Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/924,576

VIBRATIONAL DAMPER FOR ELEVATED TEMPERATURES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 23, 2024
Examiner
FULLER, ROBERT EDWARD
Art Unit
3676
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
654 granted / 830 resolved
+26.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
870
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
37.2%
-2.8% vs TC avg
§102
30.8%
-9.2% vs TC avg
§112
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 830 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Species I in the reply filed on December 29, 2025 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 7-10 and 16-19 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4-6, 12, 14, and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Schlumberger (US 2,363,269). With regard to claim 1, Schlumberger discloses a work string (see any of Figs. 1-4), comprising: an outer member (see annotated Fig. below); an inertial mass disposed within the outer member (see annotated Fig. below—note that the identified elements have mass and thus can be considered “inertial mass,” given that they inherently possess some amount of inertia); and a damping element (see Fig. below—note that whether Schlumberger discloses the molten sulfur being utilized as a damping element is given little patentable weight. Molten sulfur inherently provides a damping function, given that applicant’s specification teaches that such a dampening ability is a property of liquid sulfur—see primarily paragraph 0019) between the outer member and the inertial mass, the damping element including a liquid (i.e. molten sulfur) having a viscosity that increases with increasing temperature (applicant’s specification explains that liquid sulfur has this property—see paragraph 0019). PNG media_image1.png 408 584 media_image1.png Greyscale With regard to claim 4, the liquid is one of: (i) liquid sulfur (Schlumberger teaches liquid sulfur); (ii) aqueous suspension of calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)₂; and (iii) aqueous suspension of iron (III) oxide Fe₂O₃. With regard to claim 5, the outer member (12) is an outer tubular of the work string and the inertial mass is an inner tubular (heater element 22 has a tubular shape and thus can be considered an “inner tubular”) of the work string. With regard to claim 6, Schlumberger teaches that the work string further comprises one of: (i) a drill string; (ii) a production string; and (iii) a completion string (tubular 34 can at least be considered a “completion string”). With regard to claim 12, Schlumberger discloses a method of absorbing a vibration at a work string (note that, while Schlumberger does not explicitly discuss absorbing vibration, Schlumberger does provide a liquid sulfur within an outer tubular, and applicant’s specification teaches that such liquid sulfur provides vibration dampening properties), comprising: disposing a damping element (see annotated Fig. provided above) between an outer member (see Fig. above) and an inertial mass (see Fig. above) disposed within the outer member, wherein the damping element includes a liquid (i.e. molten sulfur) having a viscosity that increases with increasing temperature (applicant’s specification teaches that liquid sulfur has this property at paragraph 0019); and absorbing the vibration being transferred from the outer member to the inertial mass via the damping element (liquid sulfur inherently provides this function due to its material properties—see applicant’s specification at paragraph 0019). With regard to claim 14, Schlumberger teaches that the liquid is one of: (i) liquid sulfur (Schlumberger teaches liquid sulfur); (ii) aqueous suspension of calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)₂; and (iii) aqueous suspension of iron (III) oxide Fe₂O₃. With regard to claim 15, Schlumberger teaches that the outer member (12) is an outer tubular of the work string and the inertial mass is an inner tubular of the work string (element 22 has a tubular shape and thus can be considered an “inner tubular”). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 3, 13, and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT E FULLER whose telephone number is (571)272-6300. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30AM - 5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tara Schimpf can be reached at 571-270-7741. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT E FULLER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3676
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589696
APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR VEHICLE CENTER CONSOLE LID STORAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590496
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SUPPORTING A COLLAR REGION OF A BLAST HOLE DURING DRILLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584377
DELAYED OPENING PORT ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584388
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZATION OF WELLBORE OPERATIONS OF PRODUCING WELLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577857
SINGLE TRIP COMPLETION SYSTEM WITH OPEN HOLE GRAVEL PACK GO/STOP PUMPING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+2.6%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 830 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month