Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/936,436

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PLANK PROCESSING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 04, 2024
Priority
Jun 30, 2022 — continuation of 12/162,179
Examiner
MUDD, HENRY HOOPER
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Shaw Industries Group Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
242 granted / 346 resolved
+9.9% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
371
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
48.3%
+8.3% vs TC avg
§102
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
§112
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 346 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restriction The Examiner acknowledges that the Applicant has elected claims 23-24 for examination without traverse. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 23-24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being unpatentable over Hardwick (US Pat. 7,288,310 B2). Regarding claim 23, Hardwick discloses a floor covering product (Abstract, lines 1-7: “The present invention relates generally to a process for manufacturing resilient floor and wall tiles and the products obtained thereby. More particularly, the invention relates to resilient tiles which have been individually cut, routed and mechanically embossed on two adjacent edges to give the appearance that each individual tile has grout lines on two adjacent edges”) comprising a bevel at an edge adjacent to a bottom surface thereof (Col. 2, lines 19-22: Again, the saw optionally creates a slight beveled edge which runs from the top surface of the tile to the top surface of the remaining portion of the substrate. (See FIG. 5)”), the bevel being formed by: die punching at least one resilient slab into plural resilient planks (Col. 2, lines 3-4: “The tile is then finish cut with a die cutter to a final dimension of nominal tile size”); forming, by a shaping tool, a bevel in at least one bottom edge of each of the plural resilient planks to create a profiled plank (The bevel is formed with a skimming saw); wherein the shaping tool is a profiler configured to form the bevel conveying, by a plank conveyor, the plural resilient planks to a first de-stacker; de-stacking, by the first de-stacker, the plural resilient planks into individual ones of the plural resilient planks; conveying the individual ones of the plural resilient planks to the shaping tool; conveying the profiled planks to a second de-stacker; and feeding, by the second de-stacker, the profiled planks to the plank conveyor (The conveyance of the plank is irrelevant to the structure of said plank). Regarding claim 24, Hardwick discloses a resilient plank (Abstract, lines 1-7: “The present invention relates generally to a process for manufacturing resilient floor and wall tiles and the products obtained thereby. More particularly, the invention relates to resilient tiles which have been individually cut, routed and mechanically embossed on two adjacent edges to give the appearance that each individual tile has grout lines on two adjacent edges”) comprising a bevel at an edge adjacent to a bottom surface thereof (Col. 2, lines 19-22: Again, the saw optionally creates a slight beveled edge which runs from the top surface of the tile to the top surface of the remaining portion of the substrate. (See FIG. 5)”), the bevel being formed by: die punching at least one resilient slab into plural resilient planks (Col. 2, lines 3-4: “The tile is then finish cut with a die cutter to a final dimension of nominal tile size”); forming, by a shaping tool, a bevel in at least one bottom edge of each of the plural resilient planks to create a profiled plank (The bevel is formed with a skimming saw); wherein the shaping tool is a profiler configured to form the bevel conveying, by a plank conveyor, the plural resilient planks to a first de-stacker; de-stacking, by the first de-stacker, the plural resilient planks into individual ones of the plural resilient planks; conveying the individual ones of the plural resilient planks to the shaping tool; conveying the profiled planks to a second de-stacker; and feeding, by the second de-stacker, the profiled planks to the plank conveyor (The conveyance of the plank is irrelevant to the structure of said plank). Conclusion The prior art discloses numerous patents with similar subject matter as the claimed invention. Dempsey (US 7550192 B2), Maxwell (US 4471012 A), Vandevoorde (US 10829942 B2), and Litral (US 9127459 B2) all disclose flooring products containing a beveled edge. The elected inventions comprise apparatus claims that rely heavily on the process of fabricating and processing said flooring products. Apparatus claims largely do not require the method steps of the instant application as long as they can prove they disclose the final product. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HENRY HOOPER MUDD whose telephone number is (571)272-5941. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Michener can be reached at 5712721467. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HENRY HOOPER MUDD/Examiner, Art Unit 3642 /JOSHUA J MICHENER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 04, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745754
AGILITY PERFORMANCE SYSTEM
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12714066
FEEDING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FEEDING ANIMALS
4y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12714082
FISHING DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12690567
PULLEY SYSTEM ALLOWING FOR PASSAGE OF OBJECT ATTACHED TO LINE
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690573
LURE
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+24.0%)
2y 3m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 346 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month