Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 27, 2026
Application No. 18/916,928

MULTIPHASE TRANSINDUCTORS FOR ADVANCED VERTICAL POWER DELIVERY MODULES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 16, 2024
Priority
Dec 28, 2023 — provisional 63/615,552
Examiner
DINH, TUAN T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Omnion Power Technology GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
943 granted / 1197 resolved
+18.8% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1228
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§102
38.5%
-1.5% vs TC avg
§112
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1197 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Tittle The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: POWER DELIVELY MODULE AND WINDING SYSTEM. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a(1) as being anticipated by Konishi et al. (U.S. 2013/0301312). As to claim 1, Konishi discloses a power delivery module (1) as shown in figures 1-3, comprising: a first printed circuit board (PCB-10, para-0032); a second PCB (20, para-0032); a transinductor core (30) sandwiched between the first and second PCBs (10, 20), wherein the transinductor core (30) includes at least one slot (space or gap) exposing the first and second PCBs (10, 20); and at least one electrically conductive pillar (12 or 22) extending through the at least one slot (the windings wounded around the core having slots) that electrically connects the first PCB to the second PCB. As to claim 2, Konishi discloses the at least one slot comprises a plurality of slots (figure 2 shows the slots where the windings wounded), and the at least one electrically conductive pillar (12, 22) comprises pairs of primary and secondary winding pillars (12, 22), each of the pairs of primary and secondary winding pillars disposed in a different one of the plurality of slots (the primary windings 12 formed on top of the PCB 10, and the secondary windings 22 formed on top f the second PCB 20, see figure 2). As to claim 7, Konishi discloses the transinductor core (T or 30) as shown in figure 2 comprises: first and second side portions (left and right portions); a central portion (a middle portion) sandwiched between the first and second side portions, the at least one slot (the space or opening or gap) comprises a plurality of slots formed between the first side portion and the central portion and/or the second side portion and the central portion. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Konishi in view of Jain et al. (U.S. 2011/0249472). Regarding claim 14, Konishi discloses the at least one slot (the space or opening of the core) comprises a plurality of slots, see figure 2, the at least one electrically conductive pillar comprises a plurality of primary winding pillars (12), each disposed in one of the plurality of slots and forming a single-turn primary winding for the transinductor core (30), and the power delivery module of Konishi does not specifically comprise a controller configured to perform pulse width modulation phase sequencing of the plurality of primary winding pillars based on a configuration of the transinductor core. Jain teaches a DAB converter (20) comprising a controller configured to perform pulse width modulation (PWM, para-0025) phase sequencing of the plurality of primary winding pillars (para-0029, element 26) based on a configuration of the transinductor core. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date to have a teaching of Jain employed in the power module of Konishi in order to provide configuration manages the timing and electrical pulse widths sent to individual magnetic core pillars in a multi-phase power system. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Konishi in view of Pacala et al. (U.S. Patent 6,972,657). Regarding claim 3, Konishi discloses all the limitations of claimed invention except for a tab extending into one of the plurality of slots, the tab disposed between one of the pairs of primary and secondary winding pillars and configured to vary a leakage inductance between the one of the pairs of primary and secondary winding pillars. Pacala teaches a power converter and planar transformer (12) as shown in figures 2a-2b comprising a tab (14c, 16c) extending into one of the plurality of slots (space or openings), the tab disposed between one of the pairs of primary and secondary winding pillars (12p, 12s) and configured to vary a leakage inductance between the one of the pairs of primary and secondary winding pillars. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date to have a teaching of Pacala employed in the power module of Konishi in order to adjust input or output voltage levels and compensating for high or low utility supply lines to maintain a steady secondary voltage. Claim(s) 8-10, 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Konishi in view of Gieras et al. (U.S. 2019/0006096). Regarding claim 8, Konishi discloses all the limitations of claimed invention except for the central portion includes a plurality of crossbars that extend towards the first side portion and the second side portion, the plurality of crossbars defining the plurality of slots. Gieras teaches transformer-inductor assembly (100 or 200) as shown in figures 2-6 comprising the central portion includes a plurality of crossbars (116) that extend towards the first side portion and the second side portion, the plurality of crossbars (116) defining the plurality of slots (216, 218). