Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/916,372

SYSTEM AND INTERFACES FOR MANAGING TEMPORARY WORKERS

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Oct 15, 2024
Priority
Feb 13, 2017 — provisional 62/458,528 +3 more
Examiner
OBAID, FATEH M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Scout Exchange LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
533 granted / 786 resolved
+7.8% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+35.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
808
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
32.6%
-7.4% vs TC avg
§103
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
§102
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 786 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This communication is responsive to the applicants filed on 04/29/2022. Claims 1-20 have been cancelled. Claims 21-40 are presented for examination. The examiner has considered references in applicant’s IDS form 1449 received on 03/21/2025, 11/13/2025 and 04/24/2026. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b). Claims 21-40 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 21-40 of copending Application No. 17/733,045, and claims 21-40 of copending Application No. 16/878,156, and claims 1-2 and 4-20 of copending Application No. 15/895,984. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims in each application are directed to staffing firm computer sub-systems for managing workers record with hiring process and performance data of candidates. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FATEH M OBAID whose telephone number is (571)270-7121. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8:00 A.M to 4:30 P.M. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ryan Zeender can be reached on (571) 272-6790. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FATEH M OBAID/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 15, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700046
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR NODE PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL DATA WITH MULTIMODE GRAPHICAL VIEWS
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12688483
COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A PRE-NOTE-ENABLED FILTERED TRANSACTIONS PROCESS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12688484
PRODUCT MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, PRODUCT MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12688245
GENERATIVE KNOWLEDGE SEARCH ENGINE FOR MULTI-QUERY ENABLED NETWORK KNOWLEDGE COMPLETION
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12670532
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MODELING DISTRIBUTED SERVICE SYSTEMS BY A LEDGER SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+35.5%)
3y 3m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 786 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month