Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/888,551

VEHICLE AIR-CONDITIONING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 18, 2024
Priority
Mar 25, 2022 — JP 2022-050176 +1 more
Examiner
SCHULT, ALLEN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Denso Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
384 granted / 567 resolved
+7.7% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+31.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
588
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.4%
+13.4% vs TC avg
§102
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 567 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Application Claims 1-7 are pending and have been examined in this application. This communication is the first action on the merits. The Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) filed on 09/18/2024 has been considered by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 4-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by JP2013166410A to Ukita. A) As per Claim 4, Ukita teaches a vehicle air-conditioning device (Ukita: Figure 1) comprising: an air conditioning case (Ukita: Figure 1, Item 11) defining an air passage for air to be blown into a vehicle compartment of a vehicle; and a heating device (Ukita: Figure 1, Item 12) for heating air flowing through the air passage, wherein the air conditioning case is formed with a defroster opening (Ukita: Figure 1, Item 20) for blowing air toward an inner surface of a front windshield of the vehicle, and side-face opening (Ukita: Figure 1, Item 16) for blowing air into the vehicle compartment from end parts in a left-right direction of the vehicle, a defroster door (Ukita: Figure 1, Item 21) for opening and closing the defroster opening and a face door (Ukita: Figure 1, Item 17) for opening and closing the side-face opening are provided inside the air conditioning case, a gap opening (Ukita: Figure 2, gap shown at Items 25-26 & 17b) for communication between upstream and downstream of the face door in an air flow direction in a face closed state, in which the face door closes the side-face opening, is formed adjacent to the side-face opening, the air conditioning case has a ventilation structure in which, in the face closed state, air that has passed through the heating device is guided to the defroster opening along an opening plane of the gap opening, and air that has passed around the heating device flows in a direction which intersects with the opening plane of the gap opening, and the gap opening is configured to open and close (Ukita: Figure 2, gap shown at Items 25-26 & 17b; Item 17 can close gap by blocking Item 24). B) As per Claim 5, Ukita teaches that the air conditioning case defines a cold-air bypass passage (Ukita: Figure 1, portion of airflow not through Item 12 but to the right within Item 11) for allowing air to flow while bypassing the heating device, and a defroster passage (Ukita: Figure 1, Item 14) for guiding air that has passed through at least one of the heating device and the cold-air bypass passage to the defroster opening, the cold-air bypass passage is located adjacent to the defroster passage and extends along a partition wall (Ukita: Figure 1, wall of Item 11) provided between the cold-air bypass passage and the defroster passage, and the partition wall extends in a direction which intersects with the opening plane of the gap opening. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3 & 6-7 allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Closest prior art of Ukita does not teach the sliding door and it would not be obvious to add a sliding door to Ukita as the face door needs to rotate to block either the face opening or the passage. No other single reference or combination of references was found to read on all of the claims of Claim 1. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALLEN SCHULT whose telephone number is (571)272-8511. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, HELENA KOSANOVIC can be reached at 571-272-9059. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Allen R. B. Schult/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3762
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 18, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747888
AIR CLEANER
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12723774
BLOW-OUT UNIT AND AIR CONDITIONING APPARATUS
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12723775
FOUNDATION VENT COVER
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12710196
BUMPER FOR PORTABLE AIR CONDITIONER
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12707928
SUBSTRATE CONTAINER WITH MECHANICALLY ACTUATED EXHAUST VALVE
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+31.2%)
3y 1m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 567 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month