Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/900,974

ENERGY RECOVERY CONTROL METHOD FOR VEHICLE, SYSTEM AND VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102§112§Other
Filed
Sep 30, 2024
Examiner
LAGUARDA, GONZALO
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Anhui DeepWay Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
503 granted / 694 resolved
+2.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
755
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§103
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
§102
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 694 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 11 requires a vehicle and is dependent from claim 6 which already requires a vehicle. This is either not further limiting or requiring two vehicles but with the same limitation name which is indefinite. For the purpose of examination this will be construed as being the same vehicle. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Zhang (U.S. Pat. No. 12,157,399). Regarding claim 1, Zhang discloses an energy recovery control method for a vehicle (title), comprising: obtaining a current gear of the vehicle when an accelerator pedal of the vehicle is not pressed (col. 7, lines 37-42); determining coasting energy recovery torque based on the gear (col. 7, line 65 – col. 8, line 15), wherein the coasting energy recovery torque is smaller at a low gear than at a high gear (this is a statement of how the energy recovery works not an added limitation); obtaining a brake pedal opening degree of the vehicle (col. 7, lines 37-42 “brake pedal”), and obtaining braking energy recovery torque according to the brake pedal opening degree and the gear, wherein given a same brake pedal opening degree, the braking energy recovery torque is greater at a low gear than at a high gear; and controlling the vehicle to perform energy recovery according to the coasting energy recovery torque and the braking energy recovery torque (s103 disclosed in col. 8 ,lines 15-20). Regarding claim 2, 7, 13 and 18 which depends from claim 1, 6, 12 and 17 respectively, Zhang discloses wherein said obtaining the brake pedal opening degree of the vehicle and obtaining the braking energy recovery torque according to the brake pedal opening degree and the gear comprises: determining whether the brake pedal is pressed; obtaining the braking energy recovery torque as zero when the brake pedal is not pressed (col. 9, lines 10-14 discloses without brake pedal depression there is no braking energy mode as per fig. 4); and obtaining the brake pedal opening degree when the brake pedal is pressed, and obtaining the braking energy recovery torque according to the brake pedal opening degree and the gear, wherein the braking energy recovery torque is proportional to the brake pedal opening degree, and the braking energy recovery torque is dependent on the gear (col. 8, lines 44-47 discloses the two modes are combined). Regarding claim 3, 8, 14 and 19 which depends from claim 1, 6, 12 and 17 respectively, Zhang discloses wherein said controlling the vehicle to perform the energy recovery according to the coasting energy recovery torque and the braking energy recovery torque comprises: obtaining energy recovery torque according to the coasting energy recovery torque and the braking energy recovery torque, wherein the energy recovery torque is a sum of the coasting energy recovery torque and the braking energy recovery torque; and controlling the vehicle to perform the energy recovery according to the braking energy recovery torque (col. 9, lines 10-14 discloses braking energy recovery is performed when braking is requested with col. 8 discussing how both are calculated). Regarding claim 4, 9, 15 and 20 which depends from claim 3, 8, 14 and 19 respectively, Zhang discloses wherein said controlling the vehicle to perform the energy recovery according to the braking energy recovery torque comprises: controlling, when the brake pedal is not pressed, the vehicle to perform coasting energy recovery according to the braking energy recovery torque (col. 9, lines 10-12); or controlling, when the brake pedal is pressed, the vehicle to perform braking energy recovery while performing coasting energy recovery according to the braking energy recovery torque (col. 9, lines 12-14). Regarding claim 5, 10 and 16 which depends from claim 1, 6 and 12 respectively, Zhang discloses further comprising, prior to determining the coasting energy recovery torque based on the gear: determining whether a coasting energy recovery mode is enabled (col. 9, lines 10-14 determines which mode will be performed); performing, when the coasting energy recovery mode is enabled, the step of determining the coasting energy recovery torque based on the gear; obtaining, when the coasting energy recovery mode is not enabled and when the brake pedal is pressed, the braking energy recovery torque based on the brake pedal opening degree and the gear (col. 9, lines 15-21), and controlling the vehicle to perform braking energy recovery according to the braking energy recovery torque. Regarding claim 6 and 12, Zhang discloses an energy recovery control system for a vehicle, comprising: a memory having a program instruction stored thereon; and a processor configured to, when executing the program instruction (col. 17, lines 19-28 discloses the computer), perform operations of: obtaining a current gear of the vehicle when an accelerator pedal of the vehicle is not pressed; determining coasting energy recovery torque based on the gear, wherein the coasting energy recovery torque is smaller at a low gear than at a high gear; obtaining a brake pedal opening degree of the vehicle, and obtaining braking energy recovery torque according to the brake pedal opening degree and the gear, wherein given a same brake pedal opening degree, the braking energy recovery torque is greater at a low gear than at a high gear; and controlling the vehicle to perform energy recovery according to the coasting energy recovery torque and the braking energy recovery torque (addressed in claim 1 above). Regarding claim 11 which depends from claim 6, Zhang discloses a vehicle, comprising: the energy recovery control system for the vehicle according to claim 6 (Title). Regarding claim 17 which depends from claim 1, Zhang discloses a computer program product, having a computer program stored thereon, the program, when executed by a processor, implements the energy recovery control method for the vehicle according to claim 1 (col. 17, lines 19-28 discloses the computer). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GONZALO LAGUARDA whose telephone number is (571)272-5920. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5 M-Th Alt. F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Logan Kraft can be reached at (571) 270-5065. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GONZALO LAGUARDA Primary Examiner Art Unit 3747 email: gonzalo.laguarda@uspto.gov /GONZALO LAGUARDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594921
ELECTROMECHANICAL BRAKE PRESSURE GENERATOR INCLUDING AN ANTI-TWIST PROTECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589738
VEHICLE-TRAVELING CONTROL SYSTEM AND VEHICLE-TRAVELING CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583518
METHOD FOR OPERATING A PARKING ASSISTANCE SYSTEM, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT, PARKING ASSISTANCE SYSTEM AND VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12565191
VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE AND VEHICLE CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12559116
VEHICLE FOR PREGNANT WOMAN AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+7.0%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 694 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month