Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 3 (75%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEBB III, JAMES L | 2 | 14.3% | +22.9% |
| LAKHANI, ANDREW C | 1 | 22.2% | +29.8% |
| OBAID, FATEH M | 1 | 67.8% | +35.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18741182 | TALENT PLATFORM EXCHANGE AND RECRUITER MATCHING SYSTEM | WEBB III, JAMES L | 3d overdue |
| 19324017 | CANDIDATE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR RECRUITING SYSTEMS | LAKHANI, ANDREW C | — |
| 18734542 | TALENT PLATFORM EXCHANGE AND RATING SYSTEM | WEBB III, JAMES L | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18741182 | TALENT PLATFORM EXCHANGE AND RECRUITER MATCHING SYSTEM | WEBB III, JAMES L | 3d overdue |
| 19324017 | CANDIDATE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR RECRUITING SYSTEMS | LAKHANI, ANDREW C | — |
| 18916372 | SYSTEM AND INTERFACES FOR MANAGING TEMPORARY WORKERS | OBAID, FATEH M | — |
| 18734542 | TALENT PLATFORM EXCHANGE AND RATING SYSTEM | WEBB III, JAMES L | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3624 | 2 |
| 3629 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19324017 | CANDIDATE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR RECRUITING SYSTEMS | LAKHANI, ANDREW C | 3629 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 09, 2025 |
| 18916372 | SYSTEM AND INTERFACES FOR MANAGING TEMPORARY WORKERS | OBAID, FATEH M | — | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 15, 2024 |
| 18741182 | TALENT PLATFORM EXCHANGE AND RECRUITER MATCHING SYSTEM | WEBB III, JAMES L | 3624 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 3d overdue | Pending | Jun 12, 2024 |
| 18734542 | TALENT PLATFORM EXCHANGE AND RATING SYSTEM | WEBB III, JAMES L | 3624 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 05, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial