Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/947,456

HANGER ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 14, 2024
Priority
Nov 16, 2023 — IN 202321077966
Examiner
MCNICHOLS, ERET C
Art Unit
3632
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
VERTIV CORPORATION
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
59%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
618 granted / 827 resolved
+22.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -16% lift
Without
With
+-16.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
851
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
67.0%
+27.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 827 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, 13-15 and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Patent No. 3,462,805 to Quisling (Quisling). PNG media_image1.png 458 750 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 1: Quisling discloses an apparatus comprising: a hanger assembly that includes: a first panel having (See Annotated Fig. A): a proximate edge (See Annotated Fig. A) having at least one cut-out (18) and at least one lance (16); and a distal edge (See Annotated Fig. A) having at least one cut-out (18) and at least one lance (16); and a second panel (See Annotated Fig. A) having: a proximate edge (See Annotated Fig. A) having at least one cut-out (18) and at least one lance (16); and a distal edge (See Annotated Fig. A) having at least one cut-out (18) and at least one lance (16), wherein: the hanger assembly is deformable such that the second panel (See Annotated Fig. A) abuts the first panel (See Annotated Fig. A); the at least one cut-out (18) of the proximate edge (See Annotated Fig. A) of the first panel (See Annotated Fig. A) receives the at least one lance (16) of the proximate edge of the second panel (See Annotated Fig. A); the at least one cut-out (18) of the distal edge of the first panel (See Annotated Fig. A) receives the at least one lance (16) of the distal edge of the second panel (See Annotated Fig. A); the at least one cut-out (18) of the proximate edge (See Annotated Fig. A) of the second panel (See Annotated Fig. A) receives the at least one lance (18) of the proximate edge of the first panel (See Annotated Fig. A); and the at least one cut-out (18) of the distal edge of the second panel (See Annotated Fig. A) receives the at least one lance (16) of the distal edge of the first panel (See Annotated Fig. A). Regarding Claim 2: Quisling discloses an apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first panel (See Annotated Fig. A) is defined by a flat sheet (See generally Annotated Fig. A). Regarding Claim 3: Quisling discloses an apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one lance (16) of the proximate edge of the first panel (See Annotated Fig. A) is bent and raised relative to a surface of the first panel (See Annotated Fig. A). Regarding Claim 4: Quisling discloses an apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one lance (16) of the distal edge of the first panel (See Annotated Fig. A) is bent and raised relative to a surface of the first panel (See Annotated Fig. A). Regarding Claim 5: Quisling discloses an apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one lance (16) of the proximate edge of the second panel (See Annotated Fig. A) is bent and raised relative to a surface of the second panel (See Annotated Fig. A). Regarding Claim 6: Quisling discloses an apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one lance (16) of the distal edge of the second panel (See Annotated Fig. A) is bent and raised relative to a surface of the second panel (See Annotated Fig. A). Regarding Claim 13: Quisling discloses an apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one lance (16) of the proximate edge of the first panel (See Annotated Fig. A) may be aligned in an opposite direction (See Annotated Fig. A) as the at least one lance (16) of the proximate edge of the second panel (See Annotated Fig. A). Regarding Claim 14: Quisling discloses an apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one lance (16) of the distal edge of the first panel (See Annotated Fig. A) may be aligned in an opposite direction (See Annotated Fig. A) as the at least one lance (16) of the distal edge of the second panel (See Annotated Fig. A). Regarding Claim 15: Quisling discloses an apparatus of claim 1, wherein a first surface of the first panel (See Annotated Fig. A) is affixed to a rigid surface (See Annotated Fig. A). Regarding Claim 17: Quisling discloses an apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first panel comprises at least one of a metal material (See Col. 3, line 3). Regarding Claim 18: Quisling discloses an apparatus of claim 1, wherein the second panel (See Annotated Fig. A) comprises at least one of a metal material (See Col. 3, line 3). Regarding Claim 19: Quisling discloses an apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one lance (16) of the proximate edge of the first panel (See Annotated Fig. A) is formed by a partial cut-out (18) of the first panel (See Annotated Fig. A), and wherein the at least one lance (16) of the distal edge of the first panel (See Annotated Fig. A) is formed by a partial cut-out (18) of the first panel (See Annotated Fig. A). Regarding Claim 20: Quisling discloses an apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one lance (16) of the proximate edge of the second panel (See Annotated Fig. A) is formed by a partial cut-out (18) of the second panel (See Annotated Fig. A), and wherein the at least one lance (16) of the distal edge of the second panel (See Annotated Fig. A) is formed by a partial cut-out (18) of the second panel (See Annotated Fig. A). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-12 and 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Reasons for Allowable Subject Matter None of the cited prior art, considered alone or in combination, discloses or teaches: the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the second panel comprises a U-shaped portion; the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the second panel is configured to slidably interlock with a portion of the first panel to form an enclosure; the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one lance of the proximate edge of the first panel may be aligned in a same direction as the at least one lance of the proximate edge of the second panel; or the apparatus of claim 15, wherein the rigid surface corresponds to a cabinet. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. In addition to the references used in this rejection and those cited in the PTO-892, the following references are very relevant to the claimed invention: US 5050824. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERET C MCNICHOLS whose telephone number is (571)270-7363. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 9:00 - 5:00 (Eastern). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Terrell McKinnon can be reached at 571-272-4797. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ERET C. MCNICHOLS Primary Examiner Art Unit 3632 /ERET C MCNICHOLS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3632
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637007
REARVIEW DEVICE WITH MOVEABLE HEAD ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLING SAME
1y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631286
TOOL-FREE ADJUSTABLE-TORQUE STAND SYSTEM
1y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624708
Jet Pump Clamps and Methods for use in a Nuclear Reactor Jet Pump
2y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12612817
Door Stop Repair Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12607290
MONITOR STAND WITH FOLDING MOUNTING BRACKETS
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
59%
With Interview (-16.0%)
2y 1m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 827 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month