Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/940,092

ADJUSTABLE WAFER CHUCK

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 07, 2024
Priority
Aug 15, 2022 — continuation of 12/165,898
Examiner
COMBER, KEVIN J
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
709 granted / 857 resolved
+14.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
875
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
83.8%
+43.8% vs TC avg
§102
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 857 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 21-40 are pending in this application. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement(s) (IDS) submitted on 11/07/2024 is/are in compliance with the provisions of 37 C.F.R. § 1.97. Accordingly, the IDS has/have been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 31, 39, and 40 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Liao et al. U.S. Patent Application 2019/0096734 (hereinafter “Liao”). Regarding claim 31, Liao teaches an apparatus (i.e. system 40)(fig.3), comprising: a base portion (i.e. wafer table 10)(figs.3 and 1B) comprising a first adjustable base structure (i.e. first base structure in the figure below)(fig.1B) and a second adjustable base structure (i.e. second base structure in the figure below)(fig.1B) laterally surrounds the first adjustable base structure (implicit); a pad portion (refer to pins 16)(fig.1B) comprising a first plurality of contact pads (refer to pin connected to first base structure in the figure below)(fig.1B)(refer also to first pins/base structures/actuators in the figure below)(fig.1A) affixed to the first adjustable base structure (implicit) and a second plurality of contact pads (refer to pins connected to second base structure in the figure below)(fig.1B)(refer also to second pins/base structures/actuators in the figure below)(fig.1A) affixed to the second adjustable base structure (implicit); and a first actuator (refer to mechanism 18 connected to the first base structure in the figure below)(fig.1B) coupled to the first adjustable base structure (implicit) and configured to move the first plurality of contact pads along a vertical plane to adjust a first vertical distance to a wafer (refer to [0020], [0023] and [0024]). PNG media_image1.png 453 580 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 376 664 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 39, Liao teaches a method, the method comprising: placing a wafer (i.e. wafer 70)(fig.3) onto a wafer chuck (i.e. wafer table 10)(fig.3), wherein the wafer chuck comprises a first contact pad (refer to pin connected to first base structure in the figure above)(fig.1B)(refer also to first pins/base structures/actuators in the figure above)(fig.1A) affixed to a first adjustable base structure (i.e. first base structure in the figure above)(fig.1B)(refer also to [0020]) and a second contact pad (refer to pins connected to second base structure in the figure above)(fig.1B)(refer also to second pins/base structures/actuators in the figure above)(fig.1A) affixed to a second adjustable base structure (i.e. second base structure in the figure above)(fig.1B)(refer also to [0020]); determining a vertical distance between the wafer and the first contact pad (refer to [0020], [0023] and [0024]); and moving the first adjustable base structure along a vertical plane based on the vertical distance (refer to [0020], [0023] [0024], and [0035]), so that the first contact pad contacts the wafer about equally as the second contact pad (refer to [0035]). Regarding claim 40, Liao teaches the method of claim 39, wherein the vertical distance is determined by providing a first electrical signal to a controller via a sensor (i.e. one or more sensors 62)(fig.3)(refer also to [0023], [0024], and [0035]), and wherein the first adjustable base structure is moved by an actuator (i.e. mechanism 18)(fig.1B), in response to the first electrical signal being outside a predefined range (refer to [0035]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 33-35 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liao as applied to claim 31 above, and further in view of Lin et al. U.S. Patent Application 2007/0236857 (hereinafter “Lin”). Regarding claim 33, Liao teaches the apparatus of claim 31, further comprising a first sensor (i.e. one or more optical sensors 62)(fig.3) configured to determine the first vertical distance (refer to [0023] and [0024]); however, Liao does not teach the first sensor coupled to the first plurality of contact pads. However, Lin teaches the first sensor (refer to first sensor in the figure below)(fig.5) coupled to the first plurality of contact pads (refer to figure 5). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the apparatus of Liao to include the sensors of Lin to provide the advantage of sensing each pin individually to allow for fine control of the vertical height of the pins, thereby allowing for better flattening of the wafer. PNG media_image3.png 639 622 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 34, Liao and Lin teach the apparatus of claim 33, further comprising: a second actuator (refer to Liao mechanism 18 connected to the first base structure in the figure above)(fig.1B) coupled to the second adjustable base structure (implicit), wherein the second actuator is configured to move the second plurality of contact pads along the vertical plane to adjust a second vertical distance to the wafer (refer to Liao [0020], [0023] and [0024]); and a second sensor (i.e. Lin second sensor in the figure above)(fig.5) coupled to the second plurality of contact pads (refer to Lin figure 5) and configured to determine the second vertical