Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/912,137

METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR DRX CYCLE CONFIGURATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 10, 2024
Priority
Oct 13, 2023 — EU 23203400.9
Examiner
FUQUA, CHRISTINE DUONG
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Nokia Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
560 granted / 676 resolved
+22.8% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
703
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
§103
60.7%
+20.7% vs TC avg
§102
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
§112
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 676 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This is in response to the Applicant's arguments and amendments filed on 10 October 2024 in which claims 1-14 are currently pending and claim 15 has been cancelled. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The references listed in the Information Disclosure Statement, filed on 19 November 2024, have been considered by the examiner (see attached PTO-1449 form or PTO/SB/08A and 08B forms). Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because it is suggested to remove the words “(FIG. 9)” at the end of the abstract. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Objections Claims 8, 9 are objected to because of the following informalities: Regarding claim 8, it is unclear what is meant by the claimed limitation “the power consumption indication is or is converted” in line 2. Regarding claim 9, it is unclear what is meant by the claimed limitation “the QoS indication is or is converted” in line 2. For the examination on the merits, the claims will be interpreted as best understood. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 6-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vannithamby et al. (PG Pub US 2023/0199669 A1) in view of Zheng et al. (PG Pub US 2025/0267754 A1). Regarding claims 1, 12, Vannithamby discloses a method and an apparatus. memory storing computer readable instructions; and processing circuitry configured to execute the computer readable instructions to cause the apparatus to (memory 402, processor 401, fig. 4): perform a Reinforcement Learning, RL, process (“reinforcement learning model” [0098]) to configure at least one Discontinuous Reception, DRX, cycle for a User Equipment, UE (“the BS 351 may configure the radio resources according to the preference of the terminal device. The BS 351 may adjust the DRX parameters” [0061], “The AI/ML 1402 may be trained to provide an output indicating a DRX parameter for the respective UE” [0123]); performing the RL process comprises: select, by the RL agent, an action in an action space, each action in the action space corresponds to a DRX cycle configuration defined by a set of at least one DRX cycle configuration parameter, wherein each set of at least one DRX cycle configuration parameter corresponding to an action in the action space includes a DRX cycle active period duration (“The MDP may determine an action from an action set based on a previous observation which may be referred to as a state” [0098], “The AI/ML 1402 may be trained to provide an output indicating a DRX parameter for the respective UE .. one of a DRX Cycle, a duration of ON time within one DRX Cycle, a DRX inactivity timer, a DRX retransmission timer, a short DRX Cycle, a DRX short cycle timer” [0123]); send to the UE indication to use the DRX cycle configuration corresponding to the selected action (“The AI/ML 1402 may be trained to provide an output indicating a DRX parameter for the respective UE” [0123], “The BS 351 may adjust the DRX parameters” [0061]); receive, by the RL agent from the UE, state information computed over at least one DRX cycle, each of the at least one DRX cycle being configured based on a DRX cycle configuration indicated by the RL agent, the state information including at least one of a power consumption indication and a Quality of Service, QoS, indication (“The device data may include information with respect to the DRX support of the UE .. or user's preference with respect to power-saving or QoS” [0083], “The UE 2301 may measure the received downlink radio communication signals from the BS (e.g. SSBs or CSI-RSs) to obtain one or more measurement results. Furthermore, the UE 2301 may obtain the context information is provided in this disclosure. The processor of the UE 2301 may provide the input including the one or more measurement results” [0181]); compute, by the RL agent, a reward based on the state information (“In a next state, the MDP may determine a reward based on the next state and the previous state” [0098]); update a policy for selecting an action in the action space based on the reward (“the RL agent 1001 may obtain the capability to map the states that the communication activity data 1002 indicates to the actions with a goal to maximize the QoS and/or QoE while preserving maximum power, or while sending as maximum number of PPIs indicating the low power mode, or while maximizing the duration of the low power mode for the device” [0108]). However, Vannithamby does not explicitly disclose includes a DRX cycle active period duration. Nevertheless, Zheng discloses “dynamically adjusting UE DRX configurations may include DRX predication in AI-based