Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/923,827

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AN INTERNET OF THINGS DEVICE REGISTRY DISPLAY

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Oct 23, 2024
Priority
Apr 16, 2021 — provisional 63/175,920 +1 more
Examiner
ADDY, THJUAN KNOWLIN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Somos Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
982 granted / 1100 resolved
+29.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1119
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
§103
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§102
43.9%
+3.9% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1100 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-34 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The invention as claimed is not disclosed nor rendered obvious in view of any prior art. As to independent claims 1, 13, and 24, all prior art fail to teach or suggest, alone or in combination, the recited apparatus and method. However, claims 1-34 are currently rejected under a nonstatutory double patenting rejection. A response is respectfully requested of Applicant. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-12 and 24-34 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 10 of U.S. Patent No. 12,155,657. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 10 of U.S. Patent No. 12,155,657 recites “An apparatus, comprising: a user input processing circuit structured to interpret one or more user input command values … a device lookup circuit structured to: generate a query that includes the one or more IoT UIDs; and retrieve device property data corresponding to the one or more IoT UIDs; a query provisioning circuit structured to transmit the query to an IoT device registrar server … and a display circuit structured to display the device property data with the corresponding one or more IoT UIDs”, and claim 1 of the present application recites “An apparatus, comprising: at least one processor … receive one or more user input command values; determine, based at least in part on the one or more user input command values, one or more devices registered with an IoT device registry via corresponding Internet of Things Universal Identifications (IoT UIDs); and display property data for the one or more devices”, and claim 24 recites “An apparatus, comprising: … an Internet of Things Universal Identification (IoT UID) received … and a record management circuit structured to retrieve device property data corresponding to the IoT UID, wherein … transmit the device property data …”. U.S. Patent No. 12,155,657 An apparatus, comprising: a user input processing circuit structured to interpret one or more user input command values … a device lookup circuit structured to: generate a query that includes the one or more IoT UIDs; and retrieve device property data corresponding to the one or more IoT UIDs; a query provisioning circuit structured to transmit the query to an IoT device registrar server … and a display circuit structured to display the device property data with the corresponding one or more IoT UIDs Application 18/923,827 (claim 1) An apparatus, comprising: at least one processor … receive one or more user input command values; determine, based at least in part on the one or more user input command values, one or more devices registered with an IoT device registry via corresponding Internet of Things Universal Identifications (IoT UIDs); and display property data for the one or more devices Application 18/923,827 (claim 24) An apparatus, comprising: … an Internet of Things Universal Identification (IoT UID) received … and a record management circuit structured to retrieve device property data corresponding to the IoT UID, wherein … transmit the device property data … Claims 13-23 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,155,657. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,155,657 recites “A method, comprising: interpreting, via a user input processing circuit, one or more user input command values; determining, via an Internet of Things Universal Identification (IoT UID) identification circuit, one or more IoT UIDs, based at least in part on the one or more user input command values; generating, via a device lookup circuit … transmitting, via a query provisioning circuit, the query to an IoT device registrar server … displaying, via a display circuit, the device property data with the corresponding one or more IoT UIDs”, and claim 13 of the present application recites “A method, comprising: generating, via at least one processor, a graphical user interface structured to: receive one or more user input command values; and communicate with an Internet of Things (IoT) device registrar server … determining, via the at least one processor, one or more devices registered with an IoT device registry via querying the IoT device registrar server, based at least in part on the one or more user input command values; and displaying device property data for the one or more devices received in response to querying the IoT device registrar server”. U.S. Patent No. 12,155,657 A method, comprising: interpreting, via a user input processing circuit, one or more user input command values; determining, via an Internet of Things Universal Identification (IoT UID) identification circuit, one or more IoT UIDs, based at least in part on the one or more user input command values; generating, via a device lookup circuit … transmitting, via a query provisioning circuit, the query to an IoT device registrar server … displaying, via a display circuit, the device property data with the corresponding one or more IoT UIDs Application 18/923,827 A method, comprising: generating, via at least one processor, a graphical user interface structured to: receive one or more user input command values; and communicate with an Internet of Things (IoT) device registrar server … determining, via the at least one processor, one or more devices registered with an IoT device registry via querying the IoT device registrar server, based at least in part on the one or more user input command values; and displaying device property data for the one or more devices received in response to querying the IoT device registrar server Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Winter et al. (US Patent No. 10,826,684) teach a system and method of validating Internet of Things (IoT) devices. Wadekar et al. (US Patent Application, Pub. No.: US 2018/0234294 A1) teach a system and method for configuring IoT devices. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THJUAN KNOWLIN ADDY whose telephone number is (571)272-7486. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30AM - 5:00PM Mon-Fri. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ahmad Matar can be reached at (571) 272-7488. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THJUAN K ADDY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2693
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707189
Display Device
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12694341
CONTEXTUAL AWARENESS SUBSYSTEM FOR AUGMENTED HEARING
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12688875
COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD FOR COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12689862
HEARING AID CONTROL METHOD, AND HEARING AID DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12684068
SYSTEM AND METHOD TO DETERMINE AND REMEDIATE REVERSE TRANSITION FROM DIGITAL CHANNELS IN A CONTACT CENTER
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+6.3%)
2y 5m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1100 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month