Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 30, 2026
Application No. 18/911,155

POSITIONING ANCHOR SELECTION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 09, 2024
Priority
Feb 24, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTEP2022054692 +1 more
Examiner
SABOURI, MAZDA
Art Unit
2641
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Nokia Corporation
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
493 granted / 638 resolved
+15.3% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
669
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
§103
60.1%
+20.1% vs TC avg
§102
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 638 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 3/13/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) filed on 3/13/2026 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1, 3-8, 10-15, 17-20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. In carefully reviewing Applicant’s original Specification, examiner was unable to find support for the subject matter recited in amended claims 1, 8 and 15. Paragraph 35 briefly mentions the existence of an LMF as part of a wireless communication system. Paragraph 62 teaches that an LMF can select anchor positioning anchors. However, examiner was unable to find support linking any of the methods as recited in figures 5-9 to an embodiment in which the LMF, or any other network element besides a UE, selects anchor UEs in the manner recited in claims 1, 8 and 15. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAZDA SABOURI whose telephone number is (571)272-8892. The examiner can normally be reached 10 am-7 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles Appiah can be reached at 571-272-7904. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAZDA SABOURI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 10 earlier events
Nov 03, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 30, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 13, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 13, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 21, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12713243
SYSTEM FOR DETECTING ACTIVITY RELATED TO DECOMMISSIONED NETWORK DEVICES
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12707008
TELEPHONE NUMBER VERIFICATION FOR USE WITH CALLER IDENTIFICATION SERVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12671723
SYSTEM FOR CONFIGURING REMITTANCES FOR USER-SOURCED CRIME INFORMATION
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12659735
SUPPORTING REMOTE UNIT REAUTHENTICATION
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659845
CELL SELECTION FOR USER EQUIPMENT REGISTRATION
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+16.8%)
3y 1m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 638 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month