Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/928,302

LIGHTING DEVICE HAVING A REMOTELY CONTROLLABLE LIGHTING DISTRIBUTION

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 28, 2024
Examiner
LEE, WILSON
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Maxlite Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
572 granted / 659 resolved
+18.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
682
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§103
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
§102
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
§112
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 659 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 10-12, 14-18 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections – 35 U.S.C. 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 10-12, 14-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Henderson et al. (2023/0180371) in view of Shinohara et al. (2025/0216514). Regarding Claim 10, Henderson et al. (2023/0180371) discloses a method for remotely changing light distribution patterns controlling lighting characteristics of an outdoor overhead lighting device having a downward light throw (paragraph [0095]), the lighting device (light fixture) having a freeform lens (106) (paragraph [0260], Fig. 54A, B), configured to accommodate a plurality of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) (“array of LEDs 24 includes multiple LED strings 38) (paragraph [0094] and fig. 2), a processing device (30) (fig. 2), and a transceiver (receive commands from remote device, paragraph [0005]; “receiver and/or transmitter”, paragraph [0233]), power different subsets of the LEDs (power a different LED string, paragraph [0172]) to selectively generate the plurality of discrete light distribution patterns (when the different LED string is powered, the light distribution pattern through the lens is inherently generated), the method comprising: wirelessly receiving, via the transceiver, a command from an external user device (by mobile remote device 16, fig. 1) to adjust generate a desired light distribution pattern (power a different LED string, paragraph [0172]) selected from the plurality of discrete light distribution patterns (when the different LED string is powered, the light distribution pattern through the lens is inherently generated); and selectively activating, by the processing device, a specific subset of the LEDs (power different LED string, paragraph [0172]) based on the received command (e.g. through the mobile remote device 16) to achieve the desired light distribution pattern (powering different LED string renders desired light distribution). As discussed above, Henderson essentially discloses the claimed invention but does not explicitly disclose LEDs being positioned under the freeform lens to emit light towards the freeform lens wherein the freeform lens has a geometry which allows for a plurality of discrete light distribution patterns to be generated depending on the positioning of activated LEDs under the freeform lens, the geometry of the freeform lens permitting light. However, Shinohara et al. (2025/0216514) discloses that a freeform lens (2) has a geometry (fig. 5) which allows for a plurality of discrete light distribution patterns to be generated depending on the positioning of activated LEDs under the freeform lens, the geometry of the freeform lens permitting light (Figs. 5, 9). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have provided a freeform lens of Shinohara in Henderson to transmit light to in order to provide desired light distribution pattern (Fig. 5 of Shinohara) at desired locations as taught by Shinohara Regarding Claim 11, Henderson discloses the method of claim 10, further comprising: detecting, by one or more sensors, environmental factors surrounding the lighting device (“measuring ambient light, paragraph [0004]; ambient light sensors, paragraph [0033, “detect modulated light via an ambient light”, paragraph [0120]]); and wherein the selectively activating the specific subset of the LEDs (power different LED string, paragraph [0172]) includes automatically activating, by the processing device, the subset of the LEDs to achieve the desired light distribution pattern where the desired light distribution pattern is determined by the detected environmental factors (detection of ambient light or occupancy, paragraph [0091]) and predefined algorithms stored in a memory of the lighting device (stored profiles, paragraph [0236]). Regarding Claim 12, Henderson discloses the method of claim 10, further comprising wirelessly transmitting, via the transceiver, a command (paragraphs [0084], [0088], [0089], fig. 1)to a second outdoor overhead lighting device (the term “lighting fixtures” is a plural form, paragraph [0084], fig. 1) to adjust a light distribution pattern (power a different LED string, paragraph [0172]) of the second outdoor overhead lighting device (when the different LED string is powered, the light distribution pattern through the lens is inherently generated). Regarding Claim 14, as discussed above, Henderson essentially discloses the claimed invention but does not explicitly disclose the method of claim 10, wherein the command from the external user device is sent using a smartphone app. However, Henderson discloses mobile remote device (16) to send command to control the light (fig. 1) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have provided a smartphone app in the mobile remote device in Henderson in order to obtain the convenience of controlling the light. Regarding Claim 15, Henderson discloses the method of claim 10, further comprising storing multiple lighting profiles (stored profiles, paragraph [0236]) in a memory of the lighting device (Fig. 2). Regarding Claim 16, Henderson discloses the method of claim 10, further comprising using machine learning (machine learning) to predict future lighting needs based on sensor data (sensor inputs) (Abstract). Regarding Claim 17, Henderson discloses the method of claim 10, wherein the transceiver is configured to operate using radio frequency technology (radio frequency, known RF ranging technique, paragraph [0123]). Regarding Claim 18, Henderson discloses the method of claim 11, wherein the detected environmental factors include daylight (“measuring ambient light, paragraph [0004]; ambient light sensors, paragraph [0033], “detect modulated light via an ambient light”, paragraph [0120]). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Examiner Wilson Lee whose telephone number is (571) 272-1824. Proposed amendment and interview agenda can be submitted to Examiner’s direct fax at (571) 273-1824. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, examiner’s supervisor, Alexander Taningco can be reached at (571) 272-8048. Papers related to the application may be submitted by facsimile transmission. Any transmission not to be considered an official response must be clearly marked "DRAFT". The official fax number is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. For more information about the Patent Center, see https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /WILSON LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 30, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12627018
Rat-race balun and associated method for reducing the footprint of a rat-race balun
2y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12614851
DISPLAY MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12614860
FREIGHT CONTAINER SIDE-MOUNTED ANTENNA
1y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12603258
PLASMA PROCESSING APPARATUS AND PLASMA PROCESSING METHOD
2y 12m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12586891
ANTENNA DEVICE
1y 7m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+3.1%)
2y 9m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 659 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month