Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/895,326

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PARALLEL ANALOG IN-MEMORY COMPUTING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 24, 2024
Examiner
BERMUDEZ LOZADA, ALFREDO
Art Unit
2825
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Nanjing University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
461 granted / 518 resolved
+21.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
557
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
40.7%
+0.7% vs TC avg
§102
44.3%
+4.3% vs TC avg
§112
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 518 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is responsive to the following communications: the Application filed September 24, 2024. Claims 1-10 are pending. Claims 1 and 4 are independent. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55 received on November 4, 2024. Claim Objections Claim 4 is objected to because of the following informalities: claim 4 is construed as independent claim drafted in a short-hand format to avoid rewriting the elements recited in claim 1. For proper fee calculation, claim 4 should be canceled or redraft it as independent claim including all the limitations of claim 1. See Ex parte Porter, 25 U.S.P.Q.2d 1147 (Bd. of Pat. App. Inter. 1992). Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nagey (U.S. 2016/0133321). Regarding independent claim 1, Nagey discloses a method for parallel analog in-memory computing (see page 1, par. 0016), comprising the following steps: inputting an analog current signal (“Each data signal is represented as one of current values (currents, bit line currents, memory cell outputs) 263-266,” see page 4, par. 0046); replicating the analog current signal to form a corresponding replicated current signal (Fig. 2: Binarizer 270 comprises load transistors 217 and 278 to form a current copier…commonly known in the art as a current mirror, see page 3-4, par. 0045), and performing weighted processing of all replicated current signals to obtain a corresponding set of modulated current signals (“Currents I0, I1, I2 and I3 are binarized while flowing through binarizer 270 generating binary weighted currents..283-286,” see page 4, par. 0046); and performing weighted accumulated operation of a set of modulated current signals according to Kirchhoff’s current law to obtain an output current signal (see page 4, par. 0046). Regarding claim 2, Nagey discloses wherein the analog current signal is replicated through a current replication circuit to form the corresponding replicated current signal Fig. 2: Binarizer 270 comprises load transistors 217 and 278 to form a current copier…commonly known in the art as a current mirror, see page 3-4, par. 0045). Regarding claim 3, Nagey discloses wherein the weighted processing of all replicated current signals is detailed as follows: performing weight assignment through a switch module, wherein the switch module comprises a switching element; wherein when the switching element is in a low-resistance state, an output modulated current signal equals an input current signal, representing that the input current signal is assigned with a weight or “1”; and wherein when the switching element is in a high-resistance state, the output modulated current signal is far less than the input current signal, representing that the input current signal is assigned with a weight of “0” (Resistive memory elements are programmed in high and low resistance state respectively. In both cases a current flows through the resistive memory element. The current is inversely proportional to resistance, i.e. when the resistive memory element is in a low-resistance state, the current can be equal to the input current, and when the resistive memory element is in a high resistance state, the current will be lower, see also pages 2-3, par. 0040-0042). Regarding independent claim 4, Nagey discloses a device (Fig. 2) using the method for parallel analog in-memory computing according to claim 1, comprising: single-bit units, configured for replicating and weighted processing of analog current signals to obtain a set of modulated current signals (Fig. 2: 201 and 270, see pages 3-4, par. 0045), and weighted modules, configured for performing weighted accumulated operation of the set of modulated current signals according to Kirchhoff’s current law to obtain an output current signal (Fig. 2: 270 and 280, see page 4, par. 0046). Regarding claim 5, Nagey discloses wherein each of the single-bit units comprises a replication module (Fig. 2: 271-274) and a switch module (Fig. 2: 210, 225, 275-278); the replication module is configured for replicating the analog current signal and outputting the replicated current signal of a fixed size (Fig. 2: Binarizer 270 comprises load transistors 217 and 278 to form a current copier…commonly known in the art as a current mirror, see page 3-4, par. 0045); and the switch module is configured for performing the weighted processing of the replicated current signal (“Currents I0, I1, I2 and I3 are binarized while flowing through binarizer 270 generating binary weighted currents..283-286,” see page 4, par. 0046). Regarding claim 6, Nagey discloses wherein the replication module is a current mirror circuit that replicates the input current at a ratio of 1:1 or any other fixed ratio (see page 5, par. 0050). Regarding claim 7, Nagey discloses wherein the switch module comprises a memristor or a non-volatile memory, and the non-volatile memory is one or more of MRAM, PCM and FLASH (see page 3, par. 0044). Regarding claim 8, Nagey discloses wherein each of the weighted modules performs weighted summation of output modulated current signals from n switch modules respectively with 2i as weighted values, where n is an integer and I is an integer ranging from 0 to n-1, to obtain an output current signal with an n-bit precision (see page 1, par. 0010). Regarding claim 9, Nagey discloses wherein an electronic element of each of the weighted modules is one or more of the memristor, the MRAM, the PCM and the FLASH (see Abstract, “binarizer coupled to the memory array assigns binary weights,” see also page 3, par. 0044). Regarding claim 10, Nagey discloses wherein replication modules and switch modules included in the single-bit units form a crossbar array (see Fig. 2). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALFREDO BERMUDEZ LOZADA whose telephone number is (571)272-0877. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00AM-3:30PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexander G Sofocleous can be reached at 571-272-0635. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Alfredo Bermudez Lozada/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2825
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 24, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603119
HOT CARRIER INJECTION PROGRAMMING AND SECURITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603131
GATE-CONTROLLED THYRISTOR AND CAM ARRAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12586635
STATIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY WITH WRITE ASSIST CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580028
COMPACT DIGITAL THERMOMETER IN A MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573465
ERROR CORRECTION CODE CIRCUIT AND SEMICONDUCTOR APPARATUS INCLUDING THE ERROR CORRECTION CODE CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+1.6%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 518 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month