Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/927,224

CONTROL DEVICE FOR VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 25, 2024
Priority
Apr 25, 2022 — JP 2022-071270 +1 more
Examiner
SHAAWAT, MUSSA A
Art Unit
3669
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Denso Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
697 granted / 910 resolved
+24.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
924
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
§103
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§102
34.7%
-5.3% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 910 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Examiner Notes: The applicant elected Species I, fig. 4 and pages 10-14 (first embodiment) without traverse which refer to claims 1-6 and 19, where claims 1 and 19 are generic claims. Claims 7-18 are hereby withdrawn from consideration. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Noguchi US Pg. Pub. No. (2020/0361464) referred to hereinafter as Noguchi in view of Schmidt et al., US pg. Pub. No. (2005/01251070 referred to hereinafter as Schmidt. As per claim 1, Noguchi teaches a control device for a vehicle (see at least Para 0016, 0020, figs. 1-2), comprising: a drive force acquisition unit that acquires a drive force which the vehicle is applying to a road surface (see at least Para21, 24-25, 31-33, figs. 2-3); an acceleration acquisition unit that acquires an acceleration along a travel direction of the vehicle (see at least Para 0019, figs. 1); Although Noguchi teaches step-equivalent angle alpha (see at least Para 40-41), Noguchi does not expressly teach an angle calculation unit that calculates a trajectory angle which is an angle between a trajectory of a rotation center axis of a wheel of the vehicle and the road surface, based on the drive force and the acceleration, However Schmidt teaches an angle calculation unit that calculates a trajectory angle (see at least Para 33-34, fig. 1) which is an angle between a trajectory of a rotation center axis of a wheel of the vehicle and the road surface (see at least Para 33-43), based on the drive force and the acceleration (see at least Para 33-43, 38-43). It would be have bene obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the time of filing of the invention to incorporate the teachings of Schmidt into the disclosure of Noguchi in order to account for the dynamic forces acting on the vehicle. As per claim 2, Noguchi teaches a control device according to claim 1, further comprising a ride-over determination unit (see at least Para 23, 26-27, fig. 2) that determines whether the vehicle should ride over a bump (see at least Para 45-48, fig. 6) based on the trajectory angle (see at least 40-41, 45-48, 38-43). As per claim 3, Noguchi teaches a control device according to claim 2, further comprising a brake/drive force control unit (see at least Para 21-23, 30, figs. 2, 8) that controls a brake/drive force of the vehicle, wherein the brake/drive force control unit controls the brake/drive force to cause the vehicle to ride over the bump, when the ride-over determination unit determines that the vehicle should ride over the bump, and the brake/drive force control unit controls the brake/drive force to cause the vehicle to not ride over the bump, when the ride-over determination unit determines that the vehicle should not ride over the bump (see at least Para 56-58, 54-55, fig. 8). Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Noguchi in view of Schmidt in further view of Kollner et al., US Pg. Pub. No. (2010/0026224) referred to hereinafter as Kollner. As per claim 6, Noguchi in view of Schmidt teache vehicle includes a rotating electric machine for generating the drive force (see Noguchi Para 16, fig. 1), However Noguchi in view of Schmidt do not expressly teach the drive force acquisition unit acquires the drive force based on a magnitude of current flowing through the rotating electric machine , However Kollner teaches the drive force acquisition unit acquires the drive force based on a magnitude of current flowing through the rotating electric machine (see at least fig. 2 equation 1). It would have bene obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing of the invention to incorporate the teachings of Kollner into the disclosure of Noguchi in view of Schmidt in order to account for the dynamic forces acting on the vehicle. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Please refer to form 892 for cited references. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUSSA A SHAAWAT whose telephone number is (313)446-6592. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Erin Piateski can be reached at 571-270-7429. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MUSSA A SHAAWAT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3669
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 25, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747025
PROVIDING ENERGY IN AN AIRCRAFT USING DROOP CONTROL
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746909
BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLE
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741548
VEHICLE WITH ELECTRIC DRIVE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SUCH A VEHICLE
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742673
Systems and Methods for Determining a Weight Rating of a Transporter
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735194
SMART IOT CONTROLLER FOR GATHERING AND TRANSMITTING AIRCRAFT HEALTH INFORMATION DURING FLIGHT
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+5.8%)
2y 12m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 910 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month