Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Somos Inc.

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Communications

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Somos Inc. is navigating 4 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. This workload is spread across 4 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units, suggesting a high level of examiner variety per action. With 4 distinct examiners for 4 pending office actions, the company's current prosecution is entirely decentralized, with each matter being reviewed by a different individual.

PICH, PONNOREAY is the busiest examiner for this set of filings, with 1 pending office action currently assigned. Since all 4 distinct examiners are handling exactly 1 of the 4 pending office actions, the designation of a busiest examiner is shared among the group. Practitioners must therefore develop 4 separate examiner-specific strategies to successfully advance these 4 pending office actions.

The distribution of these actions across 3 distinct art units further indicates that the company's Communications filings are not concentrated in a single specialized group. This requires the applicant to address the specific prior art and procedural expectations of 3 different art units. Effectively managing 4 pending office actions across 4 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units requires a broad-based approach to patent advocacy that accounts for multiple examiner perspectives.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
4
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
50% of docket
2
Communications
50% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WEI, XIAOMING 1 82.0% +17.3%
MADANI, FARIDEH 1 77.7% +19.3%
ALMAMUN, ABDULLAH 1 78.0% +25.8%
SHAUGHNESSY, AIDAN EDWARD 1 18.8% +1.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18304722 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION USING VIRTUAL REALITY WEI, XIAOMING 28d

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17722122 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT FOR REGISTERED INTERNET OF THINGS UNIVERSAL ID (IOT DEVICES) SHAUGHNESSY, AIDAN EDWARD 13d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18304722 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION USING VIRTUAL REALITY WEI, XIAOMING 28d
17865668 TELECOMMUNICATIONS CALL VALIDATION PLATFORM MADANI, FARIDEH —
17722012 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AN INTERNET OF THINGS DEVICE REGISTRY ALMAMUN, ABDULLAH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2611 1
2643 1
2431 1
2432 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18304722 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION USING VIRTUAL REALITY WEI, XIAOMING 2611 §103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Apr 21, 2023
17865668 TELECOMMUNICATIONS CALL VALIDATION PLATFORM MADANI, FARIDEH 2643 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 15, 2022
17722012 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AN INTERNET OF THINGS DEVICE REGISTRY ALMAMUN, ABDULLAH 2431 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 15, 2022
17722122 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT FOR REGISTERED INTERNET OF THINGS UNIVERSAL ID (IOT DEVICES) SHAUGHNESSY, AIDAN EDWARD 2432 §103 Final Rejection 13d Pending Apr 15, 2022

Managing Somos Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month