Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/911,897

KEY PROVISION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 10, 2024
Examiner
WILLIAMS, JEFFERY L
Art Unit
2495
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Nokia Technologies Oy
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
341 granted / 498 resolved
+10.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
525
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
§103
34.6%
-5.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.6%
-16.4% vs TC avg
§112
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 498 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 1 – 16 are pending. Claims 4 – 16 are withdrawn from further consideration. Any references to applicant’s specification are made by way of applicant’s U.S. pre-grant printed patent publication. This action is in response to the communication filed on 3/19/26. All objections and rejections not set forth below have been withdrawn. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 3/19/26 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 – 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Jin et al. (Jin), US 2024/0340751 A1. Regarding claim 1, Jin discloses: An apparatus comprising: at least one processor; and at least one memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to perform (e.g. Jin, fig. 13; claim 9) obtaining at least one secondary node counter list (e.g. Jin, Abstract – sk-counter list; fig. 6:620; fig. 7:720, 730; par. 13, 162, 175, 176, 238 – at least one or more SN configurations, each including a sk-counter list, corresponding to one or more secondary nodes, e.g. 604, 605 and/or 703, 704, 705), wherein each of the at least one secondary node counter list is specific to a respective secondary node (e.g. Jin, par. 13, 15, 161, 162, 231 – 236, 238; fig. 6 – a plurality of secondary nodes 603, 604, 605) of a plurality of secondary nodes (e.g. Jin, fig. 6 – a plurality of secondary nodes 603, 604, 605), and comprises a plurality of secondary node counter values for successive accesses to the respective secondary node (e.g. Jin, par. 14, 15, 155, 156, 219, 238), obtaining an indication of a secondary node of the plurality of secondary nodes (e.g. Jin, par. 162, 164, 193 – terminal receives a CPC related condition for a specific SN). generating a secondary node key at least partially based on the at least one obtained secondary node counter list and the indication of the secondary node (e.g. Jin, Abstract; par. 162, 165, 219, 220, 222, 224, 234, 235, 238; fig. 9 – the security key for access to the SN is generated based upon the specific SN’s configuration data, comprising the counter list, and the indication of which SN configuration data to be applied for the identified SN), and accessing the secondary node using the generated secondary node key (e.g. Jin, Abstract; par. 238; fig. 9). Regarding claim 2, Jin discloses: wherein the apparatus is further caused to perform: counting a number of accesses of the apparatus to a respective secondary node, wherein generating the secondary key is further based on the counted number of accesses (e.g. Jin, par. 224, 238, 243, 244). Regarding claim 3, Jin discloses: wherein at least one of each of the at least one secondary node counter list comprises a non-monotonic sequence of secondary node counter values (e.g. Jin, par. 246, 247, 253 – alternatively to an increasing sequence, the counter values are random or sequenced according to a predetermined rule), or each of the at least one secondary node counter list mutually differ from one another (e.g. Jin, par. 237, 238, 256, 264, 265). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1 - 3 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEFFERY L WILLIAMS whose telephone number is (571)272-7965. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30 am - 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Farid Homayounmehr can be reached on 571-272-3739. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEFFERY L WILLIAMS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2495
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 10, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
May 27, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Jul 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 02, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Dec 10, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 27, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Feb 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 19, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592824
SECURE APPARATUS TO SHARE AND DEPLOY MACHINE BUILD PROGRAMS UTILIZING UNIQUE HASH TOKENS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591689
ANALYZING RISK FOR DEVICES WITHIN A MANAGED ENVIRONMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580774
DIGITAL SIGNATURES OF MESSAGES USING SIGNATURE SHARES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572630
USER-TRUSTED EXECUTABLE EXECUTION ENVIRONMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574258
PUBLICLY VERIFIABLE ENCRYPTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+19.0%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 498 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month