Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/904,830

INFLATABLE SURFING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 02, 2024
Priority
Nov 13, 2015 — provisional 62/255,054 +4 more
Examiner
PETERS, BRIAN O
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Whitewater West Industries, Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
467 granted / 641 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
671
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
47.6%
+7.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
28.3%
-11.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 641 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to for beginning with “The” rather than “A”. Additionally the phrase “of the present invention” should be removed from the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 is unclear in that it recites “a second portion (102) … positioned over the first portion.” It is unclear what “over” means. Claim 3 is unclear in that it recites the relative term “near”. Claims 3-18 are unclear for their dependency from claim 2. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Murphy US 20150057093. Regarding claim 1, Murphy discloses a water attraction a ride surface (602), the ride surface shaped in at least a half circle when viewed from above (Fig. 6); a water delivery section (604); and a recovery section (610), Regarding claim 2, Murphy further discloses ([0047]) that the ride surface comprises a first portion (101) and a second portion (102) separate from and positioned over the first portion. Regarding claim 3, Murphy further discloses that the first portion has a thinner profile at a first section disposed near the water delivery section (Fig. 1A). Regarding claim 4, Murphy further discloses that the first portion has a raised profile at a second section that defines an upward taper across the ride surface extending away from the water delivery section (Fig. 1A). Regarding claim 5, Murphy further discloses that the first portion has a more raised profile at a third section that defines a second upward taper across the ride surface extending away from the water delivery section (Fig. 1A). Regarding claim 6, Murphy further discloses that the second upward taper is less than the upward taper such that the more raised profile of the third section is less steep than the raised profile of the second section (Fig. 1A). Regarding claim 7, Murphy further discloses that the second portion is inflatable (Title). Regarding claim 8, Murphy further discloses that a connecting element (105) to couple the ride surface to the water delivery section. Regarding claim 9, Murphy further discloses that the first portion is comprised of a plurality of segments positioned connected along their sides to define the half circle shape (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 10, Murphy further discloses that the second portion defines one thickness along its length (Fig. 1A). Regarding claim 11, Murphy further discloses that the first portion creates an elevation change and defining profile of the ride surface and the second portion positioned upon the first portion conforms to a shape of the defining profile (Fig. 1A). Regarding claim 12, Murphy further discloses a bar (142) positioned along a perimeter of the ride surface to hold a desired position of the ride surface. Regarding claim 13, Murphy further discloses that the bar defines a partial circle (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 14, Murphy further discloses that the water delivery section comprises a plurality of water delivery elements ([0048]). Regarding claim 15, Murphy further discloses that one or more of the plurality of water delivery elements deliver a water flow different from that from other one or more of the plurality of water delivery elements (each nozzle has its own flow). Regarding claim 16, Murphy further discloses that the plurality of water delivery elements are configured to spread water horizontally on the ride surface in a fanned-out orientation (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 17, Murphy further discloses that one or more of the plurality of water delivery elements are configured to match the ride surface and wherein the fanned-out orientation is configured to reduce overlap among flows from the one or more of the plurality of water delivery elements (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 18, Murphy further discloses a substantially smooth water surface on the ride surface (Fig. 1A). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Alleshouse US 9592433 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN O PETERS whose telephone number is (571)272-2662. The examiner can normally be reached Tue-Sat, 12:00pm-10pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eugene Kim can be reached at (571) 272-4463. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN O PETERS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §102, §112
Aug 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746448
MODULAR PUTTING GREEN
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12736061
MULTIPLE BLADE ROWS FOR IMPELLER AND DIFFUSER STAGES
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12721284
Hauling Device Having Collapsible Handle
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722071
AUTOMATIC CARD DEALING SYSTEM FOR USE WITH GAMING TABLE
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12715552
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION IN POWERED WATERCRAFT
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+16.1%)
2y 10m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 641 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month