Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/889,598

DATA-INFORMED METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRACKING THE PERFORMANCE OF AIRBORNE OBJECTS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 19, 2024
Examiner
ARTHUR JEANGLAUDE, GERTRUDE
Art Unit
3661
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Careband Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allow Rate
1410 granted / 1518 resolved
+40.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1544
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
§103
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§102
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1518 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 44 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 44 recites the limitation "the flight data" in line 13. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 44 recites the limitation "the low power wide area network" in line 13. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3, 5-6, 9-11, 13, 18, 21, 27, 32, 40-41, 49, 52-54 allowed. The prior art fails to disclose A method for assessing a bird, the method comprising: configuring an electronic device to be attached to the bird, the electronic device comprising a microcontroller and a communication module that cooperate together to: acquire, from a plurality of sensors, at least one of inertial data, environmental data and bird physiological data; and acquire bird geoposition data from at least one of a terrestrial system and an extraterrestrial system; upon allowing the bird to become airborne, operating the electronic device to convert the acquired at least one of inertial, environmental, bird physiological and bird geoposition data into flight data of the airborne bird; acquiring observational data about the bird; using the communication module to exchange the flight data and the observational data between the electronic device and an operations center over a communication network; and analyzing at least one performance metric of the bird based the exchanged flight data and observational data. Nor does the prior art disclose A machine learning-based system for analyzing a flight path of a bird, the system comprising: a plurality of sensors comprising an inertial measurement unit, at least one physiological sensor and at least one environmental sensor; a communication module configured to operate using a plurality of modes of communication one of which comprises a low power wide area network; and at least one microcontroller signally cooperative with the plurality of sensors and the communication module to exchange information therebetween, the at least one microcontroller comprising at least one processor and a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing machine-readable instructions that cause the at least one processor to: acquire first sensor data from the inertial measurement unit, second sensor data from the at least one physiological sensor and third sensor data from the at least one environmental sensor; acquire, using the communication module, location data from at least one of a terrestrial system and an extraterrestrial system; using a trained machine learning model that correlates the acquired sensor and location data to determine at least one performance metric of the bird, and transmit, using at least the low power wide area network portion of the communication module, the determined at least one performance metric to a user. These limitations in combination are neither taught nor obvious by the prior art of record. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Norris (U.S. Pub No. 20150230450) discloses an intrusion system can be configured to includes a detection module comprising a processing module and a sensor having an output coupled to the processing module, wherein the detection module is configured to detect an object in a predetermined area and to determine a position of the detected object in the predetermined area; an ultrasonic generator comprising an oscillator configured to generate an ultrasonic signal; and an ultrasonic emitter coupled to the ultrasonic generator configured to launch an ultrasonic wave toward the position of the detected object. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GERTRUDE ARTHUR JEANGLAUDE whose telephone number is (571)272-6954. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday, 7:30-8:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ramya P Burgess can be reached at 571-272-6011. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GERTRUDE ARTHUR JEANGLAUDE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3661
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602955
VEHICLE TERMINAL AND CALCULATION SERVER FOR CALCULATING SAFE DRIVING INDEX BASED ON LONGITUDINAL ACCELERATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595778
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR OPTIMIZING OPERATING SWING OF VERTICAL SHAFT SUSPENDED HYDROGENERATOR UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594840
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RECOVERING FROM TORQUE REDUCTION CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594842
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ELECTRIC MACHINE PEAK POWER MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589742
Systems and Methods for Adjusting a Driving Path Using Occluded Regions
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+4.3%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1518 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month