Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/890,920

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ENCODING RAN PARAMETERS OVER E2 INTERFACE USING E2SM-RC FOR TRAFFIC STEERING-BASED SLA OPTIMIZATION UPON CELL SHUTDOWN FOR ENERGY SAVINGS ACTIVATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 20, 2024
Priority
Sep 25, 2023 — provisional 63/584,998
Examiner
LEE, JUSTIN YE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Mavenir Systems Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
573 granted / 715 resolved
+20.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
725
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§103
56.6%
+16.6% vs TC avg
§102
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 715 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 10/17/24 and 3/27/25 are being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings are objected to because the submitted drawings is unclear/hard to read and without labeling the number of the drawing. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 and 7-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Wang et al. (US 2022/0407664 A1). Consider claim 1, Wang teaches a method of implementing an optimal handover of a user equipment (UE) in an Open Radio Access Network (O-RAN) system from a first serving cell subject to a shutdown to an optimal target cell for the UE before executing the shutdown (abstract and paragraph 30), comprising: providing an event trigger style for an event trigger used to trigger an event in an E2 node of the O-RAN system when a configuration change is ongoing within the E2 node (Fig. 8, step 304 and paragraph 129-131, the list of cells to be activated and deactivated is updated based on information exchanged), wherein the event trigger style is provided as radio intelligent controller (RIC) Event Trigger Definition information element (IE) Style Type 5 (paragraph 96 and Table 1 and paragraph 8-9, RIC style type 5 is dual connectivity where the RT-RIC and the E2 node uses dual connectivity for communication); sending the event trigger from the E2 node to a near-real time (near-RT) RIC (paragraph 91 and Fig. 4, step 405, the E2 node sends cell load KPI and status of the cells); and sending, by the near-RT RIC, a control message to the E2 node to implement the optimal handover of the UE to the optimal target cell for the UE (Fig. 5, step 511 and paragraph 93, the near-RT RIC sends RIC control request to the E2 node). Consider claim 2, Wang also teaches providing, by the E2 node of the O-RAN system, at least one of performance measurement data, trace data, and configuration management data to a non-real time (non-RT) RIC (Fig. 8, step 305 and paragraph 129-131); and sending, by the non-RT RIC to the E2 node of the O-RAN system, a cell shutdown message containing information regarding the first serving cell to be shut down (Fig. 8, step 304 and paragraph 129-131). Consider claim 3, Wang also teaches the E2 node comprises at least an O-RAN centralized unit control plane (O-CU-CP), and the E2 node sends the event trigger to the near-RT RIC in response to the cell shutdown message sent by the non-RT RIC (paragraph 30 and 64). Consider claims 7-8, Wang also teaches RIC Event Trigger Definition IE Style type 5 is used to detect a configuration process in the E2 node based on a specific configuration process type identifier and a configuration process breakpoint identifier associated with the configuration (paragraph 96 and Table 1 and paragraph 8-9, RIC style type 5 is dual connectivity where the RT-RIC and the E2 node uses dual connectivity for communication). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-6 and 9-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN YE LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-5258. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30-8:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kathy Wang-Hurst can be reached at 5712705371. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN Y LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2644 9/4/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 20, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750448
ANOMALY DETECTION IN TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS FOR IOT AND CONNECTED CARS USING SESSION, VOLUMETRIC, AND APN DATA ANALYSIS
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745288
COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739866
APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF COMMUNICATING A MILLIMETERWAVE (MMWAVE) PHYSICAL LAYER (PHY) PROTOCOL DATA UNIT (PPDU) OVER AN MMWAVE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION CHANNEL
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738995
TRANSMITTING METHOD, TRANSMITTING DEVICE, RECEIVING METHOD AND RECEIVING DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739913
HANDSHAKE FOR SMOOTH ROAMING
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+10.9%)
3y 2m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 715 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month