Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/894,401

WORKPIECE PROCESSING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 24, 2024
Priority
Oct 05, 2023 — JP 2023-173656
Examiner
ESKRIDGE, CORY W
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
DISCO Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
475 granted / 652 resolved
+4.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
683
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
§103
45.1%
+5.1% vs TC avg
§102
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
§112
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 652 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 – 2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ogawa et al. (CN 115954326A). Regarding claim 1, Ogawa teaches (FIG. 6A, 6B, 11A, 11B, 12A, 12B): A workpiece processing method for a workpiece having a first surface and a second surface on a back side of the first surface, the method comprising: forming a water-soluble protective film (33/37 resin film may be water-soluble) that covers the first surface of the workpiece (FIG. 11B); after forming the water-soluble protective film is performed, holding a first surface side of the workpiece with a holding table and exposing a second surface side (FIG. 11A); after holding the first surface side of the workpiece is performed, processing the workpiece from the second surface side of the workpiece (laser 130); and after processing the workpiece is performed, cleaning the first surface side of the workpiece to remove the water-soluble protective film (FIG. 7B protective layer is easily removed with water). Regarding claim 2, Ogawa teaches (FIG. 11A): The workpiece processing method according to claim 1, further comprising before or after forming the water-soluble protective film is performed, fixing the second surface side of the workpiece to a tape (31), wherein, processing the workpiece includes emitting a laser beam toward the second surface side of the workpiece through the tape (FIG. 11A). Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nakamura (US 2015/0357224). Regarding claim 1, Nakamura teaches (FIG. 6A – 11B): A workpiece processing method for a workpiece having a first surface and a second surface on a back side of the first surface, the method comprising: forming a water-soluble protective film (300) that covers the first surface of the workpiece; after forming the water-soluble protective film is performed, holding a first surface side of the workpiece with a holding table and exposing a second surface side (FIG. 6B); after holding the first surface side of the workpiece is performed, processing the workpiece from the second surface side of the workpiece (FIG. 6B); and after processing the workpiece is performed, cleaning the first surface side of the workpiece to remove the water-soluble protective film (FIG. 11A – 11B). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. JP 2011061097 teaches laser dicing of a wafer through a dicing tape US 2016/0172312 teaches processing the backside of a wafer after attaching a water-soluble protection layer, using a laser processing from the backside Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CORY W ESKRIDGE whose telephone number is (571)272-0543. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 9 - 5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julio Madonado can be reached at 571-272-1864. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CORY W ESKRIDGE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 24, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772442
DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY AND FORMING METHOD THEREFOR
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772915
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12755079
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE LAYOUT
4y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12757416
METAL-OXIDE-SEMICONDUCTOR CAPACITOR STRUCTURE
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12755790
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICES WITH DIELECTRIC FIN STRUCTURES
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+7.6%)
2y 8m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 652 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month