacitor to resonant at specific frequency)). Caglayan disclose all of the subject matter as described above (Fig. 3, Fig. 4, paragraph [0029, 0038, 0039, 0043, 0044, 0045]) except for the BPSK modulation. However, it is well known in art to apply various modulation schemes for date rate and different channel environment. Also Frankel in the same field of endeavor teaches the dual band transceiver for harvesting the power and modulating various types including phase-shift keying, frequency shift keying, amplitude modulation, amplitude shift keying, on-off keying, quadrature amplitude modulation, Gaussian frequency shift keying, continuous phase modulation, etc. which implicitly includes the BPSK (Fig. 2, Col. 4 line 43-58, Col. 5 lines 18-21, Col. 14 lines 31-44, Col. 15 lines 11-22). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinarily skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use BSPK modulation as taught by Frankel to modify the device of Caglayan to enhance the communication device supporting various types of modulation schemes (Frankel – Col. 21 lines 27-35). As to Claim 19, Caglayan in view of Frankel discloses the terminal device where in the antenna is a single resonance antenna (Caglayan - Fig. 3, Fig. 4, paragraph [0038], having single antenna for power harvesting)(Frankel - Fig. 2, Col. 5 lines 18-21, single antenna is used for dual-band power harvesting transceivers). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art of record fail to anticipate or render obvious step of the third circuitry coupled to the antenna and configured for an on-off-key (OOK) modulation based on a single frequency signal received via the antenna resonance frequency, wherein the second circuitry is coupled to the third circuitry and configured to control a state of the third circuitry for performing the OOK modulation. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUNG S AHN whose telephone number is (571)270-3706. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F: 9-6. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hannah Wang can be reached on 571-272-9018. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /SUNG S AHN/Examiner, Art Unit 2631 (571)-270-3706 sung.ahn@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 17, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12609733
ESTABLISHING A CONNECTION FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 1m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12592748
RECONFIGURABLE INTELLIGENT SURFACE OPTIMIZATION AND CONTROL SIGNALING
1y 8m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580800
Orthogonal Multiple Access and Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access
2y 0m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12568001
INFORMATION REPORTING METHOD AND APPARATUS, FIRST DEVICE, AND SECOND DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12556232
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
1y 6m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+12.2%)
2y 9m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 468 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month