Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/919,058

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTING REAL-TIME ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS WITH A TRANSACTION ACCELERATOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 17, 2024
Priority
Jun 04, 2021 — continuation of 12/141,600
Examiner
DEBROW, JAMES J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Worldpay LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
364 granted / 520 resolved
+10.0% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
537
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§103
59.5%
+19.5% vs TC avg
§102
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§112
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 520 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is responsive to: Application filed 17 Oct. 2024 Claims 1-20 are pending in this case. Claims 1, 11 and 18 are independent claims Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Alexander, IV et al. (Pub. No.: US 2006/0004655 A1; Filed: Jun. 30, 2005) (hereinafter “Alexander”). Regarding independent claims 1, 11 and 18, Alexander disclose a computer-implemented method comprising: receiving, by one or more processors, a settled transaction data from a system associated with a user (0004; 0043); transmitting, by the one or more processors, the settled transaction data to an accelerator system or a standard system based on predetermined preferences of the user (0023; 0060); determining, by the one or more processors, availability of amount in an accelerator account or a standard account associated with the user based on preconfigured rules (0007; 0029-0031; 0035-0036; 0045-0046; 0051; 0060); transmitting, by the one or more processors, disbursements from the accelerator account or the standard account to a plurality of recipients at predetermined time thresholds (0029-0031; 0035-0036; 0045-0046; 0051; 0060); and updating, by the one or more processors, the accelerator account or the standard account based on the settled transaction data (0029-0031; 0035-0036; 0045-0046; 0051; 0060). Regarding dependent claims 2, 12 and 19, Alexander disclose the computer-implemented method of claims 1, 11 and 18 respectively, wherein the settled transaction data includes one or more transaction settlement batches from one or more transactions executed by the user (0045-0046; 0048). Regarding dependent claims 3, 13 and 20, Alexander disclose the computer-implemented method of claims 1, 11 and 18 respectively, wherein receiving the settled transaction data from the system associated with the user, comprises: determining, by the one or more processors, the user is a participating user with an account in a processing system or a non-participating user without an account in the processing system (0005-0007; 0060-0063); and transmitting, by the one or more processors, the settled transaction data associated with the participating user to the accelerator system or the standard system (0005-0007; 0060-0063); or enrolling, by the one or more processors, the non-participating user to open the account in the processing system (0005-0007; 0060-0063). Regarding dependent claims 4 and 14, Alexander disclose the computer-implemented method of claims 1 and 11 respectively, wherein the predetermined preferences include a standard transaction processing through the standard system or an accelerated transaction processing through the accelerator system (0060-0063). Regarding dependent claims 5 and 15, Alexander disclose the computer-implemented method of claims 1 and 11 respectively, wherein the predetermined preferences include a percentage of the settled transaction data specified for an accelerated transaction processing through the accelerator system and a remaining percentage of the settled transaction data specified for a standard transaction processing through the standard system (0003; 0007; 0051; 0060). Regarding dependent claims 6 and 16, Alexander disclose the computer-implemented method of claims 4 and 14 respectively, wherein the standard transaction processing causes the amount to become available in the standard account upon clearance from the standard system (0046; 0051; 0060). Regarding dependent claims 7 and 17, Alexander disclose the computer-implemented method of claims 4 and 14 respectively, wherein the accelerated transaction processing causes the amount to become available in the accelerator account in real-time (0046; 0051; 0060). Regarding dependent claim 8, Alexander disclose the computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the accelerator account is updated in real-time based on the disbursements to the plurality of recipients or receiving by the accelerator account the disbursed amount from an account associated with an entity (0029-0031; 0035-0036; 0045-0046; 0051; 0060). Regarding dependent claim 9, Alexander disclose the computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising: determining, by the one or more processors, a settlement value in accordance with the settled transaction data based on the predetermined preferences, wherein the settlement value represents a value equivalent to the settled transaction data specified for acceleration (0029-0031; 0035-0036; 0045-0046; 0051; 0060). Regarding dependent claim 10, Alexander disclose the computer-implemented method of claim 9, further comprising: storing, by the one or more processors, the settlement value, in real-time, in an accelerated transaction database associated with the accelerator account (0046). NOTE It is noted that any citations to specific, pages, columns, lines, or figures in the prior art references and any interpretation of the reference should not be considered to be limiting in any way. A reference is relevant for all it contains and may be relied upon for all that it would have reasonably suggested to one having ordinary skill in the art. See MPEP 2123. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES J DEBROW whose telephone number is (571)272-5768. The examiner can normally be reached on 09:00 - 06:00. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Bashore can be reached on 571-272-4088. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center and the Private Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center or Private PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center or Private PAIR to authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center or the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /James J Debrow/ Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 2174 571-272-5768
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 17, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12730545
OPERATION ASSISTING DEVICE, OPERATION ASSISTING METHOD, AND OPERATION ASSISTING PROGRAM
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12718005
System, Method, and Computer Program Product for Identifying and Representing Events Using a Machine-Learning Model
1y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12711304
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR STASHING OF DOCUMENT ALTERATION INFORMATION FOR QUICKER WEB PREVIEW
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12705104
PRESERVING AND MODIFYING VIRTUAL MACHINE SETTINGS IN REPLICATION-BASED VIRTUAL MACHINE MIGRATION
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699835
Collision Avoidance For Document Field Placement
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+25.7%)
3y 3m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 520 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month