DRX configuration, AI-based short/long DRX cycle switching, AI-based drx-Inactivity Timer prediction, and switching between AI-DRX and legacy DRX mode (e.g., without AI)” [0122], “This DRX configuration may be signaled, such as via RRC signaling 1006, to the UE 1008 when the UE 1008 is in an active time (e.g., DRX on duration)” [0125]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include a DRX cycle active period duration because “The AI-based DRX configuration can dynamically adjust UE DRX configurations based on a prediction generated by an AI system” [0045]. Regarding claim 13, Vannithamby discloses a method. receiving, by a User Equipment from a Reinforcement Learning, RL, agent, indication to use a Discontinuous Reception, DRX, cycle configuration (“The AI/ML 1402 may be trained to provide an output indicating a DRX parameter for the respective UE” [0123], “The BS 351 may adjust the DRX parameters” [0061]), the DRX cycle configuration is defined by a set of at least one DRX cycle configuration parameter (“The AI/ML 1402 may be trained to provide an output indicating a DRX parameter for the respective UE .. one of a DRX Cycle, a duration of ON time within one DRX Cycle, a DRX inactivity timer, a DRX retransmission timer, a short DRX Cycle, a DRX short cycle timer” [0123], “the AI/ML may be configured to provide the output based on the set of machine model parameters and the group set of machine model parameters for each one or more UEs” [0118]); configuring at least one DRX cycle based on the set of at least one DRX cycle configuration parameter, wherein the set of at least one DRX cycle configuration parameter includes a DRX cycle active period duration (“DRX parameters provide indications to the UE with respect to when the UE may operate in ON time or OFF time to receive radio communication signals from the BS” [0074]); sending, by the UE to the RL agent, state information computed over at least one DRX cycle, each of the at least one DRX cycle is configured based on a DRX cycle configuration indicated by the RL agent, the state information including at least one of a power consumption indication and a QoS indication (“The device data may include information with respect to the DRX support of the UE .. or user's preference with respect to power-saving or QoS” [0083]). However, Vannithamby does not explicitly disclose includes a DRX cycle active period duration. Nevertheless, Zheng discloses “dynamically adjusting UE DRX configurations may include DRX predication in AI-based DRX configuration, AI-based short/long DRX cycle switching, AI-based drx-Inactivity Timer prediction, and switching between AI-DRX and legacy DRX mode (e.g., without AI)” [0122], “This DRX configuration may be signaled, such as via RRC signaling 1006, to the UE 1008 when the UE 1008 is in an active time (e.g., DRX on duration)” [0125]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include a DRX cycle active period duration because “The AI-based DRX configuration can dynamically adjust UE DRX configurations based on a prediction generated by an AI system” [0045]. Regarding claims 2, 14, Vannithamby, Zheng discloses everything claimed as applied above. Further, Zheng discloses at least one set of at least one DRX cycle configuration parameter corresponding to an action in the action space includes at least one of a start offset for the DRX cycle active period and a DRX cycle length (“new drxStartOffset” [0128], “length of a DRX cycle” [0151]). Regarding claim 3, Vannithamby, Zheng discloses everything claimed as applied above. In addition, Vannithamby discloses the power consumption indication represents a power consumption level determined over the at least one DRX cycle (“The battery information may further include one or more constraints with respect to the battery of the UE. The constraints may include the capacity of the battery of the UE, or an estimated time for the battery to run out according to past operations and the remaining electrical supply power of the battery” [0081], “at least one of a DRX Cycle” [0123]). Regarding claim 4, Vannithamby, Zheng discloses everything claimed as applied above. Further, Zheng discloses the QoS indication is computed based on Extended Reality, XR, frames received over the at least one DRX cycle (“an extended reality (XR) device” [0049], “predict whether and when switch between the short and long DRX cycles” [0131]). Regarding claim 6, Vannithamby, Zheng discloses everything claimed as applied above. In addition, Vannithamby discloses the reward is computed as a function of at least one of a QoS satisfaction based on the QoS indication and a power consumption penalty based on the power consumption indication (“the RL agent 1001 may determine a reward based on the determined action in the first instance time and a second state that the communication activity data 1002 represents at a second instance time. The RL agent 1001 may receive the reward based on at least one of an impact of QoS or QoE based latencies” [0108]). Regarding claim 7, Vannithamby, Zheng discloses everything claimed as applied above. In addition, Vannithamby discloses the reward is computed as a weighted sum of rewards computed respectively for different types of frames received by the UE (“the new Q value of the corresponding state-action pair t is based on the old Q value