Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Worldpay LLC

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

22 pending office actions • 13 art units • 21 examiners • 0 of 22 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 48 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Worldpay LLC currently manages 25 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed among 22 distinct examiners and 13 distinct art units. HUANG, JAY is the busiest examiner with 3 busiest examiner pending actions. The 13 distinct art units indicate that the company's e-commerce and mechanical innovations are reviewed by several technical groups.

With 22 distinct examiners for the 25 pending office actions, the workload is spread relatively evenly, with only a few examiners handling more than one case. This distribution means the company must navigate various individual examiner styles and interpretations. The 3 busiest examiner pending actions assigned to HUANG, JAY represent a portion of the 25 pending office actions. Practitioners should coordinate across the 22 distinct examiners to ensure consistent prosecution outcomes.

The 13 distinct art units suggest that the portfolio touches on several specialized groups within the USPTO. Managing 25 pending office actions across these units requires an understanding of the specific technical standards applied by each group. Because the 22 distinct examiners are spread across 13 distinct art units, there is variety in the technical scrutiny applied to the applications. This structure requires a strategy that accounts for both individual examiner preferences and art unit trends.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

22
Total Pending OAs
13
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
3
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
4
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (4)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

18
Hard (82%)
3
Medium (14%)
1
Easy (5%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only12 (55%)
§101 + other5 (23%)
§103 only2 (9%)
§102 only1 (5%)
Double-patenting only1 (5%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (5%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
5% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
17
Mechanical / Eng
77% of docket
4
Business / Other
18% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

220 h
Manual time on pending OAs
44 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
77 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KAZIMI, HANI M 2 48.5% +19.4%
ASGARI, SIMA 1 26.0% +19.7%
BUNKER, WILLIAM B 1 80.2% +94.9%
ADE, OGER GARCIA 1 75.3% -2.5%
MAYE, AYUB A 1 57.8% +41.4%
LEE, CLAY C 1 54.7% +57.5%
DEBROW, JAMES J 1 70.0% +25.7%
BUSCH, CHRISTOPHER CONRAD 1 28.8% +21.0%
TORRICO-LOPEZ, ALAN 1 29.1% +37.8%
KWONG, CHO YIU 1 32.3% +4.3%

