Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/916,977

FLUID DELIVERY MOUNTING PANEL AND SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 16, 2024
Priority
Apr 29, 2021 — divisional of 11/624,450 +1 more
Examiner
ARUNDALE, ROBERT K
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Applied Materials Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
593 granted / 786 resolved
+5.4% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
811
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
62.5%
+22.5% vs TC avg
§102
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
§112
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 786 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement(s) was/were filed in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement(s) was/were considered by the examiner. Election/Restrictions Claims 18-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 04/24/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 9, 11-12, 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Harris et al. (U.S. Publication 2004/0173270), hereinafter “Harris”. In regards to claim 1, Harris discloses an apparatus comprising: a mounting panel comprising a plurality of metal plates (502, 504, see also para. [0039]) that form :a reservoir (508) to contain a process fluid; and multiple channels (flow path through plate 502 which interconnects 508 to 710) through which to flow the process fluid, wherein at least a pair of the multiple channels are connected with the reservoir (508); and a temperature sensor (see paras. [0029] and [0049] which disclose flow control devices such as temperature sensors are attached to the top side of the top panel), attached to a top of the mounting panel, in fluid communication with the reservoir (508) through one of a plurality of vias (710) formed in the mounting panel. Regarding "diffusion -bonded" as recited in claim 1, the patentability of a product does not depend on its method of production. If the product in the product-by-process claim is the same as or obvious from a product in the prior art, the claim is unpatentable even though the prior product was made by a different process (see MPEP 2113). Merriam-Webster defines “reservoir” as “a part of an apparatus in which a liquid is held.” Channels 508 contain process fluid. Accordingly, under broadest reasonable interpretation, the office interprets channel 508 as a reservoir. In regards to claims 2, 11 and 12, the mounting panel comprises the plurality of vias, further comprising a pressure sensor attached to a top of the mounting panel, the pressure sensor in fluid communication with the reservoir through a second of the plurality of vias. See para. [0029] which discloses that temperature and pressure sensors may be coupled to the panel and Figs. 6 and 7 which illustrate a plurality of vias 710 fluidly coupled to a singular channel 508. In regards to claim 3, the mounting panel further comprises a plurality of orifices (615) that are sized and adapted for attaching process fluid control components to the mounting panel, further comprising a plurality of the process fluid control components including: the temperature sensor; a set of inlet ports (405, 410, 412), attached to the mounting panel, to receive the process fluid; and at least one outlet port (440), attached to the mounting panel, to output the process fluid from the mounting panel. In regards to claims 9 and 16 , Harris discloses that the system may include valves, mass flow controllers and measurement devices. It is the office’s position that such disclosure is inclusive of a flow sensor. Like the temperature sensor necessitated in claim 1, the flow sensor may be in fluid communication with a first channel (flow path through plate 502 which interconnects 508 to 710) of the multiple channels through a second via of the plurality of vias, wherein the flow sensor is to sense a rate of flow of the process fluid through the first channel. In regards to claim 16, see also the rejection of claim 11. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-8, 10, 13-15 and 17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to R.K. Arundale whose telephone number is 571-270-3453. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday (9:30AM-6:00PM EST). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisors can be reached by phone. Kenneth Rinehart can be reached at 571-272-4881, and Craig Schneider can be reached at 571-272-3607. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /ROBERT K ARUNDALE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680642
COMPACT FLUID COUPLINGS
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680429
TAIL PLUG AND ASSEMBLY FOR GAS LIFT VALVE
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674445
Valves with Overdriven Protection
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12675123
ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED REGULATOR
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12663025
SAFETY VALVE, PNEUMATIC ACTUATOR, AND VEHICLE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.3%)
2y 4m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 786 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month