Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/930,812

HEAT EXCHANGE DEVICE AND VEHICLE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 29, 2024
Priority
Jun 10, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0075242
Examiner
TANENBAUM, TZVI SAMUEL
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Kia Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
12m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
529 granted / 779 resolved
-2.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
801
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
68.5%
+28.5% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 779 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-11, 13-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shimota (US 20180347909) in view of Andre (US 11827090). Regarding claim 1, Referring to at least Figs. 1, 4, Shimota teaches a heat exchange device 100 comprising: a heat exchanger 10 that defines a flow passage configured to carry a heat exchange fluid (see par. 15); an air guide 20 that is disposed at a side of the heat exchanger and defines an interior space 20a, the air guide having (i) a first side in fluid communication with an outside of the air guide (e.g. at 25, 42) and (ii) a second side 26 in fluid communication with the heat exchanger. Shimota does not teach a rotator disposed at the first side of the air guide and configured to rotate about a rotation axis. Andre, directed to an air guide for a vehicle heat exchanger, teaches a rotator 18 disposed at a first side of an air guide 4 and configured to rotate about a rotation axis (see col 3, lines 49-60). Andre teaches that said rotator 18 advantageously varies the flow rate of an air stream (including shutting off an air flow as needed, see col 3, lines 49-55). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to modify Shimota by Andre with the motivation of advantageously varying the flow rate of an air stream into the air guide 20. Regarding claim 2, Shimota teaches wherein the air guide further defines an introduction space 42 that connects the outside of the air guide to the interior space 20a, the introduction space being defined at a lower area of the air guide. Regarding claim 3, Shimota as modified above teaches wherein at least a portion of the rotator is disposed in the introduction space or faces the introduction space in a forward/rearward direction of the heat exchange device (e.g. as Andre teaches that said rotator 18 should be disposed at an introduction space, see Andre Fig. 2). Regarding claim 4, Shimota as modified above teaches wherein at least a portion of the introduction space is defined at a rear side of the rotator (e.g. as Andre teaches wherein at least a portion of an introduction space is defined at a rear side of the rotator, see Andre Fig. 2). Regarding claim 5, Shimota teaches wherein the interior space is defined at an area of the air guide, the area of the air guide facing the rotator in an upward/downward direction of the heat exchange device. Regarding claim 6, Shimota teaches wherein the air guide has an area (not labeled) that faces the rotator in an upward/downward direction of the heat exchange device and is spaced apart from the interior space (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 7, Shimota as modified above teaches wherein the air guide includes: a first area (not labeled, see Fig. 2), wherein at least a portion of the first area faces the rotator in an upward/downward direction of the heat exchange device; and a second area that is connected to a rear side of the first area and defines at least a portion of the interior space, wherein the rotator and the second area of the air guide are spaced apart from each other in a forward/rearward direction of the heat exchange device, and wherein a lower end of the second area is located at a lower end of the first area (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 8, Shimota teaches wherein the first area of the air guide includes an inclined surface (not labeled, see Fig. 2) that is disposed at a front section of the first area, the inclined surface being inclined upward as the first area extends to a rear side of the first area. Regarding claim 9, Shimota teaches wherein the air guide further includes: a third area (not labeled) connected to a rear side of the second area, the third area connecting the second area and the heat exchanger and defining at least a portion of the interior space, and wherein a width of the introduction space in a leftward/rightward direction of the heat exchange device is greater than a width of the third area in the leftward/rightward direction (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 10, Shimota teaches wherein a height of the third area in the upward/downward direction of the heat exchange device is greater than a height of each of the first area and the second area in the upward/downward direction. Regarding claim 11, Shimota as modified above teaches wherein the rotator comprises a plurality of blades not labeled) that are arranged about the rotation axis (see Andre Fig. 2). Regarding claim 13, Shimota as modified above does not specifically teach a motor configured to provide power for rotating the rotator about the rotation axis but the examiner takes official notice that the use of a motor for rotating a rotator about a rotation axis would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art. Regarding claim 14, Shimota teaches wherein the first area, the second area, and the third area are separately provided parts of the air guide, wherein the first area and the second area are fixedly coupled to each other, wherein the second area and the third area are fixedly coupled to each other, and wherein the third area and the heat exchanger are fixedly coupled to each other. Regarding claim 15, Shimota teaches wherein the first area, the second area, and the third area are provided integrally. Regarding claim 16, Shimota as modified above teaches wherein the plurality of blades protrude outward from the rotation axis and extend along the rotation axis. Regarding claim 17, Shimota as modified above does not teach wherein the plurality of blades are orthogonal to one another, but the examiner takes official notice that the use of orthogonal blades in rotator (e.g. a shut off valve or louver) would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art. Regarding claim 18, Shimota teaches a vehicle; the heat exchange device of claim 1; and an under-cover 6 coupled to a lower area of the air guide, wherein the air guide further defines an introduction space that connects the outside of the air guide to the interior space, and wherein the under-cover defines a through-hole at an area of the under-cover that faces the introduction space (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 19, Shimota as modified above teaches wherein a lower end of the rotator is located at a lower side of a lower surface of the under-cover. Regarding claim 20, Shimota as modified above wherein at least a portion of the rotator is configured to protrude downward relative to the under-cover based on rotating about the rotation axis (e.g. as Shimota teaches that air is advantageously introduced into the air guide via protruding portions relative to an under-cover, see col 3, lines 25-32). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 12 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 12, Shimota as modified by Andre does not teach wherein each of the plurality of blades has a front surface configured to be convex toward a rear side based on a corresponding one of the plurality of blades being located lower than the rotation axis. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Ajisaka, Yamakawa, Tajima, and Maurer teach underbody air guides for vehicles. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVE S TANENBAUM whose telephone number is (313)446-6522. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 11 AM - 7 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Frantz Jules can be reached at (571) 272-6681. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Steve S TANENBAUM/Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680704
PACKAGED TERMINAL AIR CONDITIONER (PTAC) WITH AN INTEGRATED ENERGY RECOVERY VENTILATOR (ERV) OR HEAT RECOVERY VENTILATOR (HRV)
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679628
TRANSPORT CONTAINER FOR TRANSPORTING TEMPERATURE-SENSITIVE GOODS TO BE TRANSPORTED, SAID CONTAINER COMPRISING CONTAINER WALLS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12656026
Liquid Desiccant Air Conditioner Modules Having Aerodynamic Features
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12656035
OBSTRUCTION DETECTION FOR A HEAT PUMP WATER HEATER SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12646727
Additional Cooling Pack with Fans to Handle and Peak Shave Fuel Cell Transients and High Ambient Temperatures
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+9.8%)
2y 8m (~12m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 779 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month