distance (refer to Liao [0020], [0023] and [0024])(refer also to Lin [0048]), wherein the first sensor is configured to generate a first electrical signal that corresponds to the first vertical distance (refer to Liao [0020], [0023] and [0024])(refer also to Lin [0048]), and wherein the first actuator is configured to move the first adjustable base structure based on the first electrical signal (refer to Liao [0020], [0023] and [0024])(refer also to Lin [0048]), and wherein the second sensor is configured to generate a second electrical signal that corresponds to the second vertical distance in which the second plurality of contact pads are vertically spaced from the wafer (refer to Liao [0020], [0023] and [0024])(refer also to Lin [0048]), and wherein the second actuator is configured to move the second adjustable base structure based on the second electrical signal (refer to Liao [0020], [0023] and [0024])(refer also to Lin [0048]). Regarding clam 35, Liao and Lin teach the apparatus of claim 34, further comprising: a controller (i.e. Liao controller 80)(fig.3)(i.e. Lin length control device 140)(fig.5) electrically coupled to the first sensor, the second sensor, the first actuator, and the second actuator (implicit)(refer to Lin figure 5)(refer also to Liao figure 3), wherein: in response to receiving the first electrical signal, the controller controls the first actuator to move the first adjustable base structure along the vertical plane, thereby changing the first vertical distance (refer to Liao [0020], [0023], [0024], and [0035])(refer also to Lin [0048]); and in response to receiving the second electrical signal, the controller controls the second actuator to move the second adjustable base structure along the vertical plane, thereby changing the second vertical distance (refer to Liao [0020], [0023], [0024], and [0035])(refer also to Lin [0048]). Claim(s) 36 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liao and Lin as applied to claim 34 above, and further in view of Caldwell et al. U.S. Patent Application 2005/0087939 (hereinafter “Caldwell”). Regarding claim 36, Liao and Lin teach the apparatus of claim 34; however, they do not teach the apparatus further comprising: a first chucking electrode coupled to the first adjustable base structure; and a second chucking electrode coupled to the second adjustable base structure. However, Caldwell teaches the apparatus further comprising: a first chucking electrode (refer to electrostatic pins 21)(fig.4) coupled to the first adjustable base structure (implicit); and a second chucking electrode (refer to electrostatic pins 21)(fig.4) coupled to the second adjustable base structure (implicit). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the apparatus of Liao and Lin to include the electrodes of Caldwell to provide the advantage of clamping the wafer to the pins, thereby minimizing deformations between the pins. Claim(s) 21, 22, 24, 25, and 27-30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liao and further in view of Caldwell. Regarding claim 21, Liao teaches an apparatus (i.e. system 40)(fig.3), comprising: a plurality of adjustable base structures (i.e. linkage 20)(fig.1B) arranged one next to another along a horizontal plane (implicit)(refer to fig.1B) and configured to be movable along a vertical plane perpendicular to the horizontal plane (refer to [0020], [0023] and [0024]); and a plurality of contact pads (i.e. pins 16)(fig.1B) affixed to the plurality of adjustable base structures (implicit)(refer to figure 1B and [0020]), wherein the plurality of contact pads locates at positions that are configured to contact a wafer (i.e. wafer 70)(fig.3)(refer also to abstract and [0023]); however, Liao does not teach the plurality of contact pads locates at positions that are configured to clamp a wafer. However, Caldwell teaches the plurality of contact pads locates at positions that are configured to clamp a wafer (refer to electrostatic pins 21)(fig.4). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the apparatus of Liao to include the plurality of contact pads of Caldwell to provide the advantage of clamping the wafer to the pins, thereby minimizing deformations between the pins. Regarding claim 22, Liao and Caldwell teach the apparatus of claim 21, wherein the plurality of adjustable base structures is configured to move independently in both up and down directions along the vertical plane (refer to Liao [0024])(refer also to Caldwell [0022]). Regarding claim 24, Liao and Caldwell teach the apparatus of claim 21, further comprising: a plurality of actuators (i.e. Liao mechanism 18)(fig.1B) coupled to the plurality of adjustable base structures, respectively (implicit)(refer to [0020] and fig.1B), wherein the plurality of actuators are configured to respectively move the plurality of adjustable base structures along the vertical plane (refer to [0020]). Regarding claim 25, Liao and Caldwell teach the apparatus of claim 24, further comprising: a plurality of chucking electrodes (refer to Caldwell electrostatic pins 21)(fig.4) coupled to the plurality of adjustable base structures, respectively (implicit); and a plurality of sensors (i.e. Liao one or more optical sensors 62)(fig.3)(refer also to [0023]) that are configured to generate a plurality of electrical signals that correspond to distances between the plurality of contact pads and the wafer (refer to Liao [0023], [0024], and [0035]), wherein the plurality of actuators are configured to move the plurality of adjustable base structures based on the electrical signals (refer to Liao [0023], [0024], and [0035]). Regarding claim 27, Liao and Caldwell teach the apparatus of claim 21, wherein the plurality of adjustable base structures is configured to move along the vertical plane to compensate for a height difference of the plurality of contact pads (refer to Liao [0023], [0024], and [0035]) so that each of the plurality of contact pads contacts the wafer during a fabrication step (refer to Liao [0023], [0024], and [0035]). Regarding claim 28, Liao and Caldwell teach the apparatus of claim 21, wherein the plurality of adjustable base structures is configured to move along the vertical plane to compensate for a distance difference between various locations of the wafer and the horizontal plane (refer to Liao [0023], [0024], and [0035]), so that each of the plurality of contact pads contacts the wafer during a fabrication step (refer to Liao [0023], [0024], and [0035]). Regarding claim 29, Liao and Caldwell teach the apparatus of claim 21; however, they do not teach wherein each of the plurality of adjustable base structures has a thickness between about 25 millimeters (mm) and about 35 mm. However, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have wherein each of the plurality of adjustable base structures has a thickness between about 25 millimeters (mm) and about 35 mm., since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or working ranges involves only routine skill in the art. In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the apparatus of Liao and Caldwell to include wherein each of the plurality of adjustable base structures has a thickness between about 25 millimeters (mm) and about 35 mm to provide the advantage of optimizing the size of the adjustable base structures to allow for enough strength to properly flatten the wafer while minimizing the size of the structures. Regarding claim 30, Liao and Caldwell teach the apparatus of claim 21; however, they do not teach wherein each of the contact pads has a height between about 0.5 millimeters (mm) and about 5 mm. However, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have wherein each of the contact pads has a height between about 0.5 millimeters (mm) and about 5 mm, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or working ranges involves only routine skill in the art. In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the apparatus of Liao and Caldwell to include wherein each of the contact pads has a height between about 0.5 millimeters (mm) and about 5 mm to provide the advantage of optimizing the size of the contact pads to allow for enough height to conform to the deformations within the wafer to properly flatten the wafer. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 23, 26, 32, 37, and 38 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 23 is indicated as containing allowable subject matter because prior art fails to teach or suggest, either alone or in combination all of the limitations of claim 23, especially wherein each of the plurality of adjustable base structures has a ring-like shape concentric to one another. Claim 26 is indicated as containing allowable subject matter because prior art fails to teach or suggest, either alone or in combination all of the limitations of claim 26, especially a power supply electrically coupled to the plurality of chucking electrodes, wherein the plurality of sensors determine the distances by measuring electrical resistances between the plurality of chucking electrodes and the power supply. Claim 32 is indicated as containing allowable subject matter because prior art fails to teach or suggest, either alone or in combination all of the limitations of claim 32, especially wherein the first adjustable base structure and the second adjustable base structure are ring shaped and concentric about a center point. Claims 37 and 38 are indicated as containing allowable subject matter because prior art fails to teach or suggest, either alone or in combination all of the limitations of claim 37, especially a first electrical connector electrically coupled to the first chucking electrode, wherein the first electrical connector is configured to provide an electrical connection between the first chucking electrode and a first power supply; and a second electrical connector electrically coupled to the second chucking electrode, wherein the second electrical connector is configured to provide an electrical connection between the second chucking electrode and a second power supply. Claim 38 is indicated as containing allowable subject matter due to its dependency on claim 37. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEVIN J COMBER whose telephone number is (571)272-6133. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00 am - 5:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thienvu V. Tran can be reached at 571-270-1276. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KEVIN J COMBER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679701
LIFTING MAGNET AND STEEL PLATE LIFTING APPARATUS, AND STEEL PLATE CONVEYING METHOD
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679213
PROTECTION DEVICE FOR VOLTAGE-LIMITING ELEMENTS OF A LOW-VOLTAGE LINE THAT EXTENDS OUT OF A VEHICLE HIGH-VOLTAGE REGION
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683523
ELECTROSTATIC CHUCK WITH PERFORATED OR SCREENED CHUCKING ELECTRODE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676467
POWER CORD PHOTOCOUPLER LEAKAGE CURRENT DETECTION INTERRUPTER (LCDI) AND ELECTRICAL APPLIANCE USING SAME
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671405
Self-Biased Power Switching Circuitry
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+11.5%)
2y 4m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 857 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month