DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claims 1-6, 11, 13, and 29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Karasawa et al (US PG Pub # 2015/0288354). The Karasawa reference discloses a semiconductor die (para. # 0032), comprising:
a sensor pad (43);
first sensor circuitry (32) electrically connected to the sensor pad (Fig. 2); and
isolation circuitry (312) coupled between the first sensor circuitry and the sensor pad (para. # 0034 & 0038; pad 43 is selectively used as output of sensor 32).
With respect to claims 2-4, the isolation circuitry (312) connects and disconnects the temperature sensor circuit (Para. # 0038).
With respect to claims 5 & 6, see Figure 2.
With respect to claims 11, 13, & 29, see paragraphs # 0037-0040.
Claim 29 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Van Brunt et al (US PG Pub # 2022/0140138). Van Brunt discloses a semiconductor die (Fig. 1; para. # 004), comprising:
a first MOSFET (Msense) having a first source pad (20);
a second MOSFET (MD) having a second source pad (16); and
a temperature sensor (Rsense) electrically coupled to the second source pad (Fig. 2A).
Conclusion
Claims 7 and 9-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. There is no mention of a “power transistor device” on the semiconductor die of Karasawa. Claims 14-23 are allowable over the art of record for the same reasons.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RANDY W GIBSON whose telephone number is (571)272-2103. The examiner can normally be reached Tue-Friday 10AM-6PM.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Macchiarolo can be reached at 571-272-2375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
RANDY W. GIBSON
Primary Examiner
Art Unit 2856
/RANDY W GIBSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Prosecution Insights