Hard Cases (19)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18631355 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURE AUTHENTICATION OF A DEVICE DURING A SERVICE KWONG, CHO YIU 3d overdue
17934678 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING TRANSACTION CONVERSION RATE USING MACHINE LEARNING NEWLON, WILLIAM D 2d overdue
17933960 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMPUTER ANALYTICS OF ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN STORED PRODUCTS AND COMPLETED ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION EVENTS AUSTIN, JAMIE H 19d
18343943 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZED ROUTING OF ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACROSS MULTIPLE ACQUIRER PROCESSORS MALKOWSKI, MARK A 28d
18893261 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION AUTHORIZATIONS BASED ON CONSUMER DEVICE ACTIVITY BUSCH, CHRISTOPHER CONRAD 29d
18326197 SYSTEMS, METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR VARIABLE SETTLEMENT ACCOUNTS HILMANTEL, ADAM J 29d
19400109 TOKENIZING SENSITIVE DATA ASGARI, SIMA —
19246384 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING SHARED DATABASES FOR MANAGING SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENT SOURCES BUNKER, WILLIAM B —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18893261 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION AUTHORIZATIONS BASED ON CONSUMER DEVICE ACTIVITY BUSCH, CHRISTOPHER CONRAD 29d
19400109 TOKENIZING SENSITIVE DATA ASGARI, SIMA —
19246384 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING SHARED DATABASES FOR MANAGING SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENT SOURCES BUNKER, WILLIAM B —
19015016 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EMBEDDED SERVICES PLATFORM MAYE, AYUB A —
18985352 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SECURELY FACILITATING CROSS-PLATFORM TOKEN COMPATIBILITY VIA MULTI-TOKENIZATION LEE, CLAY C —
18926943 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPORTING A BATCH OF RECEIVER ACCOUNTS ONTO AN APPLICATION PLATFORM OF A REAL-TIME PAYMENT NETWORK KAZIMI, HANI M —
18919058 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTING REAL-TIME ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS WITH A TRANSACTION ACCELERATOR DEBROW, JAMES J —
18794987 BROWSER PLUG-IN ENABLING USE OF EMV CARD INFORMATION KAZIMI, HANI M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3691 2
3625 2
3693 2
3696 2
3622 2
3698 1
2436 1
3699 1
3621 1
3619 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19400109 TOKENIZING SENSITIVE DATA ASGARI, SIMA 3698 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 25, 2025
19246384 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING SHARED DATABASES FOR MANAGING SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENT SOURCES BUNKER, WILLIAM B 3691 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 23, 2025
19074895 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DIRECT ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION OF CONSUMER INFORMATION ADE, OGER GARCIA — §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 10, 2025
19015016 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EMBEDDED SERVICES PLATFORM MAYE, AYUB A 2436 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 09, 2025
18985352 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SECURELY FACILITATING CROSS-PLATFORM TOKEN COMPATIBILITY VIA MULTI-TOKENIZATION LEE, CLAY C 3699 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 18, 2024
18926943 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPORTING A BATCH OF RECEIVER ACCOUNTS ONTO AN APPLICATION PLATFORM OF A REAL-TIME PAYMENT NETWORK KAZIMI, HANI M — §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 25, 2024
18919058 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTING REAL-TIME ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS WITH A TRANSACTION ACCELERATOR DEBROW, JAMES J — §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 17, 2024
18893261 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION AUTHORIZATIONS BASED ON CONSUMER DEVICE ACTIVITY BUSCH, CHRISTOPHER CONRAD 3621 §101 Final Rejection 29d Pending Sep 23, 2024
18794987 BROWSER PLUG-IN ENABLING USE OF EMV CARD INFORMATION KAZIMI, HANI M — §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 05, 2024
18792023 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA ANALYTICS AND ELECTRONIC DISPLAYS THEREOF TO PAYMENT FACILITATORS AND SUB-MERCHANTS TORRICO-LOPEZ, ALAN 3625 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 01, 2024
18631355 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURE AUTHENTICATION OF A DEVICE DURING A SERVICE KWONG, CHO YIU 3693 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Apr 10, 2024
18488233 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA SECURITY HUANG, JAY 3619 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 17, 2023
18343943 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZED ROUTING OF ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACROSS MULTIPLE ACQUIRER PROCESSORS MALKOWSKI, MARK A 3696 §101 Final Rejection 28d Pending Jun 29, 2023
18335468 TECHNOLOGIES FOR ATTRIBUTING ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS TO TARGETED ELECTRONIC CONTENT DISTRIBUTION CAMPAIGNS CIRNU, ALEXANDRU 3622 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 15, 2023
18326197 SYSTEMS, METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR VARIABLE SETTLEMENT ACCOUNTS HILMANTEL, ADAM J 3691 §101 Final Rejection 29d Pending May 31, 2023
18322229 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SUBSTITUTE LOW-VALUE TOKENS IN SECURE NETWORK TRANSACTIONS NILFOROUSH, MOHAMMAD A 3697 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending May 23, 2023
18167439 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA AGGREGATION FOR TRANSACTION SETTLEMENT USING MACHINE LEARNING JAMES, GREGORY MARK 3692 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 10, 2023
18056396 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MONITORING ONLINE TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN REGISTERED USERS AND SERVICE PROVIDERS BY A TRAINED MACHINE LEARNING MODEL MANDEL, MONICA A 3622 §101§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 17, 2022
17934678 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING TRANSACTION CONVERSION RATE USING MACHINE LEARNING NEWLON, WILLIAM D 3696 §101 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Sep 23, 2022
17933960 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMPUTER ANALYTICS OF ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN STORED PRODUCTS AND COMPLETED ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION EVENTS AUSTIN, JAMIE H 3625 §101§112 Non-Final OA 19d Pending Sep 21, 2022
16843495 FLEXIBLE ENGINE FOR PROCESSING STORED VALUE PAYMENT VEHICLES WARDEN, MICHAEL J 3694 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 08, 2020
16781321 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FRAUD PREVENTION IN ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS BY IDENTIFYING AND LINKING TRANSACTIONS BY UNIQUE IDENTIFIERS WONG, ERIC TAK WAI 3693 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 04, 2020

Managing Worldpay LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month