Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Whitewater West Industries, Ltd.

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 11 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
25% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ELLIOTT, ANDREW JAMES 1 0.0% +0.0%
DENNIS, MICHAEL DAVID 1 55.4% +30.6%
KLOTZ, WILLIAM R 1 39.1% +55.3%
MONTOYA, OSCHTA I 1 71.2% +14.4%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18745898 MODULAR PLAY CENTER ELLIOTT, ANDREW JAMES
18602505 INTERACTIVE AMUSEMENT ATTRACTION SYSTEM AND METHOD DENNIS, MICHAEL DAVID
18057150 Pool Wave Generator KLOTZ, WILLIAM R

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18250198 Amusement Attraction with Coupled Ride Paths MONTOYA, OSCHTA I 22d overdue
18602505 INTERACTIVE AMUSEMENT ATTRACTION SYSTEM AND METHOD DENNIS, MICHAEL DAVID
18057150 Pool Wave Generator KLOTZ, WILLIAM R

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3711 2
3754 1
2421 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18745898 MODULAR PLAY CENTER ELLIOTT, ANDREW JAMES 3711 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jun 17, 2024
18602505 INTERACTIVE AMUSEMENT ATTRACTION SYSTEM AND METHOD DENNIS, MICHAEL DAVID 3711 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 12, 2024
18057150 Pool Wave Generator KLOTZ, WILLIAM R 3754 §102§103 Final Rejection Pending Aug 16, 2023
18250198 Amusement Attraction with Coupled Ride Paths MONTOYA, OSCHTA I 2421 §103 Non-Final OA 22d overdue Pending Apr 21, 2023

Managing Whitewater West Industries, Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month