Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/947,743

MEASUREMENT DEVICE AND SCANNING IMAGE ACQUISITION METHOD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 14, 2024
Priority
Feb 07, 2024 — JP 2024-016930
Examiner
IPPOLITO, NICOLE MARIE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hitachi High- Tech Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1511 granted / 1743 resolved
+26.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1767
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
33.8%
-6.2% vs TC avg
§102
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
§112
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1743 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The issue herein lies with independent claims 1, 6 and 12, and in particular the limitation “the controller performs time adjustment[s] such that an irradiation amount of light from the laser light source when the shutter is opened to start the irradiation with the light from the laser light source to when the imaging unit starts imaging of the scanning image is equal at the plurality of measurement points [emphasis added]”. The imaging unit is a charged particle beam, and in addition this laser light source is controlled by a shutter. However, with the claims as written the examiner cannot ascertain what is equal at the plurality of measurement points. The examiner sees several possibilities: that the laser light exposure and only the laser light exposure is equal at each measurement point, or that the exposure from the charged particle beam and the laser light exposure are controlled to be equal to one another at each of the measurement points, or, that the exposure from the charged particle beam and the exposure from the laser are controlled to be equal to each other at each of the measurement points and that both exposure devices are equal both to themselves and each other at each of the measurement points. The first hypothetical would be the broadest reasonable interpretation, however, the examiner cannot determine if that is the intent of the independent claims in their language. The examiner further suspects this might be an issue in the translation from Japanese to English. As none of the remaining claims rectify this issue, the examiner must likewise reject these claims under 35 USC 112 second paragraph. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Patent Application Publication Numbers 20240395499 and 20190237296. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICOLE M IPPOLITO whose telephone number is (571)270-7449. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 6:00am-4:00pm Mountain Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert H Kim can be reached at 571-272-2293. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NICOLE M IPPOLITO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2881
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12766206
AUTOMATED ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT HAND STERILIZATION STATION
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12770848
MASS SPECTROMETER AND METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763285
NANOSCALE FAILURE ANALYSIS METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12761185
DIFFERENTIAL TRAPPED ION MOBILITY SEPARATOR
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12755929
ASSESSMENT SYSTEM, METHOD OF ASSESSING
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+9.5%)
2y 0m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1743 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month