Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/940,963

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANUFACTURING AND DEPOSITING NANO-SCALE MATERIALS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 08, 2024
Priority
Nov 08, 2023 — provisional 63/597,050
Examiner
VETERE, ROBERT A
Art Unit
1712
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Battelle Savannah River Alliance LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
Est. Remaining
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allowance Rate
541 granted / 886 resolved
-3.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
936
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
85.7%
+45.7% vs TC avg
§102
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§112
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 886 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Group I in the reply filed on 4/3/26 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 12-20 have been withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 4/3/26. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hunyadi Murph et al. (US 2021/0380405) in light of O’Connell et al. (“Liquid Ink Deposition from an Atomic Force Microscope Tip: Deposition Monitoring and Control of Feature Size,” Langmuir 2014, 30, pp. 2712-21). Claims 1, 4-8 and 11: Hunyadi Murph teaches a deposition system (Abst.), comprising: a first capillary having a first end and a second end and an inner diameter of 1500 µm or less (¶¶ 0036-0040; Fig. 1); a second capillary (¶¶ 0036-0040; Fig. 1); a first mixing region (¶¶ 0036-0040; Fig. 1); a first pump configured to pump fluid through the first capillary (¶¶ 0036-0040, 0050; Fig. 1); a second pump configured to pump fluid through the second capillary (¶¶ 0036-0040, 0050; Fig. 1); ad a print head comprising a suitable needle to deposit nano-scale material on a substrate (¶¶ 0070-0071, 0079). While Hunyadi Murph teaches that any suitable needle or other similar structure can be attached to the print head to deposit the nano-scale material (¶ 0079), Hunyadi Murph does not expressly teach an atomic force microscope. O’Connell teaches that atomic force microscopes are suitable needle structures for printing fluids with sub-50 nm resolutions (Abst.; p. 2712). O’Connell explains that such an atomic force microscope utilizes a cantilever and an outlet with an opening diameter of less than 100 nm (p. 2713, Col. 1). The simple substitution of one known element for another to obtain predictable results is prima facie obvious. MPEP § 2143. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the time of filing to have utilized an atomic force microscope as the needle in communication with the mixing region in Hunyadi Murph with the predictable expectation of success. Claims 2 and 3: O’Connell teaches that the AFM tip is made of silicon nitride (§ 2.4). Claims 9 and 10: Hunyadi Murph further teaches that the print head and a print bed are moved relative to one another and that the system is controlled by a controller (¶¶ 0070-0073). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Robert A Vetere whose telephone number is (571)270-1864. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-4:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Cleveland can be reached at (571) 270-1034. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT A VETERE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1712
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2024
Application Filed
May 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680182
FILM OF GRAPHITIC CARBON NITRIDE FOR PHOTOANODE AND A METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674225
GRAPHENE MATERIAL-METAL NANOCOMPOSITES AND PROCESSES OF MAKING AND USING SAME
5y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662580
Method of Functionalising an Elastomeric Material and the Use Thereof in Rubber Formulations
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12660573
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING A FLUID HEIGHT AND/OR A FLUID VELOCITY ON A SPINNING SUBSTRATE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12643833
CERAMIC INFILTRATION OF AIRCRAFT BRAKES VIA INJECTION FOR WEAR IMPROVEMENT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+12.8%)
3y 7m (~1y 11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 886 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month