Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/908,211

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 07, 2024
Priority
Aug 26, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0107981 +3 more
Examiner
LEA EDMONDS, LISA S
Art Unit
2847
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
671 granted / 772 resolved
+18.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
775
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§102
52.9%
+12.9% vs TC avg
§112
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 772 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 08/06/2026 has been entered. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 08/06/2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. The information disclosure statement filed on 08/06/2026 includes foreign patent documents but fails to provide the copies thereof has not been considered as to the merits. Applicant is advised that the date of any re-submission of any item of information contained in this information disclosure statement or the submission of any missing element(s) will be the date of submission for purposes of determining compliance with the requirements based on the time of filing the statement, including all certification requirements for statements under 37 CFR 1.97(e). See MPEP § 609.05(a). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1, includes two (2) periods rendering the independent claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the first period (see the end of line 9 after bodies) are part of the claimed invention. Claims 2-20 are dependent form claim 1 and therefore carry the same indefinite issue as claim 1. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 21 is allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: as to claim 21, patentability resides, at least in part, in the interconnection and interrelationship between the electronic device, the display module, the display panel, the folding set, the first body, the second body, the hinge module, and the biaxial rotation axis is disposed above and spaced apart from axes are disposed at a level higher than, and spaced apart from, gear rotation axes of all of the plurality of gears as claimed and including all of the other limitations. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LISA LEA-EDMONDS whose telephone number is (571)272-2043. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Thompson can be reached at 571-272-2342. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LISA LEA-EDMONDS Primary Examiner Art Unit 2847 /LISA LEA-EDMONDS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2847 2026-08-10
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 07, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 01, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 10, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 06, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748466
FOLDING MECHANISM AND FOLDABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743135
DISPLAY DEVICE AND WINDOW MODULE
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12730483
ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING FLEXIBLE DISPLAY HAVING EXPANDABLE DISPLAY AREA
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730474
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724465
Computing Device
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+4.9%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 772 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month