Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/916,361

LIGHT EMITTING ELEMENT, DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Oct 15, 2024
Priority
Nov 23, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0164677
Examiner
QUARTERMAN, KEVIN J
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
730 granted / 882 resolved
+14.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
901
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
38.4%
-1.6% vs TC avg
§102
46.3%
+6.3% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 882 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I, claims 1-11, in the reply filed on 01 July 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 12-26 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 01 July 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The term “around” in claims 1-2 and 4 is a relative term which renders the claims indefinite. The term “around” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Independent claim 1, for example, recites “a first insulating layer around side surfaces of the first semiconductor layer…” in lines 8-9 of the claim. Using well-known definitions of the term around, it is unclear whether the first insulating layer is in the vicinity of the layer or surrounds the layers. For purposes of examination, the Examiner interprets the term around to mean “in the vicinity of”. Due to their dependencies upon independent claim 1, claims 2-11 are also deemed indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-9 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Moon (US 2023/0138336). Regarding independent claim 1, Moon teaches a light emitting element comprising a first semiconductor layer (Fig. 13E, Element 152d; ¶ [0173]); a second semiconductor layer (Fig. 13E, Element 152; ¶ [0108]) on the first semiconductor layer; a light emitting layer (Fig. 13E, 152b; ¶ [0108]) on the second semiconductor layer; a third semiconductor layer (Fig. 13E, Element 152c; ¶ [0108]) on the light emitting layer; an element electrode layer (Fig. 13E, Element 154T; ¶ [0175]) on the third semiconductor layer; a connection electrode (Fig. 13E, Element 154b; ¶ [0109]) on the element electrode layer; a first insulating layer (Fig. 13E, Element 156/302; ¶ [0107]) around side surfaces of the first semiconductor layer and the second semiconductor layer; a contact electrode (Fig. 13H, Element 290; ¶ [0150]) around a side surface of the first insulating layer and the side surface of the second semiconductor layer; and a second insulating layer (Fig. 13H, Element 303; ¶ [0153]) around the side surface of the second semiconductor layer, and side surfaces of the light emitting layer, the third semiconductor layer, the element electrode layer, and the connection electrode, wherein the contact electrode is in contact with the side surface of the second semiconductor layer (Fig. 13H). Regarding claim 2, Moon teaches the first insulating layer around an entirety of the side surface of the first semiconductor layer and a portion of the side surface of the second semiconductor layer (Fig. 13E). Regarding claim 3, Moon teaches the contact electrode not in contact with the first semiconductor layer (Fig. 13H). Regarding claim 4, Moon teaches the second insulating layer around a side surface of the contact electrode and not in contact with the first insulating layer (Fig. 13H). Regarding claim 5, Moon teaches a contact area in which the contact electrode and the second semiconductor layer are in contact with each other, wherein the contact area is located in an area ranging from 1 to 90% of a length of the second semiconductor layer from an interface between the first semiconductor layer and the second semiconductor layer (Fig. 13H; ¶ [0156]). Regarding claim 6, Moon teaches the contact area ranging from 1 to 90% of a total area of the side surface of the second semiconductor layer (Fig. 13H; ¶ [0156]). Regarding claim 7, Moon teaches the side surface of the first insulating layer, a side surface of the contact electrode, and a side surface of the second insulating layer aligned with each other (Fig. 13H). Regarding claim 8, Moon teaches the first insulating layer (Fig. 13H, Element 302; ¶ [0152]) not in contact with the second semiconductor layer (Fig. 13H). Regarding claim 9, Moon teaches the second insulating layer not in contact with a first side surface of the contact electrode and aligned with a second side surface of the contact electrode (Fig. 13H). Regarding claim 11, Moon teaches the first semiconductor layer comprising an undoped semiconductor (¶ [0173]), the second semiconductor layer comprises an N-type semiconductor (¶ [0108]), and the third semiconductor layer comprises a P-type semiconductor (¶ [0108]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Moon (US 2023/0138336) in view of Choi (US 2022/0352246). Regarding claim 10, Moon teaches the limitations of independent claim 1 discussed earlier but fails to exemplify a reflective layer around a side surface of the second insulating layer, wherein a side surface of the reflective layer is aligned with a side surface of the contact electrode. Choi teaches a light emitting element comprising a reflective layer (Fig. 5, Element RF1; ¶ [0106]) around a side surface of a second insulating layer (Fig. 5, Element INS1; ¶ [0106]), wherein a side surface of the reflective layer is aligned with a side surface of a contact electrode (Fig. 5, Element CME; ¶ [0106]). Choi discloses the reflective layer being provided for reflecting light beams from the light-emitting element upward, thereby preventing a mixture of light beams into adjacent light-emitting areas (¶s [0132]-[0133]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the reflective layer taught by Choi in the light-emitting element of Moon for preventing a mixture of light beams into adjacent light-emitting areas. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Jang (US 12,250,841) teaches a light emitting device package with a molding layer surrounding a light emitting source. Jang (US 2024/0088197) teaches an LED chip with multiple LED sub-units. Park (US 2023/0135600) teaches a light emitting element with an insulating layer surrounding the light emitting element. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kevin Quarterman whose telephone number is (571)272-2461. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Greece can be reached at (571) 272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kevin Quarterman/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875 16 September 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 15, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747841
CEILING LAMP MOUNTING STRUCTURE AND CEILING LAMP
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12733372
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING DISPLAY SUBSTRATE
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727330
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12713799
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12713776
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+11.5%)
2y 4m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 882 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month