Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/887,861

VEHICLE TOWING DRIVING CONTROL METHOD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 17, 2024
Examiner
LEWIS, TISHA D
Art Unit
3619
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kia Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1075 granted / 1227 resolved
+35.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1258
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
§102
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
§112
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1227 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/10/25 has been entered. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Claim 16 is pending in the application. Claims 1-15 have been cancelled. -The 112(b) rejection has been withdrawn due to examiner clarifying the limitation “ABS control” as recited in claim 16. -The 103 rejection has been withdrawn due to applicant amending claim 16 with limitations not disclosed by the prior art of record used in the rejection. Imamura ‘600 used as secondary prior art of rejection in combination with GB’492 increases driving force of rear towing vehicle wheel to control slip of front towing vehicle wheel. Therefore, GB in view of Imamura does not disclose increasing driving force (distribution ratio) of towed vehicle (wheel) as recited. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 16 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. -Claim 16 recites the limitation “wherein a control to increase the driving force of the towed vehicle is performed even when the wheel of the towed vehicle does not slip,….” The limitation “a control to increase the driving force of towed vehicle” seems to suggest that the driving force of vehicle itself is increased instead of the wheel as recited in lines 11-12 of claim “increasing a driving force distribution ratio of a non-slipping wheel” (also as shown in Figure 3, S112 and S113). Examiner suggest applicant amend the limitation to recite “wherein a control to increase the driving force of the towed vehicle wheel is performed even when the wheel of the towed vehicle does not slip,….” to clarify that the “wheel” driving force of towed vehicle is being increased and not the towed vehicle itself. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 16 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Based on the rejection, reasons for allowance will not be indicated at this time. Conclusion There is no additional prior art made of record and relied upon as the examiner considers the previous prior art cited and used in rejections most pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TISHA D LEWIS whose telephone number is (571)272-7093. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 8:30am to 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anna M Momper can be reached at 571-270-5788. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Tdl /TISHA D LEWIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3619 January 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 17, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jul 23, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 06, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Dec 10, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 21, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601395
ELECTRIC AXLE DRIVE FOR AN AXLE OF A MOTOR VEHICLE, IN PARTICULAR OF AN AUTOMOBILE, AND A MOTOR VEHICLE, IN PARTICULAR AN AUTOMOBILE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600357
COMPUTER SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592441
VIBRATION ISOLATORS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE-BATTERY ENCLOSURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592440
BATTERY PACK CASING HAVING CRUSH RESISTANCE AND THERMAL INSULATION FOR ELECTRIFIED VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590867
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING CONTINUOUSLY VARIABLE TRANSMISSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+9.5%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1227 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month