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date to have a teaching of Gieras employed in the power module of Konishi in order to increase magnetic field strength. Regarding claim 9, Konishi as modified by Gieras teaches the central portion includes at least one tab (the tab formed between the bars 116) between the plurality of crossbars (116) that extends into one of the plurality of slots (216, 218). Regarding claim 10, Konishi as modified by Gieras teaches at least one electrically conductive pillar comprises a primary and secondary winding pillar (220, 222), each disposed on a different side of the tab (the tab formed between the bars 116). As to claim 15, Konishi discloses a power delivery module (1) as shown in figures 1-3, comprising: a first printed circuit board (PCB-10, para-0032); a second PCB (20, para-0032); at least one transinductor core (30) sandwiched between the first and second PCBs (10, 20), wherein each transinductor core (30) comprises: first and second side portions (left and right portions); a central portion (a middle portion) sandwiched between the first and second side portions, the at least one slot (the space or opening or gap) comprises a plurality of slots formed between the first side portion and the central portion and/or the second side portion and the central portion. pairs of electrically conductive pillar (12, 22) extending through the plurality of slots that electrically connect the first and second PCBs (10, 20), each of the pairs of electrically conductive pillars forming primary and secondary windings (12, 22) for the at least one transinductor core (30). Konishi does not specifically disclose the central portion including a plurality of crossbars that extend towards the first side portion and the second side portion, the plurality of crossbars defining a plurality of slots. Gieras teaches transformer-inductor assembly (100 or 200) as shown in figures 2-6 comprising the central portion includes a plurality of crossbars (116) that extend towards the first side portion and the second side portion, the plurality of crossbars (116) defining the plurality of slots (216, 218). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date to have a teaching of Jain employed in the power module of Konishi in order to increase magnetic field strength. Claim(s) 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Konishi in view of Gieras, and further in view of Pacala et al. (U.S. Patent 6,972,657). Regarding claim 16, Konishi as modified by Gieras discloses all the limitations of claimed invention except for a tab extending into one of the plurality of slots, the tab disposed between one of the pairs of primary and secondary winding pillars and configured to vary a leakage inductance between the one of the pairs of primary and secondary winding pillars. Pacala teaches a power converter and planar transformer (12) as shown in figures 2a-2b comprising a tab (14c, 16c) extending into one of the plurality of slots (space or openings), the tab disposed between one of the pairs of primary and secondary winding pillars (12p, 12s) and configured to vary a leakage inductance between the one of the pairs of primary and secondary winding pillars. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date to have a teaching of Pacala employed in the power module of Konishi and Gieras in order to adjust input or output voltage levels and compensating for high or low utility supply lines to maintain a steady secondary voltage. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-6, 11-13, 17-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 20 is allowed. Neither the references cited nor the cited references teach, suggest, or in combination of a power delivery module having a central portion sandwiched between the first side portion and the second side portion, the central portion including a plurality of crossbars that extend towards the first side portion and the second side portion, the plurality of crossbars defining a plurality of slots; a plurality of interconnect pillars external to the transinductor core that extend between the first PCB and the second PCB; a plurality of conductive traces formed at the first PCB and the second PCB that electrically connect, via the plurality of interconnect pillars, the pairs of electrically conductive pillars in a winding arrangement; and a controller configured to perform pulse width modulation (PWM) phase sequencing of the primary winding associated with each of the pairs of electrically conductive pillars. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUAN T DINH whose telephone number is (571)272-1929. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-5pm, M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Dole can be reached at 571-272-2229. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUAN T DINH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2847
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740147
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733099
ELECTRONICS PACKAGING FOR MOVING PLATFORMS
4y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12733100
REDUCING PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD AREA FOR SINGLE-SIDED PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727086
FLEXIBLE CIRCUIT BOARD AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THEREOF
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720682
EFFICIENT ASSEMBLY FOR ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORS ON SOLID STATE DRIVES
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.1%)
2y 11m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1197 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month