Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/938,529

ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CARRYING OUT ROUNDS AND AUTOMATIC DATA ACQUISITION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 06, 2024
Priority
Nov 12, 2023 — BR 1020230236944
Examiner
ARTHUR JEANGLAUDE, GERTRUDE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allowance Rate
1436 granted / 1546 resolved
+32.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1560
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
§103
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1546 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claim language “allows recording the transcription of spoken notes” is unclear. Claims 2-9 are rejected for incorporating the deficiencies of their base claim. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the transcription of spoken notes" in lines 31-32. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 9 recites the limitation "the user " in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 9 recites the limitation "the next variable" in line 15. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The prior art does not specifically disclose An electronic device for carrying out rounds and automatic data acquisition, the device comprising: a body containing on-board electronics; a screen embedded in the body, having an electronic system positioned therein, the electronic system including power control electronics for energy management associated with the use of rechargeable lithium-ion cells, an information processing and storage system, controls for controlling sensors and actuators, an interface with biometric reader with on-board fingerprint identification algorithm, and I/O voltage controllers, the screen also having information I/O capacity to communicate with a controller board; a rod fixed to the body, the rod having a trigger-type button creating an ornamental gun appearance; wherein the interface has a sound acquisition device containing a MEMS-type sensor, has direct current vibration micromotors, visual LEDs and piezoelectric-type sound indicators; an RFID sensor for identifying the equipment and reading operating parameters through a tag and the communication occurs via radio waves; software having a logic system for a microcontroller and communication through a network communication device such as Wi-Fi and/or Bluetooth, allowing acquisition of route data or updating of the route, with uploading of the data collected in the routes to the servers; and audio processing circuits for use of microphone and speaker, with the aid of algorithms for noise reduction, wherein the software allows for sound or visual alerts, and has an API that allows recording the transcription of spoken notes. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. White et al. (U.S. Pub No. 20140118114) disclose a bridge board for enhancing functionality on a Data Acquisition Device (DAD). The bridge board is configured to be in data communication with the DAD, and the DAD configured to be selectively fired upon receipt of firing instructions from the bridge board. When fired, the DAD is configured to acquire and store DAD data, if DAD data is available for acquisition. In preferred embodiments, the bridge board is configured to allow the DAD to communicate with a controller via serial communication using a 3-wire cable. The bridge board is further configured to generate enhanced DAD data, the enhanced DAD data comprising enhancements made by the bridge board to DAD data received by the bridge board from the DAD. The bridge board thus enables the controller to acquire data from multiple types of DAD, different both in genus and in species, and different in levels of functionality and capability. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GERTRUDE ARTHUR JEANGLAUDE whose telephone number is (571)272-6954. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday, 7:30-8:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ramya P Burgess can be reached at 571-272-6011. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GERTRUDE ARTHUR JEANGLAUDE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3661
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12686425
WAYSIDE DEVICE MONITORING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12680276
CONSTRUCTION MACHINE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681507
SOFTWARE AND ASSEMBLY FOR POINTING AND TILTING SOLAR PANELS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676473
DEVICES AND PROCESSES FOR ARC SUPPRESSION IN ELECTRICAL PANELS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673557
CONTROL METHOD AND CONTROL DEVICE FOR MOTOR OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE, AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE INCLUDING CONTROL DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+4.5%)
2y 1m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1546 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month