Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/896,550

Line Scan Imaging Device, and Calibration Method and Control Board Thereof

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 25, 2024
Priority
Jun 28, 2024 — CN 202410852197.5
Examiner
SPINKS, ANTOINETTE T
Art Unit
2639
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Diodes Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
669 granted / 928 resolved
+10.1% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
958
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
81.9%
+41.9% vs TC avg
§102
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
§112
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 928 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential steps, such omission amounting to a gap between the steps. See MPEP § 2172.01. The omitted steps are related to how the maximum pixel brightness value adjusted and used to determine the predetermined light intensity. Specifically, details regarding the following, from paragraph 41 of the originally filed specification, could clarify the independent claims: When the maximum pixel brightness value of the stitched first image is less than or equal to the first predetermined brightness value, the first light intensity at which the stitched first image is obtained is used as the predetermined light intensity of the light source 102. The light source 104 is set with the predetermined light intensity, and the line scan imaging device 104 is operated to obtain the second images (captured by the line scan camera modules 110-130). Otherwise, when the maximum pixel brightness value of the stitched first image is greater than the first predetermined brightness value, the light source 102 may be set to have another light intensity, e.g., a second light intensity (different from the first light intensity), at which, the line scan imaging device 104 may be configured to obtain another stitched first image. The maximum pixel brightness value of the another stitched first image is then determined and compared with the first predetermined brightness value to determine whether the second light intensity may be used as the redetermined light intensity of the light source 102. Claims 1, 11 and 15 include the limitation “generating calibration information”. It is not clear, from the claim language, what is being calibrated and to what the calibration information relates. Is the calibration for the line scan camera? Is the calibration for the light source? Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 – 20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Contact Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTOINETTE SPINKS whose telephone number is (571)270-3749. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7am - 5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Twyler Haskins can be reached at 571-272-7406. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTOINETTE T SPINKS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2639
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 25, 2024
Application Filed
May 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684233
ACCESSORY APPARATUS, IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12663608
LENS BARREL AND CONTROL APPARATUS
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666131
IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666141
PHOTODETECTION APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656717
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+20.1%)
2y 9m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 928 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month