for the state-action pair t and the sum of the reward r obtained by taking action at in the state st with a discount rate γ that is between 0 and 1, in which the weight between the old Q value and the reward portion is determined by the learning rate a” [0180]). Further, Zheng discloses XR frames (“an extended reality (XR) device” [0049]). Regarding claim 8, Vannithamby, Zheng discloses everything claimed as applied above. In addition, Vannithamby discloses the power consumption indication is or is converted to a power consumption level coded on n bits, where n is equal or greater than 1, the method comprising determining a state in a state space based on the power consumption level (“The battery information may further include one or more constraints with respect to the battery of the UE” [0081], “perform the AI/ML algorithm based on the battery level of the device, such as when the battery level is above a predefined threshold. Furthermore, the controller 603 may provide instructions to the AI/ML module 602 to operate in a low power mode in which the AI/ML module 602 does not perform the AI/ML algorithm when the device is being charged” [0092]). Regarding claim 9, Vannithamby, Zheng discloses everything claimed as applied above. In addition, Vannithamby discloses the QoS indication is or is converted to a QoS level coded on n bits, where n is equal or greater than 1, the method comprising determining a state in a state space based on the QoS level (“the training agent may obtain the training data based on communication activities performed in various conditions, such as various distances to the BS, various application conditions and QoS requirements” [0100], “the communication activity data 1201 may include .. their QoS requirements” [0110]). Regarding claim 10, Vannithamby, Zheng discloses everything claimed as applied above. In addition, Vannithamby discloses performing signalling with the UE to agree on at least one of a state space for the state information and an action space (“In a next state, the MDP may determine a reward based on the next state and the previous state. The determined action may influence the probability of the MDP to move into the next state. Accordingly, the MDP may obtain a function that maps the current state to an action to be determined with the purpose of maximizing the rewards” [0169], “the BS 351 may configure the radio resources according to the preference of the terminal device. The BS 351 may adjust the DRX parameters” [0061]). Regarding claim 11, Vannithamby, Zheng discloses everything claimed as applied above. In addition, Vannithamby discloses performing signalling with the UE to agree on at least one threshold to be used for computing the power consumption level or respectively the QoS level (“perform the AI/ML algorithm based on the battery level of the device, such as when the battery level is above a predefined threshold” [0159], “the BS 351 may configure the radio resources according to the preference of the terminal device. The BS 351 may adjust the DRX parameters” [0061]). Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vannithamby, Zheng further in view of Chen et al. (PG Pub US 2025/0227506 A1). Regarding claim 5, Vannithamby, Zheng discloses everything claimed as applied above. However, Vannithamby, Zheng does not explicitly disclose the QoS indication is computed based on a ratio of a number of Packet Data Units received within a packet delay budget. Nevertheless, Chen discloses “a ratio of a data amount of the data to a remaining delay budget of the data” [0032]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the QoS indication be computed based on a ratio of a number of Packet Data Units received within a packet delay budget because “the network device can schedule, based on the required rate of the data, the resource for transmission of the data, to reduce a data transmission delay and improve communication performance” [0033]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTINE D FUQUA whose telephone number is (571)270-1664. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8 AM - 6 PM EST with every other Friday off. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yemane Mesfin can be reached at (571)272-3927. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CHRISTINE DUONG FUQUA Primary Examiner Art Unit 2462 /CHRISTINE T DUONG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2462 09/04/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 10, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750894
NETWORK CONNECTION EXCEPTION PROCESSING METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750294
Detection Packet Transmission Method, Apparatus, and System
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12719782
ON DEMAND ROUTING MESH FOR ROUTING PACKETS THROUGH SD-WAN EDGE FORWARDING NODES IN AN SD-WAN
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12713277
APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING EDGE NETWORK AND SYSTEM SUPPPORT AND MANAGEMENT
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12696191
SIGNALING OPTIMIZATIONS FOR WIRELESS DEVICES OPERATING ON HARVESTED ENERGY
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.1%)
2y 11m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 676 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month