Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026

Shaw Industries Group Inc.

8 pending office actions • 7 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 17 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (38%)
5
Medium (62%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (50%)
Double-patenting + other1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (38%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
12% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
62% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN 1 60.9% +41.9%
NGUYEN, UYEN T 1 39.7% +36.5%
KRUER, KEVIN R 1 26.9% +29.6%
KATCHEVES, BASIL S 1 72.2% +17.2%
WEYDEMEYER, ETHAN 1 44.0% +44.3%
MAESTRI, PATRICK J 1 73.2% +15.0%
PHILLIPS, FORREST M 1 83.2% +14.6%
MARKMAN, MAKENA 1 59.0% +40.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18713738 ACOUSTIC ARTICLE, DECORATIVE ELEMENT, AND SYSTEM COMPRISING SAME PHILLIPS, FORREST M 20d

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19189416 Laminated Article And Method Of Forming Same KRUER, KEVIN R 46d overdue
19101165 LAMINATED ARTICLE AND METHOD OF FORMING SAME WEYDEMEYER, ETHAN 46d overdue
18146025 BLADE GRINDING SYSTEMS AND METHODS MARKMAN, MAKENA 25d overdue
18771224 Surfacing Products With Multiple Veneer Segments MAESTRI, PATRICK J 14d

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19189416 Laminated Article And Method Of Forming Same KRUER, KEVIN R 46d overdue
19101165 LAMINATED ARTICLE AND METHOD OF FORMING SAME WEYDEMEYER, ETHAN 46d overdue
18146025 BLADE GRINDING SYSTEMS AND METHODS MARKMAN, MAKENA 25d overdue
19228264 Yarn With Sections Having Different Aesthetic Characteristics, Articles Comprising Same, And Methods Of Making Said Yarn And Articles LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN 13d
18771224 Surfacing Products With Multiple Veneer Segments MAESTRI, PATRICK J 14d
18713738 ACOUSTIC ARTICLE, DECORATIVE ELEMENT, AND SYSTEM COMPRISING SAME PHILLIPS, FORREST M 20d
19220656 System For Handling And Processing Yarn NGUYEN, UYEN T
19112049 GROOVED DECORATIVE ARTICLE KATCHEVES, BASIL S

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3732 2
1787 1
3633 1
1783 1
3635 1
2837 1
3723 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19228264 Yarn With Sections Having Different Aesthetic Characteristics, Articles Comprising Same, And Methods Of Making Said Yarn And Articles LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN 3732 §103 Final Rejection 13d Pending Jun 04, 2025
19220656 System For Handling And Processing Yarn NGUYEN, UYEN T 3732 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA Pending May 28, 2025
19189416 Laminated Article And Method Of Forming Same KRUER, KEVIN R 1787 §103 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Apr 25, 2025
19112049 GROOVED DECORATIVE ARTICLE KATCHEVES, BASIL S 3633 §103 Final Rejection Pending Mar 14, 2025
19101165 LAMINATED ARTICLE AND METHOD OF FORMING SAME WEYDEMEYER, ETHAN 1783 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Feb 04, 2025
18771224 Surfacing Products With Multiple Veneer Segments MAESTRI, PATRICK J 3635 §102§103 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Jul 12, 2024
18713738 ACOUSTIC ARTICLE, DECORATIVE ELEMENT, AND SYSTEM COMPRISING SAME PHILLIPS, FORREST M 2837 §103 Final Rejection 20d Pending May 28, 2024
18146025 BLADE GRINDING SYSTEMS AND METHODS MARKMAN, MAKENA 3723 §103§112 Final Rejection 25d overdue Pending Dec 23, 2022

Managing Shaw Industries Group Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month