Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/936,807

DYNAMIC CURRENT PROTECTION FOR SERVER LOADS

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Nov 04, 2024
Examiner
PATEL, DHARTI HARIDAS
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LENOVO GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY (UNITED STATES) INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1103 granted / 1263 resolved
+19.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
1275
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
42.8%
+2.8% vs TC avg
§102
43.9%
+3.9% vs TC avg
§112
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1263 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Claim 15 recites, “A computer program product comprising a computer readable storage medium and computer program instructions stored therein that, when executed, are configured to… ”. The broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim drawn to a program (also called computer readable medium, machine readable medium and other such variations) typically covers forms of non-transitory tangible media and transitory propagating signals per se in view of the ordinary and customary meaning of computer readable media, particularly when the specification is silent. See MPEP 2111.0 I. See In re Nuijten, 500 F.3d 1346,1356-57 (Fed. Cir. 2007). A claim drawn to such a program that covers both transitory and non-transitory embodiments may be amended to narrow the claim to cover only statutory embodiments to overcome a rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 101 by adding the limitation "non-transitory" to the claim, such that it reads: “A computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable storage medium and computer program instructions stored therein that, when executed, are configured to… ”. Claims 16-20 depend from 15 and therefore inherit the same defect. These claims should be amended to read “The non-transitory program …”. Reasons for Allowance Claims 1-14 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance of claims 1 and 8: The prior art by Bonaccio et al. Publication No. US 2008/0143373 discloses a method and system that allow operation of an electronic device to be controlled after a device manufacturer, wherein the system comprises: a plurality of computer components [Fig. 5, module 1 to module N]; a plurality of electric fuses [Fig. 5, 506]; wherein each of the electronic fuses are programmed after the manufacturing and testing processes for the electronic device have been completed [par. 0025 to par. 0032]. However, none of the prior art discloses a method that comprises the following steps of: during an initial startup procedure of a system that includes a plurality of computer components, programming one or more limits of a programmable eFuse (electronic fuse) based on configuration data associated with each of the plurality of computer components; and enabling, prior to completing the initial startup procedure of the system, the programmable eFuse with the one or more limits; and performing, while the eFuse is enabled, a test on the plurality of computer components using the eFuse. This feature in combination with the rest of the claim limitations is not anticipated or rendered obvious by the prior art of record. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DHARTI PATEL whose telephone number is (571)272-8659. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 9 AM - 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thienvu Tran can be reached at 571-270-1276. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DHARTI PATEL Primary Examiner Art Unit 2836 /DHARTI H PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 04, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706599
GATE DRIVER CIRCUIT FAULT DETECTION TECHNIQUES
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706449
COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, MANAGEMENT DEVICE, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700557
ELECTROMECHANICAL SWITCH
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695291
ANALOG STATUS SIGNALIZATION AND SYNCHRONIZATION BETWEEN INTEGRATED CIRCUITS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695297
SURGE PROTECTION MODULE AND SURGE PROTECTION DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+7.7%)
2y 3m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1263 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month